沉默 siRNA 微针贴片与硅胶片在减少手术后疤痕方面的比较:单盲随机对照临床试验。

IF 11 1区 医学 Q1 DERMATOLOGY British Journal of Dermatology Pub Date : 2024-12-23 DOI:10.1093/bjd/ljae347
Delwyn Zhi Jie Lim, Yong Yao Chun, Faith Nicole Shih Yun Tan, Amelia Yuting Monteiro, Hui Mei Cheng, Jia Yi Lee, Yingrou Tan, Timothy T Y Tan, Hong Liang Tey
{"title":"沉默 siRNA 微针贴片与硅胶片在减少手术后疤痕方面的比较:单盲随机对照临床试验。","authors":"Delwyn Zhi Jie Lim, Yong Yao Chun, Faith Nicole Shih Yun Tan, Amelia Yuting Monteiro, Hui Mei Cheng, Jia Yi Lee, Yingrou Tan, Timothy T Y Tan, Hong Liang Tey","doi":"10.1093/bjd/ljae347","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A common complication of wounds is the excessive production of fibrotic scar tissue, which can lead to hypertrophic scars or keloids. Currently, no treatments with good evidence for preventing excessive scar tissue formation are available. We explored the use of microneedle patches containing small interfering RNA (siRNA) to inhibit SPARC mRNA in reducing the volume of postoperative scars.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare differences in postoperative scar volume with the daily application of siRNA-embedded dissolving microneedle patches vs. silicone sheets.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was an 8-week, single-blinded intraindividually controlled randomized trial at a tertiary dermatological centre. Patients with 2-week-old postoperative wounds were included. Each half of the scar was randomly assigned to the microneedle patch or silicone sheet. Three-dimensional (3D) volumes were obtained from the scars via a high-resolution scanner at days 0, 30 and 60. The trial was registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12622000558729).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At day 30, scars treated with microneedle patches had a lower geometric mean volume of 0.79 mm3 vs. scars treated with silicone sheets, with a difference in mean percentage volume reduction of 10.7%. At day 60, scars treated with microneedle patches had a statistically significant lower volume (8.88 mm3) compared with the side treated with silicone sheets (12.77 mm3; P = 0.005), with a difference in mean percentage reduction of 9.7%. Additionally, there was also a statistically significant difference between the percentage reduction in scar volume vs. baseline on the side treated with microneedle patches (mean 83.8%) compared with the side treated with silicone sheets (mean 74.1%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There was a significantly greater reduction in the volume of postoperative scars on the side of the scar treated with microneedle patches compared with the side treated with silicone sheets. This demonstrates the use of transdermal gene-silencing technology in scar inhibition and that siRNA microneedle patches can be effective and safe in reducing scar tissue formation.</p>","PeriodicalId":9238,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Dermatology","volume":" ","pages":"19-26"},"PeriodicalIF":11.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Small interfering RNA microneedle patches versus silicone sheets in reducing postoperative scars: a randomized single-blinded intraindividually controlled clinical trial.\",\"authors\":\"Delwyn Zhi Jie Lim, Yong Yao Chun, Faith Nicole Shih Yun Tan, Amelia Yuting Monteiro, Hui Mei Cheng, Jia Yi Lee, Yingrou Tan, Timothy T Y Tan, Hong Liang Tey\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/bjd/ljae347\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A common complication of wounds is the excessive production of fibrotic scar tissue, which can lead to hypertrophic scars or keloids. Currently, no treatments with good evidence for preventing excessive scar tissue formation are available. We explored the use of microneedle patches containing small interfering RNA (siRNA) to inhibit SPARC mRNA in reducing the volume of postoperative scars.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare differences in postoperative scar volume with the daily application of siRNA-embedded dissolving microneedle patches vs. silicone sheets.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was an 8-week, single-blinded intraindividually controlled randomized trial at a tertiary dermatological centre. Patients with 2-week-old postoperative wounds were included. Each half of the scar was randomly assigned to the microneedle patch or silicone sheet. Three-dimensional (3D) volumes were obtained from the scars via a high-resolution scanner at days 0, 30 and 60. The trial was registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12622000558729).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At day 30, scars treated with microneedle patches had a lower geometric mean volume of 0.79 mm3 vs. scars treated with silicone sheets, with a difference in mean percentage volume reduction of 10.7%. At day 60, scars treated with microneedle patches had a statistically significant lower volume (8.88 mm3) compared with the side treated with silicone sheets (12.77 mm3; P = 0.005), with a difference in mean percentage reduction of 9.7%. Additionally, there was also a statistically significant difference between the percentage reduction in scar volume vs. baseline on the side treated with microneedle patches (mean 83.8%) compared with the side treated with silicone sheets (mean 74.1%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There was a significantly greater reduction in the volume of postoperative scars on the side of the scar treated with microneedle patches compared with the side treated with silicone sheets. This demonstrates the use of transdermal gene-silencing technology in scar inhibition and that siRNA microneedle patches can be effective and safe in reducing scar tissue formation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9238,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Journal of Dermatology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"19-26\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Journal of Dermatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjd/ljae347\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DERMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjd/ljae347","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:伤口的一个常见并发症是纤维化瘢痕组织的大量生长,这会导致增生性疤痕或瘢痕疙瘩。目前还没有证据表明任何治疗方法可以防止瘢痕组织过度增生。在这项研究中,我们探讨了含有抑制 SPARC mRNA siRNA 的微针贴片在减少手术后疤痕体积方面的应用:我们的目的是比较每天使用含 siRNA 的可溶解微针贴片和硅胶片在手术后疤痕体积上的差异。我们的假设是,使用 siRNA 微针贴片的那一半伤口的疤痕形成会比使用硅胶片的那一半伤口的疤痕形成要少,这反映在较小的三维体积上:这是在一家三级皮肤病中心进行的一项为期 8 周的单盲随机对照试验。试验招募了术后两周的伤口患者。每一半疤痕被随机分配到微针贴片或硅胶片上。在第0天、第30天和第60天,通过高分辨率扫描仪获取疤痕的三维(3D)体积:第30天时,使用微针贴片治疗的疤痕与使用硅胶片治疗的疤痕相比,几何平均体积减少了0.79立方毫米,平均体积减少百分比差异为10.70%。第60天时,使用微针贴片治疗的疤痕与使用硅胶片治疗的疤痕(12.77立方毫米,P=0.005)相比,体积显著减少(8.88立方毫米),平均体积减少百分比差异为9.66%。此外,与基线相比,使用微针贴片治疗的一侧(平均=83.78%)与使用硅胶片治疗的一侧(平均=74.11%)的疤痕体积减少百分比也有显著的统计学差异:结论:使用微针贴片治疗的一侧与使用硅胶片治疗的一侧相比,手术后疤痕的体积明显缩小。这表明透皮基因沉默技术可用于抑制疤痕,而且 siRNA 微针贴片是减少疤痕组织形成的一种有效而安全的方法:澳大利亚-新西兰临床试验登记处(ANZCTR),ACTRN12622000558729,https://www.anzctr.org.au。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Small interfering RNA microneedle patches versus silicone sheets in reducing postoperative scars: a randomized single-blinded intraindividually controlled clinical trial.

