[椎体成形术治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折引起的慢性背痛]。

Q4 Medicine Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde Pub Date : 2024-08-21
Issam Boukrab, Alexander Venmans, Hans G J Kortman, Esther Donga, Paul R A M Depauw, Paul N M Lohle
{"title":"[椎体成形术治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折引起的慢性背痛]。","authors":"Issam Boukrab, Alexander Venmans, Hans G J Kortman, Esther Donga, Paul R A M Depauw, Paul N M Lohle","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Evidence regarding percutaneous vertebroplasty (PV) for chronic painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs) remains limited. To compare pain relief, quality of life, and disability between PV and active control (anesthetic infiltration) interventions for chronic OVCF.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Randomized controlled trial.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective randomized clinical trial was conducted between May 2013 and June 2019 in participants with pain due to OVCF lasting longer than 3 months with bone marrow edema present at MRI. Study participants were randomly assigned to undergo PV (n = 40) or active control intervention (n = 40). The primary outcome was pain severity, assessed with the visual analog scale (VAS) (range, 0-10) during 12 months after treatment. Secondary outcomes included Quality of Life Questionnaire of the European Foundation for Osteoporosis (QUALEFFO) score (range, 0-100) and Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) score (range, 0-100). Outcomes were analyzed according to a longitudinal multilevel model used to test the difference between groups in change from baseline across follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age of the 80 participants (54 women) was 69 years ± 10 (SD) in the PV group and 71 years ± 10 in the active control group. VAS score was 7.6 (95% CI: 7.0, 8.2) in the PV group and 7.3 (95% CI: 6.9, 7.8) in the active control group at baseline (P = .47) and 3.9 (95% CI: 3.1, 4.8) and 5.1 (95% CI: 4.3, 6.0), respectively, at month 12 (P = .045). At month 12, the group difference from baseline was 1.3 (95% CI: 0.1, 2.6; P = .02) for VAS, 5.2 (95% CI: 0.9, 9.4; P = .02) for QUALEFFO, and 7.1 (95% CI: -3.3, 17.5; P = .18) for RMDQ, favoring the PV group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In the treatment of pain caused by chronic OVCFs, PV is more effective for pain relief and quality of life improvement than anesthetic injection alone, with similar improvement for disability between the groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":18903,"journal":{"name":"Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde","volume":"168 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Vertebroplasty for chronic back pain due to osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures].\",\"authors\":\"Issam Boukrab, Alexander Venmans, Hans G J Kortman, Esther Donga, Paul R A M Depauw, Paul N M Lohle\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Evidence regarding percutaneous vertebroplasty (PV) for chronic painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs) remains limited. To compare pain relief, quality of life, and disability between PV and active control (anesthetic infiltration) interventions for chronic OVCF.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Randomized controlled trial.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective randomized clinical trial was conducted between May 2013 and June 2019 in participants with pain due to OVCF lasting longer than 3 months with bone marrow edema present at MRI. Study participants were randomly assigned to undergo PV (n = 40) or active control intervention (n = 40). The primary outcome was pain severity, assessed with the visual analog scale (VAS) (range, 0-10) during 12 months after treatment. Secondary outcomes included Quality of Life Questionnaire of the European Foundation for Osteoporosis (QUALEFFO) score (range, 0-100) and Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) score (range, 0-100). Outcomes were analyzed according to a longitudinal multilevel model used to test the difference between groups in change from baseline across follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age of the 80 participants (54 women) was 69 years ± 10 (SD) in the PV group and 71 years ± 10 in the active control group. VAS score was 7.6 (95% CI: 7.0, 8.2) in the PV group and 7.3 (95% CI: 6.9, 7.8) in the active control group at baseline (P = .47) and 3.9 (95% CI: 3.1, 4.8) and 5.1 (95% CI: 4.3, 6.0), respectively, at month 12 (P = .045). At month 12, the group difference from baseline was 1.3 (95% CI: 0.1, 2.6; P = .02) for VAS, 5.2 (95% CI: 0.9, 9.4; P = .02) for QUALEFFO, and 7.1 (95% CI: -3.3, 17.5; P = .18) for RMDQ, favoring the PV group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In the treatment of pain caused by chronic OVCFs, PV is more effective for pain relief and quality of life improvement than anesthetic injection alone, with similar improvement for disability between the groups.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18903,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde\",\"volume\":\"168 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:有关经皮椎体成形术(PV)治疗慢性疼痛性骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折(OVCF)的证据仍然有限。目的:比较经皮椎体成形术和主动控制(麻醉浸润)干预治疗慢性骨质疏松性脊椎压缩骨折的疼痛缓解、生活质量和残疾情况:设计:随机对照试验:这项前瞻性随机临床试验于 2013 年 5 月至 2019 年 6 月间进行,研究对象为因 OVCF 引起疼痛且持续时间超过 3 个月,并在核磁共振成像中出现骨髓水肿的患者。研究参与者被随机分配接受PV(40人)或积极对照干预(40人)。主要结果是治疗后12个月内的疼痛严重程度,采用视觉模拟量表(VAS)进行评估(范围为0-10)。次要结果包括欧洲骨质疏松症基金会生活质量问卷(QUALEFFO)评分(范围 0-100)和罗兰-莫里斯残疾问卷(RMDQ)评分(范围 0-100)。研究结果根据纵向多层次模型进行分析,该模型用于检验各组在随访期间与基线相比的变化差异:80名参与者(54名女性)的平均年龄为69岁(标准差)±10岁(PV组)和71岁(标准差)±10岁(积极对照组)。在基线(P = .47)和第 12 个月时(P = .045),基线组的 VAS 评分分别为 7.6(95% CI:7.0, 8.2)和 7.3(95% CI:6.9, 7.8),主动对照组的 VAS 评分分别为 3.9(95% CI:3.1, 4.8)和 5.1(95% CI:4.3, 6.0)。第 12 个月时,与基线相比,VAS 的组间差异为 1.3 (95% CI: 0.1, 2.6; P = .02),QUALEFFO 的组间差异为 5.2 (95% CI: 0.9, 9.4; P = .02),RMDQ 的组间差异为 7.1 (95% CI: -3.3, 17.5; P = .18),PV 组更胜一筹:结论:在治疗慢性 OVCF 引起的疼痛时,PV 在缓解疼痛和改善生活质量方面比单纯注射麻醉剂更有效,两组在改善残疾方面的效果相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[Vertebroplasty for chronic back pain due to osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures].

