聚类分析在新诊断 2 型糖尿病患者中的临床应用。

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q3 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Hormones-International Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism Pub Date : 2024-09-04 DOI:10.1007/s42000-024-00593-4
Yazhi Wang, Hui Chen
{"title":"聚类分析在新诊断 2 型糖尿病患者中的临床应用。","authors":"Yazhi Wang, Hui Chen","doi":"10.1007/s42000-024-00593-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Early prevention and treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is still a huge challenge for patients and clinicians. Recently, a novel cluster-based diabetes classification was proposed which may offer the possibility to solve this problem. In this study, we report our performance of cluster analysis of individuals newly diagnosed with T2DM, our exploration of each subtype's clinical characteristics and medication treatment, and the comparison carried out concerning the risk for diabetes complications and comorbidities among subtypes by adjusting for influencing factors. We hope to promote the further application of cluster analysis in individuals with early-stage T2DM.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this study, a k-means cluster algorithm was applied based on five indicators, namely, age, body mass index (BMI), glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c), homeostasis model assessment-2 insulin resistance (HOMA2-IR), and homeostasis model assessment-2 β-cell function (HOMA2-β), in order to perform the cluster analysis among 567 newly diagnosed participants with T2DM. The clinical characteristics and medication of each subtype were analyzed. The risk for diabetes complications and comorbidities in each subtype was compared by logistic regression analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 567 patients were clustered into four subtypes, as follows: severe insulin-deficient diabetes (SIDD, 24.46%), age-related diabetes (MARD, 30.86%), mild obesity-related diabetes (MOD, 25.57%), and severe insulin-resistant diabetes (SIRD, 20.11%). According to the results of the oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) and biochemical indices, fasting blood glucose (FBG), 2-hour postprandial blood glucose (2hBG), HbA1c, total cholesterol (TC), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and triglyceride-glucose index (TyG) were higher in SIDD and SIRD than in MARD and MOD. MOD had the highest fasting C-peptide (FCP), 2-hour postprandial C-peptide (2hCP), fasting insulin (FINS), 2-hour postprandial insulin (2hINS), serum creatinine (SCr), and uric acid (UA), while SIRD had the highest triglycerides (TGs) and TyG-BMI. Albumin transaminase (ALT) and albumin transaminase (AST) were higher in MOD and SIRD. As concerms medications, compared to the other subtypes, SIDD had a lower rate of metformin use (39.1%) and a higher rate of α-glucosidase inhibitor (AGI, 61.7%) and insulin (74.4%) use. SIRD showed the highest frequency of use of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT-2i, 36.0%) and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA, 19.3%). Concerning diabetic complications and comorbidities, the prevalence of diabetic kidney disease (DKD), cardiovascular disease (CVD), non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), dyslipidemia, and hypertension differed significantly among subtypes. Employing logistic regression analysis, after adjusting for unmodifiable (sex and age) and modifiable related influences (e.g., BMI, HbA1c, and smoking), it was found that SIRD had the highest risk of developing DKD (odds ratio, OR = 2.001, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.125-3.559) and dyslipidemia (OR = 3.550, 95% CI: 1.534-8.215). MOD was more likely to suffer from NAFLD (OR = 3.301, 95%CI: 1.586-6.870).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients with newly diagnosed T2DM can be successfully clustered into four subtypes with different clinical characteristics, medication treatment, and risks for diabetes-related complications and comorbidities, the cluster-based diabetes classification possibly being beneficial both for prevention of secondary diabetes and for establishment of a theoretical basis for precision medicine.</p>","PeriodicalId":50399,"journal":{"name":"Hormones-International Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical application of cluster analysis in patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes.\",\"authors\":\"Yazhi Wang, Hui Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s42000-024-00593-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Early prevention and treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is still a huge challenge for patients and clinicians. Recently, a novel cluster-based diabetes classification was proposed which may offer the possibility to solve this problem. In this study, we report our performance of cluster analysis of individuals newly diagnosed with T2DM, our exploration of each subtype's clinical characteristics and medication treatment, and the comparison carried out concerning the risk for diabetes complications and comorbidities among subtypes by adjusting for influencing factors. We hope to promote the further application of cluster analysis in individuals with early-stage T2DM.