心房颤动直流电心脏起博过程中的手动胸部加压:随机对照试验(PRESSURE-AF)。

IF 8 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS JACC. Clinical electrophysiology Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jacep.2024.05.037
David Ferreira BMed , Philopatir Mikhail MBBS , Joyce Lim MBBS , Max Ray BMed , Jovita Dwivedi MBBS , Stephen Brienesse BMed , Lloyd Butel-Simoes MBBS , William Meere MBBS , Adam Bland MBBS , Niklas Howden MBBS , Michael Malaty MBBS , Mercy Kunda BNurs , Amy Kelty BNurs , Michael McGee MBBS , Andrew Boyle PhD , Aaron L. Sverdlov PhD , Maged William MBBS , John Attia PhD , Nicholas Jackson MBBS , Gwilym Morris PhD , Bradley Wilsmore PhD
{"title":"心房颤动直流电心脏起博过程中的手动胸部加压:随机对照试验(PRESSURE-AF)。","authors":"David Ferreira BMed ,&nbsp;Philopatir Mikhail MBBS ,&nbsp;Joyce Lim MBBS ,&nbsp;Max Ray BMed ,&nbsp;Jovita Dwivedi MBBS ,&nbsp;Stephen Brienesse BMed ,&nbsp;Lloyd Butel-Simoes MBBS ,&nbsp;William Meere MBBS ,&nbsp;Adam Bland MBBS ,&nbsp;Niklas Howden MBBS ,&nbsp;Michael Malaty MBBS ,&nbsp;Mercy Kunda BNurs ,&nbsp;Amy Kelty BNurs ,&nbsp;Michael McGee MBBS ,&nbsp;Andrew Boyle PhD ,&nbsp;Aaron L. Sverdlov PhD ,&nbsp;Maged William MBBS ,&nbsp;John Attia PhD ,&nbsp;Nicholas Jackson MBBS ,&nbsp;Gwilym Morris PhD ,&nbsp;Bradley Wilsmore PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jacep.2024.05.037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Direct current cardioversion is frequently used to return patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) to sinus rhythm. Chest pressure during cardioversion may improve the efficacy of cardioversion through decreasing transthoracic impedance and increasing cardiac energy delivery.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of upfront chest pressure during direct current cardioversion for AF with anterior-posterior pad positioning.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This was a multicenter, investigator-initiated, double-blinded, randomized clinical trial. Recruitment occurred from 2021 to 2023. Follow-up was until hospital discharge. Recruitment occurred across 3 centers in New South Wales, Australia. Inclusion criteria were age ≥18 years, referred for cardioversion for AF, and anticoagulation for 3 weeks or transesophageal echocardiography excluding left atrial appendage thrombus. Exclusion criteria were other arrhythmias requiring cardioversion, such as atrial flutter and atrial tachycardia. The intervention arm received chest pressure during cardioversion from the first shock. The primary efficacy outcome was total joules required per patient encounter. Secondary efficacy outcomes included first shock success, transthoracic impedance, cardioversion success, and sinus rhythm at 30 minutes post cardioversion.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 311 patients were randomized, 153 to control and 158 to intervention. There was no difference in total joules applied per encounter in the control arm vs intervention arm (355.0 ± 301 J vs 413.8 ± 347 J; <em>P</em> = 0.19). There was no difference in first shock success, total shocks provided, average impedance, and cardioversion success.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This study does not support the routine application of chest pressure for direct current cardioversion in atrial fibrillation (PRESSURE-AF [Investigating the Efficacy of Chest Pressure for Direct Current Cardioversion in Atrial Fibrillation: A Randomized Controlled Trial]; <span><span>ACTRN12620001028998</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>)</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14573,"journal":{"name":"JACC. Clinical electrophysiology","volume":"10 10","pages":"Pages 2207-2213"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Manual Chest PRESSURE During Direct Current Cardioversion for Atrial Fibrillation\",\"authors\":\"David Ferreira BMed ,&nbsp;Philopatir Mikhail MBBS ,&nbsp;Joyce Lim MBBS ,&nbsp;Max Ray BMed ,&nbsp;Jovita Dwivedi MBBS ,&nbsp;Stephen Brienesse BMed ,&nbsp;Lloyd Butel-Simoes MBBS ,&nbsp;William Meere MBBS ,&nbsp;Adam Bland MBBS ,&nbsp;Niklas Howden MBBS ,&nbsp;Michael Malaty MBBS ,&nbsp;Mercy Kunda BNurs ,&nbsp;Amy Kelty BNurs ,&nbsp;Michael McGee MBBS ,&nbsp;Andrew Boyle PhD ,&nbsp;Aaron L. Sverdlov PhD ,&nbsp;Maged William MBBS ,&nbsp;John Attia PhD ,&nbsp;Nicholas Jackson MBBS ,&nbsp;Gwilym Morris PhD ,&nbsp;Bradley Wilsmore PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jacep.2024.05.037\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Direct current cardioversion is frequently used to return patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) to sinus rhythm. Chest pressure during cardioversion may improve the efficacy of cardioversion through decreasing transthoracic impedance and increasing cardiac energy delivery.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of upfront chest pressure during direct current cardioversion for AF with anterior-posterior pad positioning.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This was a multicenter, investigator-initiated, double-blinded, randomized clinical trial. Recruitment occurred from 2021 to 2023. Follow-up was until hospital discharge. Recruitment occurred across 3 centers in New South Wales, Australia. Inclusion criteria were age ≥18 years, referred for cardioversion for AF, and anticoagulation for 3 weeks or transesophageal echocardiography excluding left atrial appendage thrombus. Exclusion criteria were other arrhythmias requiring cardioversion, such as atrial flutter and atrial tachycardia. The intervention arm received chest pressure during cardioversion from the first shock. The primary efficacy outcome was total joules required per patient encounter. Secondary efficacy outcomes included first shock success, transthoracic impedance, cardioversion success, and sinus rhythm at 30 minutes post cardioversion.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 311 patients were randomized, 153 to control and 158 to intervention. There was no difference in total joules applied per encounter in the control arm vs intervention arm (355.0 ± 301 J vs 413.8 ± 347 J; <em>P</em> = 0.19). There was no difference in first shock success, total shocks provided, average impedance, and cardioversion success.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This study does not support the routine application of chest pressure for direct current cardioversion in atrial fibrillation (PRESSURE-AF [Investigating the Efficacy of Chest Pressure for Direct Current Cardioversion in Atrial Fibrillation: A Randomized Controlled Trial]; <span><span>ACTRN12620001028998</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>)</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14573,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JACC. Clinical electrophysiology\",\"volume\":\"10 10\",\"pages\":\"Pages 2207-2213\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JACC. Clinical electrophysiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405500X24004870\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JACC. Clinical electrophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405500X24004870","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:直流电心律转复常用于使心房颤动(房颤)患者恢复窦性心律。心脏转复期间的胸外按压可通过降低经胸阻抗和增加心脏能量输送来提高心脏转复的疗效:本研究旨在评估直流电心房颤动直流电心脏电复律期间采用前后垫定位进行前胸加压的有效性和安全性:这是一项由研究者发起的多中心、双盲、随机临床试验。招募时间为 2021 年至 2023 年。随访至出院。招募在澳大利亚新南威尔士州的 3 个中心进行。纳入标准为年龄≥18岁、因房颤转诊心脏复律、抗凝治疗3周或经食道超声心动图检查排除左心房阑尾血栓。排除标准是其他需要心脏复律的心律失常,如心房扑动和房性心动过速。干预组从第一次电击开始在心脏复苏过程中接受胸外按压。主要疗效指标是每位患者所需的总焦耳数。次要疗效结果包括首次电击成功率、经胸阻抗、心脏复律成功率和心脏复律后 30 分钟的窦性心律:共有 311 名患者接受了随机治疗,其中 153 人接受对照治疗,158 人接受干预治疗。对照组与干预组每次使用的总焦耳数没有差异(355.0 ± 301 焦耳 vs 413.8 ± 347 焦耳;P = 0.19)。首次电击成功率、总电击次数、平均阻抗和心脏转复成功率均无差异:本研究不支持在心房颤动的直流电心律转复中常规应用胸外按压(PRESSURE-AF [心房颤动直流电心律转复中胸外按压的有效性研究:一项随机对照试验]):随机对照试验];ACTRN12620001028998)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Manual Chest PRESSURE During Direct Current Cardioversion for Atrial Fibrillation

