晚期非小细胞肺癌初始免疫疗法后肿瘤进展的治疗方案:真实世界研究

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology Neoplasia Pub Date : 2024-09-02 DOI:10.1016/j.neo.2024.101043
{"title":"晚期非小细胞肺癌初始免疫疗法后肿瘤进展的治疗方案:真实世界研究","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.neo.2024.101043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Whether to continue administering immunotherapy to patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who have experienced tumor progression remains controversial after immunotherapy. The aims were to explore survival outcomes after further immunotherapy post-progression and to determine the optimal combination therapy in such cases.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Overall, 507 patients with NSCLC who underwent immunotherapy and experienced tumor progression were retrospectively divided into Immuno-combination and No-immuno groups according to whether additional combination therapy involving immunotherapy was administered post-progression. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated. Subgroup analyses were performed according to the different treatment regimens for patients in the Immuno-combination group.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>After propensity score matching, there were 150 patients in the No-immuno group and 300 patients in the Immuno combination group. Superior PFS was observed in the Immuno-combination group compared with those in the No-immuno group (6-month PFS: 25.3 % vs. 60.6 %; 12-month PFS: 6.7 % vs. 24.4 %; P &lt; 0.001). Similar intergroup differences were observed for OS (12-month OS: 22.3 % vs. 69.4 %; 18-month OS: 6.4 % vs. 40.4 %; P &lt; 0.001). Superior PFS outcomes were observed in the Immuno+Antiangiogenic group compared with the Immuno+Chemo group (6-month PFS: 51.3 % vs. 71.5 %; 12-month PFS: 23.1 % vs. 25.7 %; P = 0.017). Similar differences in OS were observed between those same subgroups (12-month OS: 62.1 % vs. 77.9 %; 18-month OS: 33.3 % vs. 48.7 %; P = 0.006).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Patients with NSCLC experiencing tumor progression post-immunotherapy can still benefit from further treatment, with immunotherapy combined with antiangiogenic therapy the most efficacious option.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":18917,"journal":{"name":"Neoplasia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S147655862400085X/pdfft?md5=cb5bb2d4a078a5df9e84a5bd503cc8ec&pid=1-s2.0-S147655862400085X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Treatment options for tumor progression after initial immunotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: A real-world study\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.neo.2024.101043\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Whether to continue administering immunotherapy to patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who have experienced tumor progression remains controversial after immunotherapy. The aims were to explore survival outcomes after further immunotherapy post-progression and to determine the optimal combination therapy in such cases.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Overall, 507 patients with NSCLC who underwent immunotherapy and experienced tumor progression were retrospectively divided into Immuno-combination and No-immuno groups according to whether additional combination therapy involving immunotherapy was administered post-progression. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated. Subgroup analyses were performed according to the different treatment regimens for patients in the Immuno-combination group.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>After propensity score matching, there were 150 patients in the No-immuno group and 300 patients in the Immuno combination group. Superior PFS was observed in the Immuno-combination group compared with those in the No-immuno group (6-month PFS: 25.3 % vs. 60.6 %; 12-month PFS: 6.7 % vs. 24.4 %; P &lt; 0.001). Similar intergroup differences were observed for OS (12-month OS: 22.3 % vs. 69.4 %; 18-month OS: 6.4 % vs. 40.4 %; P &lt; 0.001). Superior PFS outcomes were observed in the Immuno+Antiangiogenic group compared with the Immuno+Chemo group (6-month PFS: 51.3 % vs. 71.5 %; 12-month PFS: 23.1 % vs. 25.7 %; P = 0.017). Similar differences in OS were observed between those same subgroups (12-month OS: 62.1 % vs. 77.9 %; 18-month OS: 33.3 % vs. 48.7 %; P = 0.006).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Patients with NSCLC experiencing tumor progression post-immunotherapy can still benefit from further treatment, with immunotherapy combined with antiangiogenic therapy the most efficacious option.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18917,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neoplasia\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S147655862400085X/pdfft?md5=cb5bb2d4a078a5df9e84a5bd503cc8ec&pid=1-s2.0-S147655862400085X-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neoplasia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S147655862400085X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neoplasia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S147655862400085X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者在接受免疫治疗后出现肿瘤进展,是否继续接受免疫治疗仍存在争议。方法回顾性地将 507 例接受免疫治疗并出现肿瘤进展的 NSCLC 患者根据进展后是否继续接受免疫治疗分为免疫联合组和非免疫组。对无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)进行了评估。根据免疫联合组患者的不同治疗方案进行了分组分析。结果经过倾向评分匹配后,无免疫组有150名患者,免疫联合组有300名患者。与未免疫组相比,免疫组合组的 PFS 更优(6 个月 PFS:25.3% 对 60.6%;12 个月 PFS:6.7% 对 24.4%;P <;0.001)。在 OS 方面也观察到了类似的组间差异(12 个月 OS:22.3% 对 69.4%;18 个月 OS:6.4% 对 40.4%;P <;0.001)。与免疫+化疗组相比,免疫+抗血管生成组的PFS结果更好(6个月PFS:51.3% vs. 71.5%;12个月PFS:23.1% vs. 25.7%;P = 0.017)。结论免疫治疗后肿瘤进展的NSCLC患者仍可从进一步治疗中获益,免疫治疗联合抗血管生成治疗是最有效的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Treatment options for tumor progression after initial immunotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: A real-world study

