Divya Ayyala-Somayajula, Thomas Bottyan, Suhail Shaikh, Brian P Lee, Stephanie H Cho, Jennifer L Dodge, Norah A Terrault, Hyosun Han
{"title":"肝移植后阿坎酸治疗酒精使用障碍的安全性:随机对照试验。","authors":"Divya Ayyala-Somayajula, Thomas Bottyan, Suhail Shaikh, Brian P Lee, Stephanie H Cho, Jennifer L Dodge, Norah A Terrault, Hyosun Han","doi":"10.1097/LVT.0000000000000475","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Acamprosate is a therapy for alcohol use disorder, but data on feasibility and safety in recipients of liver transplants are lacking. This was a single-center unblinded prospective pilot randomized controlled trial of adults (≥18 y) with liver transplant for alcohol-associated liver disease enrolled between 2021 and 2023, who were randomized 2:1 to the intervention of acamprosate (666 mg dose 3 times daily) or standard of care (SOC) over 14 weeks. Outcomes included safety (prevalence of adverse events [AEs]), feasibility (weekly survey response rate >60%), adherence (self-reported acamprosate use >60%), and efficacy (reduction in Penn Alcohol Craving Scale), and relapse-blood phosphatidylethanol (≥20 ng/mL/reported alcohol use) evaluated by standardized weekly surveys. The efficacy analysis was done in both the intention-to-treat (excluding withdrawals before medication administration) and per-protocol population (excluding withdrawals/<4 weeks participation). Of 78 participants who were approached, 30 enrolled (19 acamprosate and 11 SOC) with similar baseline characteristics. Eight participants withdrew (6 acamprosate before medication administration and 2 SOC). AEs were similar between acamprosate and SOC groups (92.3% vs. 90.0%, p > 0.99), including grade 3 AEs (53.9% vs. 60.0%, p > 0.99) with no reported grade 4/5 AEs. Survey response rates were similar in acamprosate versus SOC groups (61.0% vs. 76.0%, p = 0.19), and 69.0% were acamprosate adherents. Baseline Penn Alcohol Craving Scale values were low with no difference by the group in median absolute change in Penn Alcohol Craving Scale for intention-to-treat (0, IQR: -4 to 0 vs. 0, IQR: 0-0, p = 0.32), and per-protocol analyses (-1, IQR: -6 to 0 vs. 0, IQR: -0 to 0, p = 0.36). There was no reported or biochemical evidence of alcohol relapse. In this pilot study, preliminary data suggest that acamprosate may be safe and feasible. These data can inform larger studies and clinician efforts to address alcohol use disorder in post-liver transplant care (ClinicalTrials.gov, Number: NCT06471686).</p>","PeriodicalId":18072,"journal":{"name":"Liver Transplantation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Safety of acamprosate for alcohol use disorder after liver transplant: A pilot randomized controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Divya Ayyala-Somayajula, Thomas Bottyan, Suhail Shaikh, Brian P Lee, Stephanie H Cho, Jennifer L Dodge, Norah A Terrault, Hyosun Han\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/LVT.0000000000000475\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Acamprosate is a therapy for alcohol use disorder, but data on feasibility and safety in recipients of liver transplants are lacking. This was a single-center unblinded prospective pilot randomized controlled trial of adults (≥18 y) with liver transplant for alcohol-associated liver disease enrolled between 2021 and 2023, who were randomized 2:1 to the intervention of acamprosate (666 mg dose 3 times daily) or standard of care (SOC) over 14 weeks. Outcomes included safety (prevalence of adverse events [AEs]), feasibility (weekly survey response rate >60%), adherence (self-reported acamprosate use >60%), and efficacy (reduction in Penn Alcohol Craving Scale), and relapse-blood phosphatidylethanol (≥20 ng/mL/reported alcohol use) evaluated by standardized weekly surveys. The efficacy analysis was done in both the intention-to-treat (excluding withdrawals before medication administration) and per-protocol population (excluding withdrawals/<4 weeks participation). Of 78 participants who were approached, 30 enrolled (19 acamprosate and 11 SOC) with similar baseline characteristics. Eight participants withdrew (6 acamprosate before medication administration and 2 SOC). AEs were similar between acamprosate and SOC groups (92.3% vs. 90.0%, p > 0.99), including grade 3 AEs (53.9% vs. 60.0%, p > 0.99) with no reported grade 4/5 AEs. Survey response rates were similar in acamprosate versus SOC groups (61.0% vs. 76.0%, p = 0.19), and 69.0% were acamprosate adherents. Baseline Penn Alcohol Craving Scale values were low with no difference by the group in median absolute change in Penn Alcohol Craving Scale for intention-to-treat (0, IQR: -4 to 0 vs. 0, IQR: 0-0, p = 0.32), and per-protocol analyses (-1, IQR: -6 to 0 vs. 0, IQR: -0 to 0, p = 0.36). There was no reported or biochemical evidence of alcohol relapse. In this pilot study, preliminary data suggest that acamprosate may be safe and feasible. These data can inform larger studies and clinician efforts to address alcohol use disorder in post-liver transplant care (ClinicalTrials.gov, Number: NCT06471686).