经颅直流电刺激左侧背外侧前额叶皮层的电场幅度对内在功能连接性变化的影响:随机交叉研究》。

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES Journal of Neuroscience Research Pub Date : 2024-09-03 DOI:10.1002/jnr.25378
Eunkyung Kim, Seo Jung Yun, Byung-Mo Oh, Han Gil Seo
{"title":"经颅直流电刺激左侧背外侧前额叶皮层的电场幅度对内在功能连接性变化的影响:随机交叉研究》。","authors":"Eunkyung Kim,&nbsp;Seo Jung Yun,&nbsp;Byung-Mo Oh,&nbsp;Han Gil Seo","doi":"10.1002/jnr.25378","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study investigated whether the electric field magnitude (E-field) delivered to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (L-DLPFC) changes resting-state brain activity and the L-DLPFC resting-state functional connectivity (rsFC), given the variability in tDCS response and lack of understanding of how rsFC changes. Twenty-one healthy participants received either 2 mA anodal or sham tDCS targeting the L-DLPFC for 10 min. Brain imaging was conducted before and after stimulation. The fractional amplitude of low-frequency fluctuation (fALFF), reflecting resting brain activity, and the L-DLPFC rsFC were analyzed to investigate the main effect of tDCS, main effect of time, and interaction effects. The E-field was estimated by modeling tDCS-induced individual electric fields and correlated with fALFF and L-DLPFC rsFC. Anodal tDCS increased fALFF in the left rostral middle frontal area and decreased fALFF in the midline frontal area (FWE <i>p</i> &lt; 0.050), whereas sham induced no changes. Overall rsFC decreased after sham (positive and negative connectivity, <i>p</i> = 0.001 and 0.020, respectively), with modest and nonsignificant changes after anodal tDCS (<i>p</i> = 0.063 and 0.069, respectively). No significant differences in local rsFC were observed among the conditions. Correlations were observed between the E-field and rsFC changes in the L-DLPFC (<i>r</i> = 0.385, <i>p</i> = 0.115), left inferior parietal area (<i>r</i> = 0.495, <i>p</i> = 0.037), and right lateral visual area (<i>r</i> = 0.683, <i>p</i> = 0.002). Single-session tDCS induced resting brain activity changes and may help maintain overall rsFC. The E-field in the L-DLPFC is associated with rsFC changes in both proximal and distally connected brain regions to the L-DLPFC.</p>","PeriodicalId":16490,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neuroscience Research","volume":"102 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jnr.25378","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of Electric Field Magnitude in the Left Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex on Changes in Intrinsic Functional Connectivity Using Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation: A Randomized Crossover Study\",\"authors\":\"Eunkyung Kim,&nbsp;Seo Jung Yun,&nbsp;Byung-Mo Oh,&nbsp;Han Gil Seo\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jnr.25378\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This study investigated whether the electric field magnitude (E-field) delivered to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (L-DLPFC) changes resting-state brain activity and the L-DLPFC resting-state functional connectivity (rsFC), given the variability in tDCS response and lack of understanding of how rsFC changes. Twenty-one healthy participants received either 2 mA anodal or sham tDCS targeting the L-DLPFC for 10 min. Brain imaging was conducted before and after stimulation. The fractional amplitude of low-frequency fluctuation (fALFF), reflecting resting brain activity, and the L-DLPFC rsFC were analyzed to investigate the main effect of tDCS, main effect of time, and interaction effects. The E-field was estimated by modeling tDCS-induced individual electric fields and correlated with fALFF and L-DLPFC rsFC. Anodal tDCS increased fALFF in the left rostral middle frontal area and decreased fALFF in the midline frontal area (FWE <i>p</i> &lt; 0.050), whereas sham induced no changes. Overall rsFC decreased after sham (positive and negative connectivity, <i>p</i> = 0.001 and 0.020, respectively), with modest and nonsignificant changes after anodal tDCS (<i>p</i> = 0.063 and 0.069, respectively). No significant differences in local rsFC were observed among the conditions. Correlations were observed between the E-field and rsFC changes in the L-DLPFC (<i>r</i> = 0.385, <i>p</i> = 0.115), left inferior parietal area (<i>r</i> = 0.495, <i>p</i> = 0.037), and right lateral visual area (<i>r</i> = 0.683, <i>p</i> = 0.002). Single-session tDCS induced resting brain activity changes and may help maintain overall rsFC. The E-field in the L-DLPFC is associated with rsFC changes in both proximal and distally connected brain regions to the L-DLPFC.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16490,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Neuroscience Research\",\"volume\":\"102 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jnr.25378\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Neuroscience Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jnr.25378\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neuroscience Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jnr.25378","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

