由祖父母或多代同堂家庭抚养的儿童的语言和沟通发展以及入学准备情况。

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology Pub Date : 2024-09-03 DOI:10.1111/ppe.13118
Sarah A Keim, Rachel E Mason, Samrawit F Yisahak
{"title":"由祖父母或多代同堂家庭抚养的儿童的语言和沟通发展以及入学准备情况。","authors":"Sarah A Keim, Rachel E Mason, Samrawit F Yisahak","doi":"10.1111/ppe.13118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>One in ten U.S. children lives with a grandparent, and more foster children are being placed in kinship care.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Our objective was to compare early language and communication development and school readiness among children raised by grandparents (alone or in multigenerational households) to children raised by parents.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included in this cross-sectional study children ages 1-5 years from the 2016-2020 National Survey of Children's Health to examine healthy and ready to learn school readiness outcomes and binary language and communication development (2018-2020 data only) by caregiver type (parent, multigenerational, and grandparent-only) with survey-weighted log-binomial regression adjusted for confounders. We stratified by survey years pre-COVID-19 pandemic versus during.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 33,342 children, 86.0% (SE = 0.51) of children were 'On-Track' for language and communication development; only 37.2% (SE = 0.68) were 'On-Track' overall for school readiness. Children raised by grandparents or in multigenerational households were more often 'On-Track' for school readiness than children raised by parents, but only upon adjustment for covariates (adjusted prevalence ratio (aPR) for grandparent-only 1.13, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.11, 1.15; aPR for multigenerational 1.13, CI 1.12, 1.15). Smaller and less consistent differences in prevalence were observed for the other outcomes (language and communication development, school readiness domains of early learning skills, social-emotional development, self-regulation development and physical well-being and motor development). A disparity in school readiness may have emerged during the COVID-19 pandemic; children in grandparent-only households had a lower prevalence of being 'On-Track' for school readiness (aPR 0.71, 95% CI 0.69, 0.73) compared to children in parent households, whereas children in multigenerational households continued to be more often school-ready than children in parent households.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Large proportions of children across caregiver types were not fully prepared for school. Consideration of key covariates is important because socio-economic disadvantage may mask other advantages grandparent-led and multigenerational households offer children's early development.</p>","PeriodicalId":19698,"journal":{"name":"Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Language and communication development and school readiness of children raised by grandparents or in multi-generational homes.\",\"authors\":\"Sarah A Keim, Rachel E Mason, Samrawit F Yisahak\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ppe.13118\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>One in ten U.S. children lives with a grandparent, and more foster children are being placed in kinship care.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Our objective was to compare early language and communication development and school readiness among children raised by grandparents (alone or in multigenerational households) to children raised by parents.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included in this cross-sectional study children ages 1-5 years from the 2016-2020 National Survey of Children's Health to examine healthy and ready to learn school readiness outcomes and binary language and communication development (2018-2020 data only) by caregiver type (parent, multigenerational, and grandparent-only) with survey-weighted log-binomial regression adjusted for confounders. We stratified by survey years pre-COVID-19 pandemic versus during.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 33,342 children, 86.0% (SE = 0.51) of children were 'On-Track' for language and communication development; only 37.2% (SE = 0.68) were 'On-Track' overall for school readiness. Children raised by grandparents or in multigenerational households were more often 'On-Track' for school readiness than children raised by parents, but only upon adjustment for covariates (adjusted prevalence ratio (aPR) for grandparent-only 1.13, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.11, 1.15; aPR for multigenerational 1.13, CI 1.12, 1.15). Smaller and less consistent differences in prevalence were observed for the other outcomes (language and communication development, school readiness domains of early learning skills, social-emotional development, self-regulation development and physical well-being and motor development). A disparity in school readiness may have emerged during the COVID-19 pandemic; children in grandparent-only households had a lower prevalence of being 'On-Track' for school readiness (aPR 0.71, 95% CI 0.69, 0.73) compared to children in parent households, whereas children in multigenerational households continued to be more often school-ready than children in parent households.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Large proportions of children across caregiver types were not fully prepared for school. Consideration of key covariates is important because socio-economic disadvantage may mask other advantages grandparent-led and multigenerational households offer children's early development.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19698,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/ppe.13118\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ppe.13118","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:每 10 个美国儿童中就有 1 个与祖父母生活在一起,越来越多的寄养儿童被安置在亲属照料机构:我们的目标是比较由祖父母(单独或多代同堂)抚养的儿童与由父母抚养的儿童的早期语言和沟通发展以及入学准备情况:在这项横断面研究中,我们纳入了 2016-2020 年全国儿童健康调查中 1-5 岁的儿童,通过调查加权对数二叉回归(经混杂因素调整),按照顾者类型(父母、多代家庭和仅祖父母)对健康和准备学习的入学准备结果以及二元语言和沟通发展(仅 2018-2020 年数据)进行了研究。我们按照COVID-19大流行前与大流行期间的调查年份进行了分层:在 33342 名儿童中,86.0%(SE = 0.51)的儿童在语言和沟通发展方面 "步入正轨";只有 37.2%(SE = 0.68)的儿童在入学准备方面总体 "步入正轨"。与父母抚养的儿童相比,由祖父母抚养或在多代同堂家庭中抚养的儿童在入学准备方面 "步入正轨 "的比例更高,但这只是在对共变量进行调整后的结果(仅祖父母抚养儿童的调整患病率比(aPR)为 1.13,95% 置信区间(CI)为 1.11,1.15;多代同堂儿童的调整患病率比(aPR)为 1.13,CI 为 1.12,1.15)。其他结果(语言和沟通发展、早期学习技能的入学准备领域、社会情感发展、自我调节发展以及身体健康和运动发展)的患病率差异较小且不太一致。在COVID-19大流行期间,入学准备方面可能出现了差异;与父母家庭中的儿童相比,祖父母家庭中的儿童入学准备 "步入正轨 "的比例较低(aPR为0.71,95% CI为0.69,0.73),而多代同堂家庭中的儿童则比父母家庭中的儿童更经常做好入学准备:结论:不同照料者类型的儿童中有很大一部分没有为入学做好充分准备。考虑关键共变量非常重要,因为社会经济劣势可能会掩盖祖父母主导型家庭和多代同堂家庭为儿童早期发展提供的其他优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Language and communication development and school readiness of children raised by grandparents or in multi-generational homes.

