了解美国竹纤维的潜力:通过机械和化学工艺生产竹纤维的综合技术经济比较

IF 3.2 4区 生物学 Q2 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY Biofuels Bioproducts & Biorefining-Biofpr Pub Date : 2024-06-26 DOI:10.1002/bbb.2652
Keren A. Vivas, Alonzo Pifano, Ramon E. Vera, Fernando Urdaneta, Isabel Urdaneta, Naycari Forfora, Camilla Abbati de Assis, Richard B. Phillips, Sudipta Dasmohapatra, Daniel Saloni, Richard A. Venditti, Ronalds Gonzalez
{"title":"了解美国竹纤维的潜力:通过机械和化学工艺生产竹纤维的综合技术经济比较","authors":"Keren A. Vivas,&nbsp;Alonzo Pifano,&nbsp;Ramon E. Vera,&nbsp;Fernando Urdaneta,&nbsp;Isabel Urdaneta,&nbsp;Naycari Forfora,&nbsp;Camilla Abbati de Assis,&nbsp;Richard B. Phillips,&nbsp;Sudipta Dasmohapatra,&nbsp;Daniel Saloni,&nbsp;Richard A. Venditti,&nbsp;Ronalds Gonzalez","doi":"10.1002/bbb.2652","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The growing interest in bamboo fibers for pulp, paper, and board production in the USA necessitates a comprehensive financial viability assessment. This study conducts a detailed technoeconomic analysis (TEA) of bamboo fiber production, primarily for the consumer hygiene tissue market although it is also applicable to other industrial uses. The economic viability of two pulping methods – alkaline peroxide mechanical pulping (APMP) and ammonium bisulfite chemical pulping (ABS) – was explored within three different pulp mill settings to supply pulp to two nonintegrated tissue and towel mills in South Carolina, USA. The target was to produce wet lap bamboo bleached pulp at 50% consistency and 70% ISO brightness. Despite higher initial capital invesment and operating costs, ABS achieved a lower minimum required selling price – USD 544 to 686 per bone dry metric ton (BDt = 1000 BDkg) – in comparison with USD 766 to 899 BDt<sup>−1</sup> for APMP. This price advantage is partly due to an additional revenue stream (lignosulfonate byproduct), which not only boosts revenue but also circumvents the need for expensive chemical recovery systems. When compared with traditional kraft pulping, both methods require significantly lower capital investments, with minimum required selling prices (estimated to achieve 16% IRR) below current market rates for extensively used bleached kraft pulps in the USA tissue industry. The economic benefits derive from several factors: the low cost of bamboo as raw material, reduced capital needs for new pulping technologies, lower transportation costs from the pulp mill to tissue and towel manufacturing facilities, and the high market price of bleached kraft pulp.</p>","PeriodicalId":55380,"journal":{"name":"Biofuels Bioproducts & Biorefining-Biofpr","volume":"18 5","pages":"1565-1584"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/bbb.2652","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Understanding the potential of bamboo fibers in the USA: A comprehensive techno-economic comparison of bamboo fiber production through mechanical and chemical processes\",\"authors\":\"Keren A. Vivas,&nbsp;Alonzo Pifano,&nbsp;Ramon E. Vera,&nbsp;Fernando Urdaneta,&nbsp;Isabel Urdaneta,&nbsp;Naycari Forfora,&nbsp;Camilla Abbati de Assis,&nbsp;Richard B. Phillips,&nbsp;Sudipta Dasmohapatra,&nbsp;Daniel Saloni,&nbsp;Richard A. Venditti,&nbsp;Ronalds Gonzalez\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/bbb.2652\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The growing interest in bamboo fibers for pulp, paper, and board production in the USA necessitates a comprehensive financial viability assessment. This study conducts a detailed technoeconomic analysis (TEA) of bamboo fiber production, primarily for the consumer hygiene tissue market although it is also applicable to other industrial uses. The economic viability of two pulping methods – alkaline peroxide mechanical pulping (APMP) and ammonium bisulfite chemical pulping (ABS) – was explored within three different pulp mill settings to supply pulp to two nonintegrated tissue and towel mills in South Carolina, USA. The target was to produce wet lap bamboo bleached pulp at 50% consistency and 70% ISO brightness. Despite higher initial capital invesment and operating costs, ABS achieved a lower minimum required selling price – USD 544 to 686 per bone dry metric ton (BDt = 1000 BDkg) – in comparison with USD 766 to 899 BDt<sup>−1</sup> for APMP. This price advantage is partly due to an additional revenue stream (lignosulfonate byproduct), which not only boosts revenue but also circumvents the need for expensive chemical recovery systems. When compared with traditional kraft pulping, both methods require significantly lower capital investments, with minimum required selling prices (estimated to achieve 16% IRR) below current market rates for extensively used bleached kraft pulps in the USA tissue industry. The economic benefits derive from several factors: the low cost of bamboo as raw material, reduced capital needs for new pulping technologies, lower transportation costs from the pulp mill to tissue and towel manufacturing facilities, and the high market price of bleached kraft pulp.