Background: A common complication of wounds is the excessive production of fibrotic scar tissue, which can lead to hypertrophic scars or keloids. Currently, no treatments with good evidence for preventing excessive scar tissue formation are available. We explored the use of microneedle patches containing small interfering RNA (siRNA) to inhibit SPARC mRNA in reducing the volume of postoperative scars.

Objectives: To compare differences in postoperative scar volume with the daily application of siRNA-embedded dissolving microneedle patches vs. silicone sheets.

Methods: This was an 8-week, single-blinded intraindividually controlled randomized trial at a tertiary dermatological centre. Patients with 2-week-old postoperative wounds were included. Each half of the scar was randomly assigned to the microneedle patch or silicone sheet. Three-dimensional (3D) volumes were obtained from the scars via a high-resolution scanner at days 0, 30 and 60. The trial was registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12622000558729).

Results: At day 30, scars treated with microneedle patches had a lower geometric mean volume of 0.79 mm3 vs. scars treated with silicone sheets, with a difference in mean percentage volume reduction of 10.7%. At day 60, scars treated with microneedle patches had a statistically significant lower volume (8.88 mm3) compared with the side treated with silicone sheets (12.77 mm3; P = 0.005), with a difference in mean percentage reduction of 9.7%. Additionally, there was also a statistically significant difference between the percentage reduction in scar volume vs. baseline on the side treated with microneedle patches (mean 83.8%) compared with the side treated with silicone sheets (mean 74.1%).

Conclusions: There was a significantly greater reduction in the volume of postoperative scars on the side of the scar treated with microneedle patches compared with the side treated with silicone sheets. This demonstrates the use of transdermal gene-silencing technology in scar inhibition and that siRNA microneedle patches can be effective and safe in reducing scar tissue formation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
British Journal of Dermatology
British Journal of Dermatology 医学-皮肤病学
CiteScore
16.30
自引率
3.90%
发文量
1062
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Dermatology (BJD) is committed to publishing the highest quality dermatological research. Through its publications, the journal seeks to advance the understanding, management, and treatment of skin diseases, ultimately aiming to improve patient outcomes.
期刊最新文献
Prevalence of Chronic Hand Eczema in adults: A cross-sectional survey of over 60,000 respondents in the general population in Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and the United Kingdom. Functional genotype classification groups distinguish disease severity in recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa. Age and biologic survival in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis: A cohort study from the British Association of Dermatologists Biologics and Immunomodulators Register (BADBIR). Development of novel patient-reported outcome instruments to assess atopic dermatitis-associated dyspigmentation and xerosis in patients with skin of colour. Perianal melanosis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1