适用于所有临床环境的快速平衡评估工具:匈牙利版特定活动平衡信心量表的有效性和可靠性。

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 REHABILITATION Physiotherapy Theory and Practice Pub Date : 2024-09-03 DOI:10.1080/09593985.2024.2396074
Brigitta Ruszin-Perecz, Alexandra Makai, Miklos Pozsgai, Nora Nusser, Endre Pal, Norbert Kovacs, Jozsef Janszky, Melinda Jaromi, Agnes Sebok
{"title":"适用于所有临床环境的快速平衡评估工具:匈牙利版特定活动平衡信心量表的有效性和可靠性。","authors":"Brigitta Ruszin-Perecz, Alexandra Makai, Miklos Pozsgai, Nora Nusser, Endre Pal, Norbert Kovacs, Jozsef Janszky, Melinda Jaromi, Agnes Sebok","doi":"10.1080/09593985.2024.2396074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Activities-specific Balance Confidence Scale was developed for testing the balance confidence of elderly individuals, and it has been used extensively for evaluating various patients. No such scale has been adapted for the Hungarian population.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To translate and culturally adapt the Activities-specific Balance Confidence Scale and test the reliability and validity of the Hungarian version.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study included 167 independently mobile subjects, of whom 39 filled in the questionnaire twice, 1 week apart. Beaton's six-step principle was applied for cross-cultural adaptation. Reliability was assessed by internal consistency measured by Cronbach's alpha and through test-retest analysis. Types of validity evaluated were concurrent validity using the Berg Balance Scale and cross-cultural validity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Excellent internal consistency was shown by Cronbach's alpha = 0.977. Test-retest analysis resulted in an Intra-Class Correlation Coefficient of 0.962 (0.865-0.961, 95% CI, <i>p</i> < .001) for the whole test; no floor or ceiling effects were found. The convergent validity of the scale was tested by Spearman's rank correlation analysis using the Berg Balance scale for external validation and showed a strong positive correlation (Rho = 0.755, <i>p</i> < .001). Receiver Operating Characteristic curve analysis showed an Area Under the Curve of 0.821 (CI 95% 0.75, 0.892). Mean detectable change based on the 95% confidence interval was 10.49% on the scale ranging from 0 to 100%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Hungarian version of the Activities-Specific Balance Confidence Scale provides a valid and reliable picture of the patients' self-assessed balance. It is recommended both for clinicians and for clinical studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":48699,"journal":{"name":"Physiotherapy Theory and Practice","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A quick balance assessment tool for all clinical settings: validity and reliability of the Hungarian version of the activities-specific balance confidence scale.\",\"authors\":\"Brigitta Ruszin-Perecz, Alexandra Makai, Miklos Pozsgai, Nora Nusser, Endre Pal, Norbert Kovacs, Jozsef Janszky, Melinda Jaromi, Agnes Sebok\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09593985.2024.2396074\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Activities-specific Balance Confidence Scale was developed for testing the balance confidence of elderly individuals, and it has been used extensively for evaluating various patients. No such scale has been adapted for the Hungarian population.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To translate and culturally adapt the Activities-specific Balance Confidence Scale and test the reliability and validity of the Hungarian version.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study included 167 independently mobile subjects, of whom 39 filled in the questionnaire twice, 1 week apart. Beaton's six-step principle was applied for cross-cultural adaptation. Reliability was assessed by internal consistency measured by Cronbach's alpha and through test-retest analysis. Types of validity evaluated were concurrent validity using the Berg Balance Scale and cross-cultural validity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Excellent internal consistency was shown by Cronbach's alpha = 0.977. Test-retest analysis resulted in an Intra-Class Correlation Coefficient of 0.962 (0.865-0.961, 95% CI, <i>p</i> < .001) for the whole test; no floor or ceiling effects were found. The convergent validity of the scale was tested by Spearman's rank correlation analysis using the Berg Balance scale for external validation and showed a strong positive correlation (Rho = 0.755, <i>p</i> < .001). Receiver Operating Characteristic curve analysis showed an Area Under the Curve of 0.821 (CI 95% 0.75, 0.892). Mean detectable change based on the 95% confidence interval was 10.49% on the scale ranging from 0 to 100%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Hungarian version of the Activities-Specific Balance Confidence Scale provides a valid and reliable picture of the patients' self-assessed balance. It is recommended both for clinicians and for clinical studies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48699,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physiotherapy Theory and Practice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-10\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physiotherapy Theory and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09593985.2024.2396074\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiotherapy Theory and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09593985.2024.2396074","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:特定活动平衡信心量表(Activities-specific Balance Confidence Scale)是为测试老年人的平衡信心而开发的,已被广泛用于评估各种病人。目前还没有针对匈牙利人的量表:翻译特定活动平衡信心量表并对其进行文化调整,测试匈牙利语版本的可靠性和有效性:研究对象包括 167 名独立行动的受试者,其中 39 人填写了两次问卷,每次间隔 1 周。在进行跨文化调整时,采用了比顿的六步原则。信度通过克朗巴赫阿尔法(Cronbach's alpha)测量的内部一致性和重复测试分析进行评估。评估的效度类型包括使用伯格平衡量表的并发效度和跨文化效度:结果:Cronbach's alpha = 0.977 表明内部一致性极佳。重测分析得出的类内相关系数为 0.962(0.865-0.961,95% CI,p p p):匈牙利版特定活动平衡信心量表能有效、可靠地反映患者的自我平衡评估。建议临床医生和临床研究使用该量表。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A quick balance assessment tool for all clinical settings: validity and reliability of the Hungarian version of the activities-specific balance confidence scale.

