1996 至 2021 年美国抗高血压药物的使用和成本模式。

IF 6.9 1区 医学 Q1 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Hypertension Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-04 DOI:10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.124.23509
Joshua A Jacobs, Anthony Rodgers, Brandon K Bellows, Inmaculada Hernandez, Nelson Wang, Catherine G Derington, Jordan B King, Alexander R Zheutlin, Paul K Whelton, Brent M Egan, William C Cushman, Adam P Bress
{"title":"1996 至 2021 年美国抗高血压药物的使用和成本模式。","authors":"Joshua A Jacobs, Anthony Rodgers, Brandon K Bellows, Inmaculada Hernandez, Nelson Wang, Catherine G Derington, Jordan B King, Alexander R Zheutlin, Paul K Whelton, Brent M Egan, William C Cushman, Adam P Bress","doi":"10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.124.23509","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Antihypertensive medication use patterns have likely been influenced by changing costs and accessibility over the past 3 decades. This study examines the relationships between patent exclusivity loss, medication costs, and national health policies on antihypertensive medication use.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using 1996 to 2021 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey data of US adults with hypertension taking at least 1 antihypertensive medication, we conducted a cross-sectional analysis. We explored the associations between patent exclusivity loss, per-pill costs, and Medicare Part D enactment on medication use over time, focusing on the most commonly used medications (lisinopril, amlodipine, losartan, hydrochlorothiazide, and metoprolol).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The unweighted sample comprised 50 095 US adults (mean age, 62 years; 53% female). The survey-weighted number of adults taking antihypertensive medications increased from 22 million (95% CIs, 20-23 million) to 55 million (95% CI, 51-60 million) between 1996 and 2021. Loss of patent exclusivity led to increased medication fills, notably for lisinopril, amlodipine, and losartan, which all exhibited within-class dominance. However, per-pill cost decreases coinciding with Medicare Part D did not increase the number of individuals treated or the use of specific antihypertensive medications or classes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The increase in antihypertensive medication use over the past decades highlights the significant impact of loss of patent exclusivity on the uptake in the use of specific medications. These findings underscore the complexity of factors influencing medication use, beyond cost reductions alone, and suggest that policies need to consider multiple facets to effectively improve antihypertensive medication accessibility and utilization.</p>","PeriodicalId":13042,"journal":{"name":"Hypertension","volume":" ","pages":"2307-2317"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11483193/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Use and Cost Patterns of Antihypertensive Medications in the United States From 1996 to 2021.\",\"authors\":\"Joshua A Jacobs, Anthony Rodgers, Brandon K Bellows, Inmaculada Hernandez, Nelson Wang, Catherine G Derington, Jordan B King, Alexander R Zheutlin, Paul K Whelton, Brent M Egan, William C Cushman, Adam P Bress\",\"doi\":\"10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.124.23509\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Antihypertensive medication use patterns have likely been influenced by changing costs and accessibility over the past 3 decades. This study examines the relationships between patent exclusivity loss, medication costs, and national health policies on antihypertensive medication use.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using 1996 to 2021 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey data of US adults with hypertension taking at least 1 antihypertensive medication, we conducted a cross-sectional analysis. We explored the associations between patent exclusivity loss, per-pill costs, and Medicare Part D enactment on medication use over time, focusing on the most commonly used medications (lisinopril, amlodipine, losartan, hydrochlorothiazide, and metoprolol).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The unweighted sample comprised 50 095 US adults (mean age, 62 years; 53% female). The survey-weighted number of adults taking antihypertensive medications increased from 22 million (95% CIs, 20-23 million) to 55 million (95% CI, 51-60 million) between 1996 and 2021. Loss of patent exclusivity led to increased medication fills, notably for lisinopril, amlodipine, and losartan, which all exhibited within-class dominance. However, per-pill cost decreases coinciding with Medicare Part D did not increase the number of individuals treated or the use of specific antihypertensive medications or classes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The increase in antihypertensive medication use over the past decades highlights the significant impact of loss of patent exclusivity on the uptake in the use of specific medications. These findings underscore the complexity of factors influencing medication use, beyond cost reductions alone, and suggest that policies need to consider multiple facets to effectively improve antihypertensive medication accessibility and utilization.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13042,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hypertension\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2307-2317\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11483193/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hypertension\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.124.23509\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hypertension","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.124.23509","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在过去 30 年中,抗高血压药物的使用模式可能受到了成本和可及性变化的影响。本研究探讨了专利独占性丧失、药物成本和国家卫生政策对抗高血压药物使用之间的关系:我们利用 1996 年至 2021 年美国成人高血压患者至少服用一种降压药的医疗支出小组调查数据进行了横截面分析。我们以最常用的药物(利辛普利、氨氯地平、洛沙坦、氢氯噻嗪和美托洛尔)为重点,探讨了随着时间的推移,专利独占性丧失、每粒药成本和医疗保险 D 部分的颁布与药物使用之间的关联:未加权样本包括 50 095 名美国成年人(平均年龄 62 岁;53% 为女性)。在 1996 年至 2021 年期间,服用降压药的成人调查加权人数从 2200 万(95% CI,2000-2300 万)增至 5500 万(95% CI,5100-6000 万)。专利专有权的丧失导致了药物填充量的增加,尤其是利辛普利、氨氯地平和洛沙坦,它们都表现出了同类药物中的优势。然而,与医疗保险 D 部分同时出现的每粒药成本下降并没有增加接受治疗的人数或特定降压药物或类别的使用量:结论:过去几十年中抗高血压药物使用量的增加凸显了专利独占性的丧失对特定药物使用量的重大影响。这些发现强调了影响药物使用的因素的复杂性,而不仅仅是成本的降低,并表明政策需要考虑多个方面,以有效改善抗高血压药物的可及性和使用率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Use and Cost Patterns of Antihypertensive Medications in the United States From 1996 to 2021.

