共同制作家庭报告干预措施,以改善安全监控并减少差异。

IF 6.2 2区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS Pediatrics Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1542/peds.2023-065245
Alisa Khan, Jennifer Baird, Sangeeta Mauskar, Helen W Haskell, Alexandra N Habibi, Tiffany Ngo, Alexandra Aldarondo, Jay G Berry, Katherine L Copp, Jessica P Liu, Brynn Elder, Kathryn P Gray, Karen Hennessy, Kate E Humphrey, Donna Luff, Nandini Mallick, Susan Matherson, Amanda G McGeachey, Patrice Melvin, Amy L Pinkham, Bianca Quiñones-Pérez, Jayne Rogers, Sara J Singer, Patricia A Stoeck, Sara L Toomey, K Viswanath, Jayme L Wilder, Mark A Schuster, Christopher P Landrigan
{"title":"共同制作家庭报告干预措施,以改善安全监控并减少差异。","authors":"Alisa Khan, Jennifer Baird, Sangeeta Mauskar, Helen W Haskell, Alexandra N Habibi, Tiffany Ngo, Alexandra Aldarondo, Jay G Berry, Katherine L Copp, Jessica P Liu, Brynn Elder, Kathryn P Gray, Karen Hennessy, Kate E Humphrey, Donna Luff, Nandini Mallick, Susan Matherson, Amanda G McGeachey, Patrice Melvin, Amy L Pinkham, Bianca Quiñones-Pérez, Jayne Rogers, Sara J Singer, Patricia A Stoeck, Sara L Toomey, K Viswanath, Jayme L Wilder, Mark A Schuster, Christopher P Landrigan","doi":"10.1542/peds.2023-065245","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Examine family safety-reporting after implementing a parent-nurse-physician-leader coproduced, health literacy-informed, family safety-reporting intervention for hospitalized families of children with medical complexity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We implemented an English and Spanish mobile family-safety-reporting tool, staff and family education, and process for sharing comments with unit leaders on a dedicated inpatient complex care service at a pediatric hospital. Families shared safety concerns via predischarge surveys (baseline and intervention) and mobile tool (intervention). Three physicians with patient safety expertise classified events. We compared safety-reporting baseline (via survey) versus intervention (via survey and/or mobile tool) with generalized estimating equations and sub-analyzed data by COVID-19-era and educational attainment. We also compared mobile tool-detected event rates with hospital voluntary incident reporting.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>232 baseline and 208 intervention parents participated (78.2% consented); 29.5% of baseline families versus 38.2% of intervention families reported safety concerns (P = .09). Adjusted odds ratio (95% CI) of families reporting safety concerns intervention versus baseline was 1.6 (1.0-2.6) overall, 2.6 (1.3-5.4) for those with < college education, and 3.1 (1.3-7.3) in the COVID-19-era subgroup. Safety concerns reported via mobile tool (34.6% of enrolled parents) included 42 medical errors, 43 nonsafety-related quality issues, 11 hazards, and 4 other. 15% of mobile tool concerns were also detected with voluntary incident reporting.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Family safety-reporting was unchanged overall after implementing a mobile reporting tool, though reporting increased among families with lower educational attainment and during the COVID-19 pandemic. The tool identified many events not otherwise captured by staff-only voluntary incident reporting. Hospitals should proactively engage families in reporting to improve safety, quality, and equity.</p>","PeriodicalId":20028,"journal":{"name":"Pediatrics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Coproduced Family Reporting Intervention to Improve Safety Surveillance and Reduce Disparities.\",\"authors\":\"Alisa Khan, Jennifer Baird, Sangeeta Mauskar, Helen W Haskell, Alexandra N Habibi, Tiffany Ngo, Alexandra Aldarondo, Jay G Berry, Katherine L Copp, Jessica P Liu, Brynn Elder, Kathryn P Gray, Karen Hennessy, Kate E Humphrey, Donna Luff, Nandini Mallick, Susan Matherson, Amanda G McGeachey, Patrice Melvin, Amy L Pinkham, Bianca Quiñones-Pérez, Jayne Rogers, Sara J Singer, Patricia A Stoeck, Sara L Toomey, K Viswanath, Jayme L Wilder, Mark A Schuster, Christopher P Landrigan\",\"doi\":\"10.1542/peds.2023-065245\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Examine family safety-reporting after implementing a parent-nurse-physician-leader coproduced, health literacy-informed, family safety-reporting intervention for hospitalized families of children with medical complexity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We implemented an English and Spanish mobile family-safety-reporting tool, staff and family education, and process for sharing comments with unit leaders on a dedicated inpatient complex care service at a pediatric hospital. Families shared safety concerns via predischarge surveys (baseline and intervention) and mobile tool (intervention). Three physicians with patient safety expertise classified events. We compared safety-reporting baseline (via survey) versus intervention (via survey and/or mobile tool) with generalized estimating equations and sub-analyzed data by COVID-19-era and educational attainment. We also compared mobile tool-detected event rates with hospital voluntary incident reporting.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>232 baseline and 208 intervention parents participated (78.2% consented); 29.5% of baseline families versus 38.2% of intervention families reported safety concerns (P = .09). Adjusted odds ratio (95% CI) of families reporting safety concerns intervention versus baseline was 1.6 (1.0-2.6) overall, 2.6 (1.3-5.4) for those with < college education, and 3.1 (1.3-7.3) in the COVID-19-era subgroup. Safety concerns reported via mobile tool (34.6% of enrolled parents) included 42 medical errors, 43 nonsafety-related quality issues, 11 hazards, and 4 other. 15% of mobile tool concerns were also detected with voluntary incident reporting.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Family safety-reporting was unchanged overall after implementing a mobile reporting tool, though reporting increased among families with lower educational attainment and during the COVID-19 pandemic. The tool identified many events not otherwise captured by staff-only voluntary incident reporting. Hospitals should proactively engage families in reporting to improve safety, quality, and equity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20028,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pediatrics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pediatrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2023-065245\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2023-065245","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标:在对住院的复杂病症儿童家庭实施家长-护士-医生-领导共同制定的、以健康知识为基础的家庭安全报告干预措施后,研究家庭安全报告情况:研究针对住院复杂病症患儿家庭实施家长-护士-医生-领导共同制定的、以健康知识为基础的家庭安全报告干预措施后的家庭安全报告情况:方法:我们在一家儿科医院的复杂住院病人专科护理服务中使用了一种英语和西班牙语的移动式家庭安全报告工具、员工和家庭教育以及与科室领导分享意见的流程。家属通过出院前调查(基线和干预)和移动工具(干预)分享安全问题。三位具有患者安全专业知识的医生对事件进行分类。我们利用广义估计方程比较了安全报告基线(通过调查)和干预(通过调查和/或移动工具),并按照 COVID-19 年代和教育程度对数据进行了子分析。我们还比较了移动工具检测到的事件发生率和医院自愿报告的事件发生率。结果:232 个基线家长和 208 个干预家长参与(78.2% 同意);29.5% 的基线家庭和 38.2% 的干预家庭报告了安全问题(P = .09)。干预家庭与基线家庭报告安全问题的调整几率比(95% CI)总体为 1.6 (1.0-2.6),受教育程度低于大学的家庭为 2.6 (1.3-5.4),COVID-19 时代亚组为 3.1 (1.3-7.3)。通过移动工具报告的安全问题(占注册家长的 34.6%)包括 42 个医疗差错、43 个与安全无关的质量问题、11 个危险和 4 个其他问题。15%的移动工具问题也是通过自愿事件报告发现的:结论:采用移动报告工具后,家庭安全报告情况总体上没有变化,但教育程度较低的家庭和 COVID-19 大流行期间的报告情况有所增加。该工具发现了许多员工自愿事件报告中没有发现的事件。医院应主动让家属参与报告,以提高安全性、质量和公平性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Coproduced Family Reporting Intervention to Improve Safety Surveillance and Reduce Disparities.