Background: The Activities-specific Balance Confidence Scale was developed for testing the balance confidence of elderly individuals, and it has been used extensively for evaluating various patients. No such scale has been adapted for the Hungarian population.

Objective: To translate and culturally adapt the Activities-specific Balance Confidence Scale and test the reliability and validity of the Hungarian version.

Methods: The study included 167 independently mobile subjects, of whom 39 filled in the questionnaire twice, 1 week apart. Beaton's six-step principle was applied for cross-cultural adaptation. Reliability was assessed by internal consistency measured by Cronbach's alpha and through test-retest analysis. Types of validity evaluated were concurrent validity using the Berg Balance Scale and cross-cultural validity.

Results: Excellent internal consistency was shown by Cronbach's alpha = 0.977. Test-retest analysis resulted in an Intra-Class Correlation Coefficient of 0.962 (0.865-0.961, 95% CI, p < .001) for the whole test; no floor or ceiling effects were found. The convergent validity of the scale was tested by Spearman's rank correlation analysis using the Berg Balance scale for external validation and showed a strong positive correlation (Rho = 0.755, p < .001). Receiver Operating Characteristic curve analysis showed an Area Under the Curve of 0.821 (CI 95% 0.75, 0.892). Mean detectable change based on the 95% confidence interval was 10.49% on the scale ranging from 0 to 100%.

Conclusions: The Hungarian version of the Activities-Specific Balance Confidence Scale provides a valid and reliable picture of the patients' self-assessed balance. It is recommended both for clinicians and for clinical studies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
300
期刊介绍: The aim of Physiotherapy Theory and Practice is to provide an international, peer-reviewed forum for the publication, dissemination, and discussion of recent developments and current research in physiotherapy/physical therapy. The journal accepts original quantitative and qualitative research reports, theoretical papers, systematic literature reviews, clinical case reports, and technical clinical notes. Physiotherapy Theory and Practice; promotes post-basic education through reports, reviews, and updates on all aspects of physiotherapy and specialties relating to clinical physiotherapy.
期刊最新文献
Exploring the workplace and workforce intentions of early career physiotherapists in Australia. Comparison of respiratory functions, muscle strength, and physical activity among children with primary ciliary dyskinesia with and without Kartagener's syndrome and healthy controls. Effects of matched vs. unmatched physical therapy interventions on pain or disability in patients with neck pain - a systematic review and meta-analysis. Effects of transcutaneous electrical diaphragmatic stimulation in critically ill elderly patients: a randomized controlled trial. Evaluating the reliability and validity of the Icelandic translation of the Mini-BESTest in rehabilitation patients: an international implication for balance assessment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1