Background: Antihypertensive medication use patterns have likely been influenced by changing costs and accessibility over the past 3 decades. This study examines the relationships between patent exclusivity loss, medication costs, and national health policies on antihypertensive medication use.

Methods: Using 1996 to 2021 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey data of US adults with hypertension taking at least 1 antihypertensive medication, we conducted a cross-sectional analysis. We explored the associations between patent exclusivity loss, per-pill costs, and Medicare Part D enactment on medication use over time, focusing on the most commonly used medications (lisinopril, amlodipine, losartan, hydrochlorothiazide, and metoprolol).

Results: The unweighted sample comprised 50 095 US adults (mean age, 62 years; 53% female). The survey-weighted number of adults taking antihypertensive medications increased from 22 million (95% CIs, 20-23 million) to 55 million (95% CI, 51-60 million) between 1996 and 2021. Loss of patent exclusivity led to increased medication fills, notably for lisinopril, amlodipine, and losartan, which all exhibited within-class dominance. However, per-pill cost decreases coinciding with Medicare Part D did not increase the number of individuals treated or the use of specific antihypertensive medications or classes.

Conclusions: The increase in antihypertensive medication use over the past decades highlights the significant impact of loss of patent exclusivity on the uptake in the use of specific medications. These findings underscore the complexity of factors influencing medication use, beyond cost reductions alone, and suggest that policies need to consider multiple facets to effectively improve antihypertensive medication accessibility and utilization.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Hypertension
Hypertension 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
15.90
自引率
4.80%
发文量
1006
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Hypertension presents top-tier articles on high blood pressure in each monthly release. These articles delve into basic science, clinical treatment, and prevention of hypertension and associated cardiovascular, metabolic, and renal conditions. Renowned for their lasting significance, these papers contribute to advancing our understanding and management of hypertension-related issues.
期刊最新文献
Awakening to the Pertinence of Sleep for Hypertension. Renal Medulla in Hypertension. Personal Genetic-Hypertension Odyssey From Phenotypes to Genotypes and Targets. Water and Electrolyte Content in Hypertension in the Skin (WHYSKI) in Primary Aldosteronism. Aortic-Femoral Stiffness Gradient and Cardiovascular Risk in Older Adults.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1