前负荷增加和舒张功能的超声心动图评估。

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Echocardiography-A Journal of Cardiovascular Ultrasound and Allied Techniques Pub Date : 2024-09-03 DOI:10.1111/echo.15917
Ida Arentz Taraldsen MD, Rasmus Mogelvang MD, PhD, Frederik Fasth Grund MD, PhD, Christian Hassager MD, DMSc, Peter Søgaard MD, DMSc, Charlotte Burup Kristensen MD, PhD
{"title":"前负荷增加和舒张功能的超声心动图评估。","authors":"Ida Arentz Taraldsen MD,&nbsp;Rasmus Mogelvang MD, PhD,&nbsp;Frederik Fasth Grund MD, PhD,&nbsp;Christian Hassager MD, DMSc,&nbsp;Peter Søgaard MD, DMSc,&nbsp;Charlotte Burup Kristensen MD, PhD","doi":"10.1111/echo.15917","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aims</h3>\n \n <p>Echocardiographic diastolic parameters are used to diagnose and monitor increased left ventricular filling pressure (LVFP) and we hypothesized that increased loading conditions cause increased E/e′. Our aim was to assess the effect of preload augmentation on diastolic parameters among both healthy subjects and subjects with known cardiac disease.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods and results</h3>\n \n <p>We included 129 subjects merged from two cohorts; one dialysis cohort (<i>n</i> = 47) and one infusion cohort (<i>n</i> = 82). Echocardiography was performed immediately before and after hemodialysis (HD) or saline infusion, under low and high loading conditions. Elevated LVFP was defined as septal E/e′ ≥ 15 and/or lateral E/e′ ≥ 13 at high-loading conditions. The population was divided according to elevated LVFP (<i>n</i> = 31) and normal LVFP (<i>n</i> = 98). The load difference for the population was 972 ± 460 mL, with no differences in load difference between elevated and normal LVFP (<i>p NS</i>). The subjects with elevated LVFP were older (63 ± 11 vs. 46 ± 16 years, <i>p &lt;</i> .001), and had lower LV ejection fraction (50 ± 14 vs. 59 ± 8.1%, <i>p &lt;</i> .01). After augmented preload, EDV increased in the normal LVFP group (<i>p &lt;</i> .01) but remained unchanged in the elevated LVFP group (<i>p NS</i>). Both E and e′ increased among the subjects with normal LVFP, whereas E/e′ remained unchanged (∆E/e′ +.1 [-.5–1.2]), <i>p NS</i>). Among the subjects with elevated, LVFP we observed increased E but not e′, resulting in significantly increased E/e′ (∆ average E/e′ +2.4 [0–4.0], <i>p</i> <i>&lt;</i> .01).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Augmented preload does not seem to affect E/e′ among subjects with normal LVFP, whereas E/e′ seems to increase significantly among subjects with elevated LVFP.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50558,"journal":{"name":"Echocardiography-A Journal of Cardiovascular Ultrasound and Allied Techniques","volume":"41 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/echo.15917","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Increased preload and echocardiographic assessment of diastolic function\",\"authors\":\"Ida Arentz Taraldsen MD,&nbsp;Rasmus Mogelvang MD, PhD,&nbsp;Frederik Fasth Grund MD, PhD,&nbsp;Christian Hassager MD, DMSc,&nbsp;Peter Søgaard MD, DMSc,&nbsp;Charlotte Burup Kristensen MD, PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/echo.15917\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Aims</h3>\\n \\n <p>Echocardiographic diastolic parameters are used to diagnose and monitor increased left ventricular filling pressure (LVFP) and we hypothesized that increased loading conditions cause increased E/e′. Our aim was to assess the effect of preload augmentation on diastolic parameters among both healthy subjects and subjects with known cardiac disease.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods and results</h3>\\n \\n <p>We included 129 subjects merged from two cohorts; one dialysis cohort (<i>n</i> = 47) and one infusion cohort (<i>n</i> = 82). Echocardiography was performed immediately before and after hemodialysis (HD) or saline infusion, under low and high loading conditions. Elevated LVFP was defined as septal E/e′ ≥ 15 and/or lateral E/e′ ≥ 13 at high-loading conditions. The population was divided according to elevated LVFP (<i>n</i> = 31) and normal LVFP (<i>n</i> = 98). The load difference for the population was 972 ± 460 mL, with no differences in load difference between elevated and normal LVFP (<i>p NS</i>). The subjects with elevated LVFP were older (63 ± 11 vs. 46 ± 16 years, <i>p &lt;</i> .001), and had lower LV ejection fraction (50 ± 14 vs. 59 ± 8.1%, <i>p &lt;</i> .01). After augmented preload, EDV increased in the normal LVFP group (<i>p &lt;</i> .01) but remained unchanged in the elevated LVFP group (<i>p NS</i>). Both E and e′ increased among the subjects with normal LVFP, whereas E/e′ remained unchanged (∆E/e′ +.1 [-.5–1.2]), <i>p NS</i>). Among the subjects with elevated, LVFP we observed increased E but not e′, resulting in significantly increased E/e′ (∆ average E/e′ +2.4 [0–4.0], <i>p</i> <i>&lt;</i> .01).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Augmented preload does not seem to affect E/e′ among subjects with normal LVFP, whereas E/e′ seems to increase significantly among subjects with elevated LVFP.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50558,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Echocardiography-A Journal of Cardiovascular Ultrasound and Allied Techniques\",\"volume\":\"41 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/echo.15917\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Echocardiography-A Journal of Cardiovascular Ultrasound and Allied Techniques\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/echo.15917\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Echocardiography-A Journal of Cardiovascular Ultrasound and Allied Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/echo.15917","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:超声心动图舒张参数用于诊断和监测左心室充盈压(LVFP)增高,我们假设负荷增加会导致E/e'增高。我们的目的是评估前负荷增加对健康受试者和已知心脏病受试者舒张参数的影响:我们纳入了从两个队列合并而来的 129 名受试者;一个透析队列(n = 47)和一个输液队列(n = 82)。在低负荷和高负荷条件下,在血液透析(HD)或输注生理盐水前后立即进行超声心动图检查。在高负荷条件下,室间隔E/e'≥15和/或侧壁E/e'≥13定义为LVFP升高。根据 LVFP 升高(n = 31)和 LVFP 正常(n = 98)划分人群。人群的负荷差为 972 ± 460 mL,LVFP 升高和正常之间的负荷差没有差异(p NS)。LVFP 升高的受试者年龄更大(63 ± 11 岁 vs. 46 ± 16 岁,p 结论:LVFP 升高的受试者年龄更大(63 ± 11 岁 vs. 46 ± 16 岁,p 结论):在 LVFP 正常的受试者中,增加前负荷似乎不会影响 E/e',而在 LVFP 升高的受试者中,E/e'似乎会显著增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Increased preload and echocardiographic assessment of diastolic function