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18072,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Liver Transplantation\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Liver Transplantation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/LVT.0000000000000475\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Liver Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/LVT.0000000000000475","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
简介:阿坎酸是一种治疗酒精使用障碍的药物,但缺乏有关肝移植受者服用阿坎酸可行性和安全性的数据:阿坎酸是一种治疗酒精使用障碍的药物,但在肝移植(LT)受者中的可行性和安全性数据尚缺:这是一项单中心非盲法前瞻性随机对照试验,研究对象为2021-2023年间入组的成人(≥18岁)肝移植ALD患者,他们以2:1的比例随机接受阿坎酸(666毫克剂量,每日三次)或标准护理(SOC)干预,为期14周。结果包括安全性[不良事件(AE)发生率]、可行性(每周调查回复率>60%)、依从性(自我报告的阿坎酸使用率>60%)和疗效(宾州酒精渴求量表[PACS]的降低),以及通过标准化每周调查评估的复发-血液磷脂酰乙醇≥20ng/mL/报告的酒精使用量。疗效分析在意向治疗人群(ITT)(不包括用药前戒酒者)和按方案人群(PP)(不包括戒酒者/结果:在 78 名受试者中,有 30 人参加了治疗(19 人服用阿坎酸,11 人服用 SOC),他们的基线特征相似。8 名参与者退出(6 名在用药前服用阿坎酸,2 名服用 SOC)。阿坎酸组和 SOC 组的 AEs 相似(92.3% vs. 90.0%,p>0.99),包括 3 级 AEs(53.9% vs. 60.0%,p>0.99),无 4/5 级 AEs 报告。阿坎酸组与SOC组的调查回复率相似(61.0% vs. 76.0%,p=0.19),69.0%的患者坚持服用阿坎酸。基线 PACS 值较低,在 ITT(0,IQR:-4-0 vs. 0,IQR:0-0,p=0.32)和 PP 分析(-1,IQR:-6-0 vs. 0,IQR:0-0,p=0.36)中,各组 PACS 绝对值变化中位数无差异。没有关于酒精复发的报告或生化证据:在这项试点研究中,初步数据表明阿坎酸可能是安全可行的。这些数据可为更大规模的研究和临床医生在 LT 后护理中解决酒精使用障碍问题提供参考。(ClinicalTrials.gov,编号:NCT06471686)。
Safety of acamprosate for alcohol use disorder after liver transplant: A pilot randomized controlled trial.
Acamprosate is a therapy for alcohol use disorder, but data on feasibility and safety in recipients of liver transplants are lacking. This was a single-center unblinded prospective pilot randomized controlled trial of adults (≥18 y) with liver transplant for alcohol-associated liver disease enrolled between 2021 and 2023, who were randomized 2:1 to the intervention of acamprosate (666 mg dose 3 times daily) or standard of care (SOC) over 14 weeks. Outcomes included safety (prevalence of adverse events [AEs]), feasibility (weekly survey response rate >60%), adherence (self-reported acamprosate use >60%), and efficacy (reduction in Penn Alcohol Craving Scale), and relapse-blood phosphatidylethanol (≥20 ng/mL/reported alcohol use) evaluated by standardized weekly surveys. The efficacy analysis was done in both the intention-to-treat (excluding withdrawals before medication administration) and per-protocol population (excluding withdrawals/<4 weeks participation). Of 78 participants who were approached, 30 enrolled (19 acamprosate and 11 SOC) with similar baseline characteristics. Eight participants withdrew (6 acamprosate before medication administration and 2 SOC). AEs were similar between acamprosate and SOC groups (92.3% vs. 90.0%, p > 0.99), including grade 3 AEs (53.9% vs. 60.0%, p > 0.99) with no reported grade 4/5 AEs. Survey response rates were similar in acamprosate versus SOC groups (61.0% vs. 76.0%, p = 0.19), and 69.0% were acamprosate adherents. Baseline Penn Alcohol Craving Scale values were low with no difference by the group in median absolute change in Penn Alcohol Craving Scale for intention-to-treat (0, IQR: -4 to 0 vs. 0, IQR: 0-0, p = 0.32), and per-protocol analyses (-1, IQR: -6 to 0 vs. 0, IQR: -0 to 0, p = 0.36). There was no reported or biochemical evidence of alcohol relapse. In this pilot study, preliminary data suggest that acamprosate may be safe and feasible. These data can inform larger studies and clinician efforts to address alcohol use disorder in post-liver transplant care (ClinicalTrials.gov, Number: NCT06471686).
期刊介绍:
Since the first application of liver transplantation in a clinical situation was reported more than twenty years ago, there has been a great deal of growth in this field and more is anticipated. As an official publication of the AASLD, Liver Transplantation delivers current, peer-reviewed articles on liver transplantation, liver surgery, and chronic liver disease — the information necessary to keep abreast of this evolving specialty.