鉴于 tDCS 反应的可变性和对 rsFC 如何变化缺乏了解,本研究调查了向左侧背外侧前额叶皮层(L-DLPFC)输送的电场幅度(E-field)是否会改变静息态大脑活动和 L-DLPFC 静息态功能连接(rsFC)。21 名健康参与者接受了针对 L-DLPFC 的 2 mA 阳极或假 tDCS,持续 10 分钟。刺激前后均进行了脑成像。分析了反映静息大脑活动的低频波动分数振幅(fALFF)和 L-DLPFC rsFC,以研究 tDCS 的主效应、时间的主效应和交互效应。电场是通过对 tDCS 诱导的单个电场进行建模估算得出的,并与 fALFF 和 L-DLPFC rsFC 相关。阳极 tDCS 增加了左侧喙中额叶区的 fALFF,降低了中线额叶区的 fALFF(FWE p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Impact of Electric Field Magnitude in the Left Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex on Changes in Intrinsic Functional Connectivity Using Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation: A Randomized Crossover Study

This study investigated whether the electric field magnitude (E-field) delivered to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (L-DLPFC) changes resting-state brain activity and the L-DLPFC resting-state functional connectivity (rsFC), given the variability in tDCS response and lack of understanding of how rsFC changes. Twenty-one healthy participants received either 2 mA anodal or sham tDCS targeting the L-DLPFC for 10 min. Brain imaging was conducted before and after stimulation. The fractional amplitude of low-frequency fluctuation (fALFF), reflecting resting brain activity, and the L-DLPFC rsFC were analyzed to investigate the main effect of tDCS, main effect of time, and interaction effects. The E-field was estimated by modeling tDCS-induced individual electric fields and correlated with fALFF and L-DLPFC rsFC. Anodal tDCS increased fALFF in the left rostral middle frontal area and decreased fALFF in the midline frontal area (FWE p < 0.050), whereas sham induced no changes. Overall rsFC decreased after sham (positive and negative connectivity, p = 0.001 and 0.020, respectively), with modest and nonsignificant changes after anodal tDCS (p = 0.063 and 0.069, respectively). No significant differences in local rsFC were observed among the conditions. Correlations were observed between the E-field and rsFC changes in the L-DLPFC (r = 0.385, p = 0.115), left inferior parietal area (r = 0.495, p = 0.037), and right lateral visual area (r = 0.683, p = 0.002). Single-session tDCS induced resting brain activity changes and may help maintain overall rsFC. The E-field in the L-DLPFC is associated with rsFC changes in both proximal and distally connected brain regions to the L-DLPFC.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Neuroscience Research
Journal of Neuroscience Research 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
2.40%
发文量
145
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neuroscience Research (JNR) publishes novel research results that will advance our understanding of the development, function and pathophysiology of the nervous system, using molecular, cellular, systems, and translational approaches. JNR covers both basic research and clinical aspects of neurology, neuropathology, psychiatry or psychology. The journal focuses on uncovering the intricacies of brain structure and function. Research published in JNR covers all species from invertebrates to humans, and the reports inform the readers about the function and organization of the nervous system, with emphasis on how disease modifies the function and organization.
期刊最新文献
Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Anatomical Correlation of Human Temporal Lobe Landmarks in 3D Euclidean Space: A Study of Control and Epilepsy Disease Subjects Transcorneal Electrical Stimulation Modulates Visual Pathway Function in Mice Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells: Directed Differentiation Methods and Applications in Brain Diseases EXPRESSION OF CONCERN: Role of the Nrf2-ARE Pathway in Early Brain Injury After Experimental Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Klf10 Regulates the Emergence of Glial Phenotypes During Hypothalamic Development
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1