Background

Direct current cardioversion is frequently used to return patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) to sinus rhythm. Chest pressure during cardioversion may improve the efficacy of cardioversion through decreasing transthoracic impedance and increasing cardiac energy delivery.

Objectives

This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of upfront chest pressure during direct current cardioversion for AF with anterior-posterior pad positioning.

Methods

This was a multicenter, investigator-initiated, double-blinded, randomized clinical trial. Recruitment occurred from 2021 to 2023. Follow-up was until hospital discharge. Recruitment occurred across 3 centers in New South Wales, Australia. Inclusion criteria were age ≥18 years, referred for cardioversion for AF, and anticoagulation for 3 weeks or transesophageal echocardiography excluding left atrial appendage thrombus. Exclusion criteria were other arrhythmias requiring cardioversion, such as atrial flutter and atrial tachycardia. The intervention arm received chest pressure during cardioversion from the first shock. The primary efficacy outcome was total joules required per patient encounter. Secondary efficacy outcomes included first shock success, transthoracic impedance, cardioversion success, and sinus rhythm at 30 minutes post cardioversion.

Results

A total of 311 patients were randomized, 153 to control and 158 to intervention. There was no difference in total joules applied per encounter in the control arm vs intervention arm (355.0 ± 301 J vs 413.8 ± 347 J; P = 0.19). There was no difference in first shock success, total shocks provided, average impedance, and cardioversion success.

Conclusions

This study does not support the routine application of chest pressure for direct current cardioversion in atrial fibrillation (PRESSURE-AF [Investigating the Efficacy of Chest Pressure for Direct Current Cardioversion in Atrial Fibrillation: A Randomized Controlled Trial]; ACTRN12620001028998)
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JACC. Clinical electrophysiology
JACC. Clinical electrophysiology CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
5.70%
发文量
250
期刊介绍: JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology is one of a family of specialist journals launched by the renowned Journal of the American College of Cardiology (JACC). It encompasses all aspects of the epidemiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment of cardiac arrhythmias. Submissions of original research and state-of-the-art reviews from cardiology, cardiovascular surgery, neurology, outcomes research, and related fields are encouraged. Experimental and preclinical work that directly relates to diagnostic or therapeutic interventions are also encouraged. In general, case reports will not be considered for publication.
期刊最新文献
Lead Integrity and Failure Evaluation in Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing (LIFE-LBBAP) Study. Safety and Feasibility of Pulsed Field Ablation in Patients With Mechanical Prosthetic Valves. Epilepsy and Cardiac Arrhythmias: A State-of-the-Art Review. Home Sotalol Initiation for the Management of Atrial and Ventricular Arrhythmias Using Remote Electrocardiographic Monitoring. A Novel Computational Platform for Optimizing Synergistic Drug Combinations for Cardioversion of Atrial Fibrillation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1