用免疫检查点抑制剂治疗晚期子宫内膜癌的潜在预后预测因素。

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Japanese journal of clinical oncology Pub Date : 2024-09-03 DOI:10.1093/jjco/hyae123
Shintaro Yanazume, Chikako Nagata, Yusuke Kobayashi, Mika Fukuda, Mika Mizuno, Shinichi Togami, Hiroaki Kobayashi
{"title":"用免疫检查点抑制剂治疗晚期子宫内膜癌的潜在预后预测因素。","authors":"Shintaro Yanazume, Chikako Nagata, Yusuke Kobayashi, Mika Fukuda, Mika Mizuno, Shinichi Togami, Hiroaki Kobayashi","doi":"10.1093/jjco/hyae123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Prognostic predictors of immunotherapy in patients with advanced endometrial cancer remain unclear. The potential role of inflammatory predictors, including pretreatment neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio and hemoglobin, albumin, lymphocyte and platelet scores, was investigated.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between August 2018 and December 2023, 35 patients were retrospectively analyzed. Prognostic predictors were compared, and optimal cut-off values that exhibited the greatest discrimination for overall response, disease control, progression-free survival and overall survival were determined. Multivariate analysis was used to assess the prognostic significance of the predictors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The greatest discrimination for overall response, progression-free survival and overall survival included platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and hemoglobin, albumin, lymphocyte and platelet; the areas under the curve were 0.638, 0.649 and 0.641, respectively. The precise cut-off values of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio for progression-free survival and overall survival were 4.92 and 5.40, respectively. The lower neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio group had a significantly longer progression-free survival (P = 0.001, median survival; 4.0 months vs. 19 months) and longer overall survival (P = 0.002, median survival; 5.0 months vs. 21 months). Of the risk factors assessed, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (hazard ratio = 4.409; 95% CI = 1.10-17.64; P = 0.036) and regimen (hazard ratio = 5.559; 95% CI = 1.26-24.49; P = 0.023) were independently correlated with overall survival.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In patients with advanced endometrial cancer, pretreatment neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio may be a prognostic predictor of those who would benefit from immunotherapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":14656,"journal":{"name":"Japanese journal of clinical oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Potential prognostic predictors of treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors for advanced endometrial cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Shintaro Yanazume, Chikako Nagata, Yusuke Kobayashi, Mika Fukuda, Mika Mizuno, Shinichi Togami, Hiroaki Kobayashi\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jjco/hyae123\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Prognostic predictors of immunotherapy in patients with advanced endometrial cancer remain unclear. The potential role of inflammatory predictors, including pretreatment neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio and hemoglobin, albumin, lymphocyte and platelet scores, was investigated.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between August 2018 and December 2023, 35 patients were retrospectively analyzed. Prognostic predictors were compared, and optimal cut-off values that exhibited the greatest discrimination for overall response, disease control, progression-free survival and overall survival were determined. Multivariate analysis was used to assess the prognostic significance of the predictors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The greatest discrimination for overall response, progression-free survival and overall survival included platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and hemoglobin, albumin, lymphocyte and platelet; the areas under the curve were 0.638, 0.649 and 0.641, respectively. The precise cut-off values of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio for progression-free survival and overall survival were 4.92 and 5.40, respectively. The lower neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio group had a significantly longer progression-free survival (P = 0.001, median survival; 4.0 months vs. 19 months) and longer overall survival (P = 0.002, median survival; 5.0 months vs. 21 months). Of the risk factors assessed, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (hazard ratio = 4.409; 95% CI = 1.10-17.64; P = 0.036) and regimen (hazard ratio = 5.559; 95% CI = 1.26-24.49; P = 0.023) were independently correlated with overall survival.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In patients with advanced endometrial cancer, pretreatment neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio may be a prognostic predictor of those who would benefit from immunotherapy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14656,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Japanese journal of clinical oncology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Japanese journal of clinical oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jjco/hyae123\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japanese journal of clinical oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jjco/hyae123","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:晚期子宫内膜癌患者接受免疫治疗的预后预测指标仍不明确。研究人员调查了炎症预测因子的潜在作用,包括治疗前中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比率、血小板与淋巴细胞比率以及血红蛋白、白蛋白、淋巴细胞和血小板评分:对2018年8月至2023年12月期间的35例患者进行回顾性分析。比较了预后预测因子,并确定了对总体反应、疾病控制、无进展生存期和总生存期具有最大区分度的最佳临界值。多变量分析用于评估预测指标的预后意义:血小板与淋巴细胞比值、中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值以及血红蛋白、白蛋白、淋巴细胞和血小板对总体反应、无进展生存期和总体生存期的区分度最大;曲线下面积分别为 0.638、0.649 和 0.641。无进展生存期和总生存期的中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值的精确临界值分别为 4.92 和 5.40。中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值较低组的无进展生存期(P = 0.001,中位生存期;4.0 个月对 19 个月)和总生存期(P = 0.002,中位生存期;5.0 个月对 21 个月)明显较长。在评估的风险因素中,中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比率(危险比=4.409;95% CI=1.10-17.64;P=0.036)和治疗方案(危险比=5.559;95% CI=1.26-24.49;P=0.023)与总生存期独立相关:结论:在晚期子宫内膜癌患者中,治疗前的中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比率可能是预测免疫疗法获益者的预后指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Potential prognostic predictors of treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors for advanced endometrial cancer.