Objective: Evidence regarding percutaneous vertebroplasty (PV) for chronic painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs) remains limited. To compare pain relief, quality of life, and disability between PV and active control (anesthetic infiltration) interventions for chronic OVCF.

Design: Randomized controlled trial.

Methods: This prospective randomized clinical trial was conducted between May 2013 and June 2019 in participants with pain due to OVCF lasting longer than 3 months with bone marrow edema present at MRI. Study participants were randomly assigned to undergo PV (n = 40) or active control intervention (n = 40). The primary outcome was pain severity, assessed with the visual analog scale (VAS) (range, 0-10) during 12 months after treatment. Secondary outcomes included Quality of Life Questionnaire of the European Foundation for Osteoporosis (QUALEFFO) score (range, 0-100) and Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) score (range, 0-100). Outcomes were analyzed according to a longitudinal multilevel model used to test the difference between groups in change from baseline across follow-up.

Results: The mean age of the 80 participants (54 women) was 69 years ± 10 (SD) in the PV group and 71 years ± 10 in the active control group. VAS score was 7.6 (95% CI: 7.0, 8.2) in the PV group and 7.3 (95% CI: 6.9, 7.8) in the active control group at baseline (P = .47) and 3.9 (95% CI: 3.1, 4.8) and 5.1 (95% CI: 4.3, 6.0), respectively, at month 12 (P = .045). At month 12, the group difference from baseline was 1.3 (95% CI: 0.1, 2.6; P = .02) for VAS, 5.2 (95% CI: 0.9, 9.4; P = .02) for QUALEFFO, and 7.1 (95% CI: -3.3, 17.5; P = .18) for RMDQ, favoring the PV group.

Conclusion: In the treatment of pain caused by chronic OVCFs, PV is more effective for pain relief and quality of life improvement than anesthetic injection alone, with similar improvement for disability between the groups.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde
Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
302
期刊介绍: Het NTVG staat bekend als hét wetenschappelijke algemene medische tijdschrift. De lange historie en de degelijkheid maken het tijdschrift tot een bolwerk van medische wetenschap in druk. Ook door de goede leesbaarheid draagt het tijdschrift bij aan de voortdurende dialoog over de geneeskunde.
期刊最新文献
[Dealing with deep uncertainty during a pandemic; make policies adaptive]. [Neurological side-effects associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors]. [Residency attrition in orthopaedic surgery; an explanatory model based on qualitative research]. ['More research is needed' is a meaningless conclusion]. [Shaking hands or not after the COVID pandemic?]
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1