生物制剂治疗嗜酸性粒细胞性中耳炎的疗效。

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY Acta Oto-Laryngologica Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-03 DOI:10.1080/00016489.2024.2398657
Sang-Yoon Han, Sang-Yeon Lee, Myung-Whan Suh, Jun Ho Lee, Moo Kyun Park
{"title":"生物制剂治疗嗜酸性粒细胞性中耳炎的疗效。","authors":"Sang-Yoon Han, Sang-Yeon Lee, Myung-Whan Suh, Jun Ho Lee, Moo Kyun Park","doi":"10.1080/00016489.2024.2398657","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Eosinophilic otitis media (EOM) is an intractable condition primarily treated with steroids. Recently, biologics targeting IgE or IL-5 have been introduced.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of biologics for EOM.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We retrospectively collected data on EOM patients treated from January 2008 to December 2020 from electronic medical records. Patients were classified into the steroid group, treated with systemic or local steroids, and the biologics group, treated with biologics with or without steroids.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The otorrhea remission rate was 63.33% in the steroid group, comparable to 58.82% in the biologics group (<i>p</i> = 0.760). Before treatment, the steroid group showed better bone-conduction (BC) thresholds at 0.5 kHz and 1 kHz than the biologics group. Post-treatment, the steroid group improved in air-conduction (AC) threshold and air-bone gap (ABG) at 1 kHz and 2 kHz. The biologics group exhibited stable audiological results. No significant differences were observed post-treatment between the groups, except for the BC threshold at 0.5 kHz, which remained as pre-treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and significance: </strong>Biologics demonstrated similar efficacy in otorrhea remission as steroids and might help maintain hearing levels. Biologics can be considered for controlling EOM with active otorrhea and reducing systemic steroid use.</p>","PeriodicalId":6880,"journal":{"name":"Acta Oto-Laryngologica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of biologics for eosinophilic otitis media.\",\"authors\":\"Sang-Yoon Han, Sang-Yeon Lee, Myung-Whan Suh, Jun Ho Lee, Moo Kyun Park\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00016489.2024.2398657\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Eosinophilic otitis media (EOM) is an intractable condition primarily treated with steroids. Recently, biologics targeting IgE or IL-5 have been introduced.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of biologics for EOM.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We retrospectively collected data on EOM patients treated from January 2008 to December 2020 from electronic medical records. Patients were classified into the steroid group, treated with systemic or local steroids, and the biologics group, treated with biologics with or without steroids.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The otorrhea remission rate was 63.33% in the steroid group, comparable to 58.82% in the biologics group (<i>p</i> = 0.760). Before treatment, the steroid group showed better bone-conduction (BC) thresholds at 0.5 kHz and 1 kHz than the biologics group. Post-treatment, the steroid group improved in air-conduction (AC) threshold and air-bone gap (ABG) at 1 kHz and 2 kHz. The biologics group exhibited stable audiological results. No significant differences were observed post-treatment between the groups, except for the BC threshold at 0.5 kHz, which remained as pre-treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and significance: </strong>Biologics demonstrated similar efficacy in otorrhea remission as steroids and might help maintain hearing levels. Biologics can be considered for controlling EOM with active otorrhea and reducing systemic steroid use.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":6880,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Oto-Laryngologica\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Oto-Laryngologica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00016489.2024.2398657\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/3 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Oto-Laryngologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00016489.2024.2398657","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:嗜酸性粒细胞性中耳炎(EOM)是一种难治性疾病,主要采用类固醇治疗。最近,针对IgE或IL-5的生物制剂问世:本研究旨在评估生物制剂对 EOM 的疗效:我们从电子病历中回顾性地收集了2008年1月至2020年12月期间接受治疗的EOM患者的数据。患者被分为类固醇组(使用全身或局部类固醇治疗)和生物制剂组(使用生物制剂联合或不联合类固醇治疗):结果:类固醇组的耳痛缓解率为63.33%,生物制剂组为58.82%(P = 0.760)。治疗前,类固醇组在 0.5 kHz 和 1 kHz 时的骨传导(BC)阈值高于生物制剂组。治疗后,类固醇组在 1 千赫和 2 千赫的气导阈值和气骨间隙(ABG)方面有所改善。生物制剂组的听力结果稳定。除0.5 kHz的BC阈值与治疗前相同外,治疗后各组之间未发现明显差异:结论和意义:生物制剂在缓解耳痛方面的疗效与类固醇相似,可帮助维持听力水平。生物制剂可用于控制活动性耳痛的EOM,并减少全身类固醇的使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Efficacy of biologics for eosinophilic otitis media.

Background: Eosinophilic otitis media (EOM) is an intractable condition primarily treated with steroids. Recently, biologics targeting IgE or IL-5 have been introduced.

Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of biologics for EOM.

Materials and methods: We retrospectively collected data on EOM patients treated from January 2008 to December 2020 from electronic medical records. Patients were classified into the steroid group, treated with systemic or local steroids, and the biologics group, treated with biologics with or without steroids.

Results: The otorrhea remission rate was 63.33% in the steroid group, comparable to 58.82% in the biologics group (p = 0.760). Before treatment, the steroid group showed better bone-conduction (BC) thresholds at 0.5 kHz and 1 kHz than the biologics group. Post-treatment, the steroid group improved in air-conduction (AC) threshold and air-bone gap (ABG) at 1 kHz and 2 kHz. The biologics group exhibited stable audiological results. No significant differences were observed post-treatment between the groups, except for the BC threshold at 0.5 kHz, which remained as pre-treatment.

Conclusions and significance: Biologics demonstrated similar efficacy in otorrhea remission as steroids and might help maintain hearing levels. Biologics can be considered for controlling EOM with active otorrhea and reducing systemic steroid use.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Oto-Laryngologica
Acta Oto-Laryngologica 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
99
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Oto-Laryngologica is a truly international journal for translational otolaryngology and head- and neck surgery. The journal presents cutting-edge papers on clinical practice, clinical research and basic sciences. Acta also bridges the gap between clinical and basic research.
期刊最新文献
Extent of abscess development in cervical abscesses and pathogenic bacteria related to swallowing function. Narrow band imaging in oral cancer did not improve visualisation of the tumour borders: a prospective cohort study. Improved intracochlear biopolymeric drug delivery system: an in vivo study. Case-control study of otoconia proteins otolin-1 and otoconin-90 in patients with Meniere's disease. Impact of fast-track on recurrence and malignant transformation of patients with inverted papilloma.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1