上睑下垂修复手术后的复发:风险因素的多变量分析。

Pub Date : 2024-09-02 DOI:10.1080/01676830.2024.2396373
Adam R Sweeney, Christopher R Dermarkarian, Katherine J Williams, Richard C Allen, Michael T Yen
{"title":"上睑下垂修复手术后的复发:风险因素的多变量分析。","authors":"Adam R Sweeney, Christopher R Dermarkarian, Katherine J Williams, Richard C Allen, Michael T Yen","doi":"10.1080/01676830.2024.2396373","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To identify and evaluate the risk factors for ptosis repair failure.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective, case-controlled study evaluating adult patients with ptosis who underwent ptosis surgery by external levator advancement/resection (ELR) or Müller muscle conjunctival resection (MMCR) with at least 3 months postoperative follow-up. Regression analyses were performed of ptosis repair outcomes comparing preoperative and perioperative risk factors for failure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 240 patients (404 eyelids) met the inclusion criteria for the study. Surgical outcomes were measured categorically by success rate and measured quantitively over time using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Success was categorically achieved in 101/112 (90%) eyelids after MMCR and 231/292 (79%) eyelids after ELR (<i>p</i> = .0088). Success as measured over 5 years of follow-up was significantly better in eyelids following MMCR compared to ELR (<i>p</i> = .0469). In terms of surgical failure, the following variables were found to be predictive in order of decreasing risk: chronic topical prostaglandin use, chronic topical corticosteroid use, surgical approach, lower preoperative margin reflex distance 1, prior intraocular surgery, age, lower preoperative levator function, concomitant blepharoplasty, presence of a glaucoma filtering bleb, and female gender.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Ptosis repair surgery is a complex and challenging procedure. This study provides the largest comparative analysis of ELR versus MMCR to date with findings suggesting MMCR to be more a successful surgery than ELR. Topical prostaglandin analogue use appears to be the highest known risk factor for MMCR and ELR ptosis repair failure.</p>","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Recurrence following ptosis repair surgery: a multivariate analysis of risk factors.\",\"authors\":\"Adam R Sweeney, Christopher R Dermarkarian, Katherine J Williams, Richard C Allen, Michael T Yen\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/01676830.2024.2396373\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To identify and evaluate the risk factors for ptosis repair failure.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective, case-controlled study evaluating adult patients with ptosis who underwent ptosis surgery by external levator advancement/resection (ELR) or Müller muscle conjunctival resection (MMCR) with at least 3 months postoperative follow-up. Regression analyses were performed of ptosis repair outcomes comparing preoperative and perioperative risk factors for failure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 240 patients (404 eyelids) met the inclusion criteria for the study. Surgical outcomes were measured categorically by success rate and measured quantitively over time using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Success was categorically achieved in 101/112 (90%) eyelids after MMCR and 231/292 (79%) eyelids after ELR (<i>p</i> = .0088). Success as measured over 5 years of follow-up was significantly better in eyelids following MMCR compared to ELR (<i>p</i> = .0469). In terms of surgical failure, the following variables were found to be predictive in order of decreasing risk: chronic topical prostaglandin use, chronic topical corticosteroid use, surgical approach, lower preoperative margin reflex distance 1, prior intraocular surgery, age, lower preoperative levator function, concomitant blepharoplasty, presence of a glaucoma filtering bleb, and female gender.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Ptosis repair surgery is a complex and challenging procedure. This study provides the largest comparative analysis of ELR versus MMCR to date with findings suggesting MMCR to be more a successful surgery than ELR. Topical prostaglandin analogue use appears to be the highest known risk factor for MMCR and ELR ptosis repair failure.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":0,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/01676830.2024.2396373\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01676830.2024.2396373","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:确定并评估上睑下垂修复失败的风险因素:回顾性病例对照研究:评估通过外上睑提肌前移/切除术(ELR)或缪勒肌结膜切除术(MMCR)接受上睑下垂手术且术后随访至少3个月的成年上睑下垂患者。对上睑下垂修复结果进行回归分析,比较术前和围手术期的失败风险因素:共有 240 名患者(404 个眼睑)符合研究的纳入标准。手术结果以成功率进行分类测量,并使用卡普兰-米尔生存分析法对不同时间段的手术结果进行量化测量。101/112(90%)个眼睑在 MMCR 术后获得成功,231/292(79%)个眼睑在 ELR 术后获得成功(p = .0088)。在5年的随访中,MMCR术后眼睑的成功率明显高于ELR术后眼睑的成功率(p = .0469)。就手术失败而言,以下变量按风险递减顺序具有预测性:长期外用前列腺素、长期外用皮质类固醇、手术方法、术前较低的边缘反射距离1、之前的眼内手术、年龄、术前较低的上睑提肌功能、同时进行的眼睑成形术、存在青光眼滤过性眼泡和女性性别:上睑下垂修复手术是一项复杂且具有挑战性的手术。本研究提供了迄今为止最大规模的ELR与MMCR的对比分析,结果表明MMCR比ELR是更成功的手术。局部使用前列腺素类似物似乎是MMCR和ELR上睑下垂修复失败的最高风险因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
Recurrence following ptosis repair surgery: a multivariate analysis of risk factors.

Purpose: To identify and evaluate the risk factors for ptosis repair failure.

Methods: Retrospective, case-controlled study evaluating adult patients with ptosis who underwent ptosis surgery by external levator advancement/resection (ELR) or Müller muscle conjunctival resection (MMCR) with at least 3 months postoperative follow-up. Regression analyses were performed of ptosis repair outcomes comparing preoperative and perioperative risk factors for failure.

Results: A total of 240 patients (404 eyelids) met the inclusion criteria for the study. Surgical outcomes were measured categorically by success rate and measured quantitively over time using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Success was categorically achieved in 101/112 (90%) eyelids after MMCR and 231/292 (79%) eyelids after ELR (p = .0088). Success as measured over 5 years of follow-up was significantly better in eyelids following MMCR compared to ELR (p = .0469). In terms of surgical failure, the following variables were found to be predictive in order of decreasing risk: chronic topical prostaglandin use, chronic topical corticosteroid use, surgical approach, lower preoperative margin reflex distance 1, prior intraocular surgery, age, lower preoperative levator function, concomitant blepharoplasty, presence of a glaucoma filtering bleb, and female gender.

Conclusions: Ptosis repair surgery is a complex and challenging procedure. This study provides the largest comparative analysis of ELR versus MMCR to date with findings suggesting MMCR to be more a successful surgery than ELR. Topical prostaglandin analogue use appears to be the highest known risk factor for MMCR and ELR ptosis repair failure.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1