Objectives: Examine family safety-reporting after implementing a parent-nurse-physician-leader coproduced, health literacy-informed, family safety-reporting intervention for hospitalized families of children with medical complexity.

Methods: We implemented an English and Spanish mobile family-safety-reporting tool, staff and family education, and process for sharing comments with unit leaders on a dedicated inpatient complex care service at a pediatric hospital. Families shared safety concerns via predischarge surveys (baseline and intervention) and mobile tool (intervention). Three physicians with patient safety expertise classified events. We compared safety-reporting baseline (via survey) versus intervention (via survey and/or mobile tool) with generalized estimating equations and sub-analyzed data by COVID-19-era and educational attainment. We also compared mobile tool-detected event rates with hospital voluntary incident reporting.

Results: 232 baseline and 208 intervention parents participated (78.2% consented); 29.5% of baseline families versus 38.2% of intervention families reported safety concerns (P = .09). Adjusted odds ratio (95% CI) of families reporting safety concerns intervention versus baseline was 1.6 (1.0-2.6) overall, 2.6 (1.3-5.4) for those with < college education, and 3.1 (1.3-7.3) in the COVID-19-era subgroup. Safety concerns reported via mobile tool (34.6% of enrolled parents) included 42 medical errors, 43 nonsafety-related quality issues, 11 hazards, and 4 other. 15% of mobile tool concerns were also detected with voluntary incident reporting.

Conclusions: Family safety-reporting was unchanged overall after implementing a mobile reporting tool, though reporting increased among families with lower educational attainment and during the COVID-19 pandemic. The tool identified many events not otherwise captured by staff-only voluntary incident reporting. Hospitals should proactively engage families in reporting to improve safety, quality, and equity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pediatrics
Pediatrics 医学-小儿科
CiteScore
12.80
自引率
5.00%
发文量
791
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: The Pediatrics® journal is the official flagship journal of the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP). It is widely cited in the field of pediatric medicine and is recognized as the leading journal in the field. The journal publishes original research and evidence-based articles, which provide authoritative information to help readers stay up-to-date with the latest developments in pediatric medicine. The content is peer-reviewed and undergoes rigorous evaluation to ensure its quality and reliability. Pediatrics also serves as a valuable resource for conducting new research studies and supporting education and training activities in the field of pediatrics. It aims to enhance the quality of pediatric outpatient and inpatient care by disseminating valuable knowledge and insights. As of 2023, Pediatrics has an impressive Journal Impact Factor (IF) Score of 8.0. The IF is a measure of a journal's influence and importance in the scientific community, with higher scores indicating a greater impact. This score reflects the significance and reach of the research published in Pediatrics, further establishing its prominence in the field of pediatric medicine.
期刊最新文献
Prophylaxis Options in Children With a History of Recurrent Urinary Tract Infections: A Systematic Review. Recurrent Urinary Tract Infection Prevention: Progress and Challenges. Rett Syndrome and the Broader Implications of the Use of Eponyms in Medicine. RSV Neutralizing Antibodies Following Nirsevimab and Palivizumab Dosing. ECMO Survivors' Reflections on Their ICU Experience and Recovery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1