Background: One in ten U.S. children lives with a grandparent, and more foster children are being placed in kinship care.

Objectives: Our objective was to compare early language and communication development and school readiness among children raised by grandparents (alone or in multigenerational households) to children raised by parents.

Methods: We included in this cross-sectional study children ages 1-5 years from the 2016-2020 National Survey of Children's Health to examine healthy and ready to learn school readiness outcomes and binary language and communication development (2018-2020 data only) by caregiver type (parent, multigenerational, and grandparent-only) with survey-weighted log-binomial regression adjusted for confounders. We stratified by survey years pre-COVID-19 pandemic versus during.

Results: Among 33,342 children, 86.0% (SE = 0.51) of children were 'On-Track' for language and communication development; only 37.2% (SE = 0.68) were 'On-Track' overall for school readiness. Children raised by grandparents or in multigenerational households were more often 'On-Track' for school readiness than children raised by parents, but only upon adjustment for covariates (adjusted prevalence ratio (aPR) for grandparent-only 1.13, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.11, 1.15; aPR for multigenerational 1.13, CI 1.12, 1.15). Smaller and less consistent differences in prevalence were observed for the other outcomes (language and communication development, school readiness domains of early learning skills, social-emotional development, self-regulation development and physical well-being and motor development). A disparity in school readiness may have emerged during the COVID-19 pandemic; children in grandparent-only households had a lower prevalence of being 'On-Track' for school readiness (aPR 0.71, 95% CI 0.69, 0.73) compared to children in parent households, whereas children in multigenerational households continued to be more often school-ready than children in parent households.

Conclusion: Large proportions of children across caregiver types were not fully prepared for school. Consideration of key covariates is important because socio-economic disadvantage may mask other advantages grandparent-led and multigenerational households offer children's early development.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
84
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology crosses the boundaries between the epidemiologist and the paediatrician, obstetrician or specialist in child health, ensuring that important paediatric and perinatal studies reach those clinicians for whom the results are especially relevant. In addition to original research articles, the Journal also includes commentaries, book reviews and annotations.
期刊最新文献
Opioid analgesic and antidepressant use during pregnancy and the risk of spontaneous preterm birth: A nested case-control study. Post-term births as a risk factor for small for gestational age births and infant mortality in Brazil, Mexico, and Palestinian refugees: An analysis of electronic birth records. The not-so-simple question of when or if to induce a term pregnancy. Data have consequences-Centring equity in the maternal mortality surveillance debate. Making sense of US maternal mortality data.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1