Objective

Whether to continue administering immunotherapy to patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who have experienced tumor progression remains controversial after immunotherapy. The aims were to explore survival outcomes after further immunotherapy post-progression and to determine the optimal combination therapy in such cases.

Methods

Overall, 507 patients with NSCLC who underwent immunotherapy and experienced tumor progression were retrospectively divided into Immuno-combination and No-immuno groups according to whether additional combination therapy involving immunotherapy was administered post-progression. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated. Subgroup analyses were performed according to the different treatment regimens for patients in the Immuno-combination group.

Results

After propensity score matching, there were 150 patients in the No-immuno group and 300 patients in the Immuno combination group. Superior PFS was observed in the Immuno-combination group compared with those in the No-immuno group (6-month PFS: 25.3 % vs. 60.6 %; 12-month PFS: 6.7 % vs. 24.4 %; P < 0.001). Similar intergroup differences were observed for OS (12-month OS: 22.3 % vs. 69.4 %; 18-month OS: 6.4 % vs. 40.4 %; P < 0.001). Superior PFS outcomes were observed in the Immuno+Antiangiogenic group compared with the Immuno+Chemo group (6-month PFS: 51.3 % vs. 71.5 %; 12-month PFS: 23.1 % vs. 25.7 %; P = 0.017). Similar differences in OS were observed between those same subgroups (12-month OS: 62.1 % vs. 77.9 %; 18-month OS: 33.3 % vs. 48.7 %; P = 0.006).

Conclusion

Patients with NSCLC experiencing tumor progression post-immunotherapy can still benefit from further treatment, with immunotherapy combined with antiangiogenic therapy the most efficacious option.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neoplasia
Neoplasia 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
2.10%
发文量
82
审稿时长
26 days
期刊介绍: Neoplasia publishes the results of novel investigations in all areas of oncology research. The title Neoplasia was chosen to convey the journal’s breadth, which encompasses the traditional disciplines of cancer research as well as emerging fields and interdisciplinary investigations. Neoplasia is interested in studies describing new molecular and genetic findings relating to the neoplastic phenotype and in laboratory and clinical studies demonstrating creative applications of advances in the basic sciences to risk assessment, prognostic indications, detection, diagnosis, and treatment. In addition to regular Research Reports, Neoplasia also publishes Reviews and Meeting Reports. Neoplasia is committed to ensuring a thorough, fair, and rapid review and publication schedule to further its mission of serving both the scientific and clinical communities by disseminating important data and ideas in cancer research.
期刊最新文献
Clinical and genetic profile of Chinese patients with indolent natural killer-cell lymphoproliferative disorder of the gastrointestinal tract Oncolytic adenovirus MEM-288 encoding membrane-stable CD40L and IFNβ induces an anti-tumor immune response in high grade serous ovarian cancer Probing the glioma micro-environment: Analysis using biopsy in combination with ultra-fast cyclic immunolabeling ELAVL1 regulates PD-L1 mRNA stability to disrupt the infiltration of CD4-positive T cells in prostate cancer Unveiling the impact of SUMOylation at K298 site of heat shock factor 1 on glioblastoma malignant progression
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1