Aims

Echocardiographic diastolic parameters are used to diagnose and monitor increased left ventricular filling pressure (LVFP) and we hypothesized that increased loading conditions cause increased E/e′. Our aim was to assess the effect of preload augmentation on diastolic parameters among both healthy subjects and subjects with known cardiac disease.

Methods and results

We included 129 subjects merged from two cohorts; one dialysis cohort (n = 47) and one infusion cohort (n = 82). Echocardiography was performed immediately before and after hemodialysis (HD) or saline infusion, under low and high loading conditions. Elevated LVFP was defined as septal E/e′ ≥ 15 and/or lateral E/e′ ≥ 13 at high-loading conditions. The population was divided according to elevated LVFP (n = 31) and normal LVFP (n = 98). The load difference for the population was 972 ± 460 mL, with no differences in load difference between elevated and normal LVFP (p NS). The subjects with elevated LVFP were older (63 ± 11 vs. 46 ± 16 years, p < .001), and had lower LV ejection fraction (50 ± 14 vs. 59 ± 8.1%, p < .01). After augmented preload, EDV increased in the normal LVFP group (p < .01) but remained unchanged in the elevated LVFP group (p NS). Both E and e′ increased among the subjects with normal LVFP, whereas E/e′ remained unchanged (∆E/e′ +.1 [-.5–1.2]), p NS). Among the subjects with elevated, LVFP we observed increased E but not e′, resulting in significantly increased E/e′ (∆ average E/e′ +2.4 [0–4.0], p < .01).

Conclusion

Augmented preload does not seem to affect E/e′ among subjects with normal LVFP, whereas E/e′ seems to increase significantly among subjects with elevated LVFP.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
6.70%
发文量
211
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Echocardiography: A Journal of Cardiovascular Ultrasound and Allied Techniques is the official publication of the International Society of Cardiovascular Ultrasound. Widely recognized for its comprehensive peer-reviewed articles, case studies, original research, and reviews by international authors. Echocardiography keeps its readership of echocardiographers, ultrasound specialists, and cardiologists well informed of the latest developments in the field.
期刊最新文献
Incidental Finding of a Myxoma of Unusual Location in an Elderly Patient. A Novel 2D Echo View to Determine Right Ventricular Lead Position on the Tricuspid Valve Level Overlapping Strain Patterns in Patients With Cardiac Amyloidosis and End-Stage Renal Disease Takotsubo Cardiomyopathy Following MitraClip Procedure: Focus On Issue Information
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1