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55380,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biofuels Bioproducts & Biorefining-Biofpr\",\"volume\":\"18 5\",\"pages\":\"1565-1584\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/bbb.2652\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biofuels Bioproducts & Biorefining-Biofpr\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bbb.2652\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biofuels Bioproducts & Biorefining-Biofpr","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bbb.2652","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在美国,人们对用于纸浆、纸张和纸板生产的竹纤维越来越感兴趣,因此有必要对其进行全面的财务可行性评估。本研究对竹纤维生产进行了详细的技术经济分析(TEA),主要针对消费者卫生纸市场,但也适用于其他工业用途。研究探讨了碱性过氧化物机械制浆(APMP)和亚硫酸氢铵化学制浆(ABS)这两种制浆方法在三种不同浆厂环境下的经济可行性,为美国南卡罗来纳州的两家非一体化卫生纸和毛巾厂提供纸浆。目标是生产浓度为 50%、ISO 白度为 70% 的湿法竹漂浆。尽管初始资本投资和运营成本较高,但与 APMP 的 766 至 899 BDt-1 相比,ABS 实现了较低的最低销售价格要求 - 544 至 686 美元/骨干公吨(BDt = 1000 BDkg)。这一价格优势的部分原因在于额外的收入来源(木质素磺酸盐副产品),这不仅增加了收入,还避免了对昂贵的化学回收系统的需求。与传统的牛皮浆制浆法相比,这两种制浆法所需的资本投资都要低得多,其最低要求售价(估计可实现 16% 的内部收益率)也低于目前美国卫生纸行业广泛使用的漂白牛皮浆的市场价格。经济效益来源于以下几个因素:竹子作为原材料的低成本、减少对新制浆技术的资本需求、降低从纸浆厂到卫生纸和毛巾生产厂的运输成本以及漂白牛皮浆的高市场价格。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Understanding the potential of bamboo fibers in the USA: A comprehensive techno-economic comparison of bamboo fiber production through mechanical and chemical processes

The growing interest in bamboo fibers for pulp, paper, and board production in the USA necessitates a comprehensive financial viability assessment. This study conducts a detailed technoeconomic analysis (TEA) of bamboo fiber production, primarily for the consumer hygiene tissue market although it is also applicable to other industrial uses. The economic viability of two pulping methods – alkaline peroxide mechanical pulping (APMP) and ammonium bisulfite chemical pulping (ABS) – was explored within three different pulp mill settings to supply pulp to two nonintegrated tissue and towel mills in South Carolina, USA. The target was to produce wet lap bamboo bleached pulp at 50% consistency and 70% ISO brightness. Despite higher initial capital invesment and operating costs, ABS achieved a lower minimum required selling price – USD 544 to 686 per bone dry metric ton (BDt = 1000 BDkg) – in comparison with USD 766 to 899 BDt−1 for APMP. This price advantage is partly due to an additional revenue stream (lignosulfonate byproduct), which not only boosts revenue but also circumvents the need for expensive chemical recovery systems. When compared with traditional kraft pulping, both methods require significantly lower capital investments, with minimum required selling prices (estimated to achieve 16% IRR) below current market rates for extensively used bleached kraft pulps in the USA tissue industry. The economic benefits derive from several factors: the low cost of bamboo as raw material, reduced capital needs for new pulping technologies, lower transportation costs from the pulp mill to tissue and towel manufacturing facilities, and the high market price of bleached kraft pulp.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
5.10%
发文量
122
审稿时长
4.5 months
期刊介绍: Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining is a vital source of information on sustainable products, fuels and energy. Examining the spectrum of international scientific research and industrial development along the entire supply chain, The journal publishes a balanced mixture of peer-reviewed critical reviews, commentary, business news highlights, policy updates and patent intelligence. Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining is dedicated to fostering growth in the biorenewables sector and serving its growing interdisciplinary community by providing a unique, systems-based insight into technologies in these fields as well as their industrial development.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Using rhamnolipid as a promoter to improve the production of germacrene A by Yarrowia lipolytica Trends and challenges in hydrogen production for a sustainable energy future Soil health impact of long-term sugarcane vinasse recycling Technoeconomic analysis of alternatives to improve Cuban sugarcane wax-refining technology using Superpro Designer
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1