炎症性肠病饮食建议在线信息质量评估。

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES DIGITAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2024-08-30 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/20552076241277033
Yan Liu, Le He, Hong Guo, Lingya Xiang, Xiaomei Song, Wei Tan
{"title":"炎症性肠病饮食建议在线信息质量评估。","authors":"Yan Liu, Le He, Hong Guo, Lingya Xiang, Xiaomei Song, Wei Tan","doi":"10.1177/20552076241277033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The internet has become a preferred source for people seeking health information, including diet recommendations which are pivotal in the management of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Hence, we aimed to assess the quality of online information in China regarding IBD dietary recommendations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The search engines Baidu and Bing were used to screen for their top 25 webpages using the keywords \"inflammatory bowel disease diet,\" \"ulcerative colitis diet,\" \"Crohn's disease diet,\" \"inflammatory bowel disease nutrition,\" \"ulcerative colitis nutrition,\" and \"Crohn's disease nutrition.\" The quality of information was assessed by two physicians according to the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) benchmark, the Global Quality Score (GQS), and the DISCERN instrument.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred and eight webpages were selected for evaluation. The mean scores for JAMA, GQS, and DISCERN were 1.48, 3.11, and 36.20, respectively. Articles from professionals and non-profit organizations demonstrated superior quality compared to those from commercial and health portal websites. Many webpages failed to provide an explicit source of information or support for shared decision-making. The information on several pages lacked comprehensive descriptions of food types for IBD, with some pages even containing inaccuracies. No statistically significant differences in scores were observed between Baidu and Bing.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The quality of online information on IBD dietary recommendations in China is moderate to low and exhibits significant variation across different sources. This warrants joint efforts from online authors, internet platforms, and regulators, to improve the quality of popular medical information.</p>","PeriodicalId":51333,"journal":{"name":"DIGITAL HEALTH","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11367597/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of the quality of online information on dietary recommendations for inflammatory bowel disease.\",\"authors\":\"Yan Liu, Le He, Hong Guo, Lingya Xiang, Xiaomei Song, Wei Tan\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/20552076241277033\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The internet has become a preferred source for people seeking health information, including diet recommendations which are pivotal in the management of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Hence, we aimed to assess the quality of online information in China regarding IBD dietary recommendations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The search engines Baidu and Bing were used to screen for their top 25 webpages using the keywords \\\"inflammatory bowel disease diet,\\\" \\\"ulcerative colitis diet,\\\" \\\"Crohn's disease diet,\\\" \\\"inflammatory bowel disease nutrition,\\\" \\\"ulcerative colitis nutrition,\\\" and \\\"Crohn's disease nutrition.\\\" The quality of information was assessed by two physicians according to the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) benchmark, the Global Quality Score (GQS), and the DISCERN instrument.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred and eight webpages were selected for evaluation. The mean scores for JAMA, GQS, and DISCERN were 1.48, 3.11, and 36.20, respectively. Articles from professionals and non-profit organizations demonstrated superior quality compared to those from commercial and health portal websites. Many webpages failed to provide an explicit source of information or support for shared decision-making. The information on several pages lacked comprehensive descriptions of food types for IBD, with some pages even containing inaccuracies. No statistically significant differences in scores were observed between Baidu and Bing.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The quality of online information on IBD dietary recommendations in China is moderate to low and exhibits significant variation across different sources. This warrants joint efforts from online authors, internet platforms, and regulators, to improve the quality of popular medical information.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51333,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"DIGITAL HEALTH\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11367597/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"DIGITAL HEALTH\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076241277033\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DIGITAL HEALTH","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076241277033","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:互联网已成为人们寻求健康信息的首选渠道,其中包括对炎症性肠病(IBD)治疗至关重要的饮食建议。因此,我们旨在评估中国有关 IBD 饮食建议的网络信息质量:方法:使用百度和必应搜索引擎,以 "炎症性肠病饮食"、"溃疡性结肠炎饮食"、"克罗恩病饮食"、"炎症性肠病营养"、"溃疡性结肠炎营养 "和 "克罗恩病营养 "为关键词,筛选出排名前 25 位的网页。信息质量由两名医生根据《美国医学会杂志》(JAMA)基准、全球质量评分(GQS)和 DISCERN 工具进行评估:结果:共选取了 108 个网页进行评估。JAMA、GQS 和 DISCERN 的平均得分分别为 1.48、3.11 和 36.20。与来自商业网站和健康门户网站的文章相比,来自专业人士和非营利组织的文章质量更高。许多网页未能为共同决策提供明确的信息来源或支持。一些网页上的信息缺乏对IBD食物类型的全面描述,有些网页甚至存在不准确之处。百度和必应之间的得分差异没有统计学意义:结论:在中国,有关 IBD 饮食建议的在线信息质量处于中等偏下水平,不同来源的信息质量差异很大。这需要网络作者、网络平台和监管机构共同努力,提高大众医疗信息的质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Assessment of the quality of online information on dietary recommendations for inflammatory bowel disease.

Objective: The internet has become a preferred source for people seeking health information, including diet recommendations which are pivotal in the management of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Hence, we aimed to assess the quality of online information in China regarding IBD dietary recommendations.

Methods: The search engines Baidu and Bing were used to screen for their top 25 webpages using the keywords "inflammatory bowel disease diet," "ulcerative colitis diet," "Crohn's disease diet," "inflammatory bowel disease nutrition," "ulcerative colitis nutrition," and "Crohn's disease nutrition." The quality of information was assessed by two physicians according to the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) benchmark, the Global Quality Score (GQS), and the DISCERN instrument.

Results: One hundred and eight webpages were selected for evaluation. The mean scores for JAMA, GQS, and DISCERN were 1.48, 3.11, and 36.20, respectively. Articles from professionals and non-profit organizations demonstrated superior quality compared to those from commercial and health portal websites. Many webpages failed to provide an explicit source of information or support for shared decision-making. The information on several pages lacked comprehensive descriptions of food types for IBD, with some pages even containing inaccuracies. No statistically significant differences in scores were observed between Baidu and Bing.

Conclusions: The quality of online information on IBD dietary recommendations in China is moderate to low and exhibits significant variation across different sources. This warrants joint efforts from online authors, internet platforms, and regulators, to improve the quality of popular medical information.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
DIGITAL HEALTH
DIGITAL HEALTH Multiple-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
7.70%
发文量
302
期刊最新文献
A feasibility study on utilizing machine learning technology to reduce the costs of gastric cancer screening in Taizhou, China. Ageing well with tech: Exploring the determinants of e-healthcare services adoption in an emerging economy. Chinese colposcopists' attitudes toward the colposcopic artificial intelligence auxiliary diagnostic system (CAIADS): A nation-wide, multi-center survey. Digital leadership: Norwegian healthcare managers' attitudes towards using digital tools. Disease characteristics influence the privacy calculus to adopt electronic health records: A survey study in Germany.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1