Background: Prognostic predictors of immunotherapy in patients with advanced endometrial cancer remain unclear. The potential role of inflammatory predictors, including pretreatment neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio and hemoglobin, albumin, lymphocyte and platelet scores, was investigated.

Methods: Between August 2018 and December 2023, 35 patients were retrospectively analyzed. Prognostic predictors were compared, and optimal cut-off values that exhibited the greatest discrimination for overall response, disease control, progression-free survival and overall survival were determined. Multivariate analysis was used to assess the prognostic significance of the predictors.

Results: The greatest discrimination for overall response, progression-free survival and overall survival included platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and hemoglobin, albumin, lymphocyte and platelet; the areas under the curve were 0.638, 0.649 and 0.641, respectively. The precise cut-off values of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio for progression-free survival and overall survival were 4.92 and 5.40, respectively. The lower neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio group had a significantly longer progression-free survival (P = 0.001, median survival; 4.0 months vs. 19 months) and longer overall survival (P = 0.002, median survival; 5.0 months vs. 21 months). Of the risk factors assessed, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (hazard ratio = 4.409; 95% CI = 1.10-17.64; P = 0.036) and regimen (hazard ratio = 5.559; 95% CI = 1.26-24.49; P = 0.023) were independently correlated with overall survival.

Conclusion: In patients with advanced endometrial cancer, pretreatment neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio may be a prognostic predictor of those who would benefit from immunotherapy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
177
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology is a multidisciplinary journal for clinical oncologists which strives to publish high quality manuscripts addressing medical oncology, clinical trials, radiology, surgery, basic research, and palliative care. The journal aims to contribute to the world"s scientific community with special attention to the area of clinical oncology and the Asian region. JJCO publishes various articles types including: ・Original Articles ・Case Reports ・Clinical Trial Notes ・Cancer Genetics Reports ・Epidemiology Notes ・Technical Notes ・Short Communications ・Letters to the Editors ・Solicited Reviews
期刊最新文献
Protocol digest of a phase III randomized trial of gross total resection versus possible resection of fluid-attenuated inversion recovery-hyperintense lesion on MRI for newly diagnosed supratentorial glioblastoma: JCOG2209 (FLAMINGO). COVID-19 in patients receiving treatment at an outpatient chemotherapy unit. The effect of epidermal growth factor receptor mutation on adjuvant chemotherapy with tegafur/uracil for patients with completely resected, non-lymph node metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (> 2 cm): a multicenter, retrospective, observational study as exploratory analysis of the CSPOR-LC03 study. Preoperative prediction of early mortality after surgery for spinal metastases. Salvage radiotherapy for locoregional recurrence of esophageal cancer after surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1