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this study, a k-means cluster algorithm was applied based on five indicators, namely, age, body mass index (BMI), glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c), homeostasis model assessment-2 insulin resistance (HOMA2-IR), and homeostasis model assessment-2 β-cell function (HOMA2-β), in order to perform the cluster analysis among 567 newly diagnosed participants with T2DM. The clinical characteristics and medication of each subtype were analyzed. The risk for diabetes complications and comorbidities in each subtype was compared by logistic regression analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 567 patients were clustered into four subtypes, as follows: severe insulin-deficient diabetes (SIDD, 24.46%), age-related diabetes (MARD, 30.86%), mild obesity-related diabetes (MOD, 25.57%), and severe insulin-resistant diabetes (SIRD, 20.11%). According to the results of the oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) and biochemical indices, fasting blood glucose (FBG), 2-hour postprandial blood glucose (2hBG), HbA1c, total cholesterol (TC), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and triglyceride-glucose index (TyG) were higher in SIDD and SIRD than in MARD and MOD. MOD had the highest fasting C-peptide (FCP), 2-hour postprandial C-peptide (2hCP), fasting insulin (FINS), 2-hour postprandial insulin (2hINS), serum creatinine (SCr), and uric acid (UA), while SIRD had the highest triglycerides (TGs) and TyG-BMI. Albumin transaminase (ALT) and albumin transaminase (AST) were higher in MOD and SIRD. As concerms medications, compared to the other subtypes, SIDD had a lower rate of metformin use (39.1%) and a higher rate of α-glucosidase inhibitor (AGI, 61.7%) and insulin (74.4%) use. SIRD showed the highest frequency of use of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT-2i, 36.0%) and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA, 19.3%). Concerning diabetic complications and comorbidities, the prevalence of diabetic kidney disease (DKD), cardiovascular disease (CVD), non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), dyslipidemia, and hypertension differed significantly among subtypes. Employing logistic regression analysis, after adjusting for unmodifiable (sex and age) and modifiable related influences (e.g., BMI, HbA1c, and smoking), it was found that SIRD had the highest risk of developing DKD (odds ratio, OR = 2.001, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.125-3.559) and dyslipidemia (OR = 3.550, 95% CI: 1.534-8.215). MOD was more likely to suffer from NAFLD (OR = 3.301, 95%CI: 1.586-6.870).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients with newly diagnosed T2DM can be successfully clustered into four subtypes with different clinical characteristics, medication treatment, and risks for diabetes-related complications and comorbidities, the cluster-based diabetes classification possibly being beneficial both for prevention of secondary diabetes and for establishment of a theoretical basis for precision medicine.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50399,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hormones-International Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hormones-International Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s42000-024-00593-4\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hormones-International Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s42000-024-00593-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:对于患者和临床医生来说,早期预防和治疗 2 型糖尿病(T2DM)仍然是一个巨大的挑战。最近,一种新的基于聚类的糖尿病分类方法被提出,它为解决这一问题提供了可能。在本研究中,我们报告了对新诊断出的 T2DM 患者进行聚类分析的结果,探讨了各亚型的临床特征和药物治疗,并通过调整影响因素,比较了各亚型之间糖尿病并发症和合并症的风险。我们希望能促进聚类分析在早期 T2DM 患者中的进一步应用:本研究基于年龄、体重指数(BMI)、糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)、稳态模型评估-2胰岛素抵抗(HOMA2-IR)和稳态模型评估-2β细胞功能(HOMA2-β)五项指标,采用k均值聚类算法对567名新诊断的T2DM患者进行聚类分析。分析了每个亚型的临床特征和用药情况。通过逻辑回归分析比较了各亚型的糖尿病并发症和合并症风险:结果:567 名患者被分为以下四个亚型:重度胰岛素缺乏性糖尿病(SIDD,24.46%)、年龄相关性糖尿病(MARD,30.86%)、轻度肥胖相关性糖尿病(MOD,25.57%)和重度胰岛素抵抗性糖尿病(SIRD,20.11%)。根据口服葡萄糖耐量试验(OGTT)结果和生化指标,SIDD 和 SIRD 的空腹血糖(FBG)、餐后 2 小时血糖(2hBG)、HbA1c、总胆固醇(TC)、低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)和甘油三酯-葡萄糖指数(TyG)均高于 MARD 和 MOD。MOD 的空腹 C 肽(FCP)、餐后 2 小时 C 肽(2hCP)、空腹胰岛素(FINS)、餐后 2 小时胰岛素(2hINS)、血清肌酐(SCr)和尿酸(UA)最高,而 SIRD 的甘油三酯(TGs)和 TyG-BMI 最高。MOD 和 SIRD 的白蛋白转氨酶(ALT)和白蛋白转氨酶(AST)较高。在药物方面,与其他亚型相比,SIDD 使用二甲双胍的比例较低(39.1%),而使用α-葡萄糖苷酶抑制剂(AGI,61.7%)和胰岛素(74.4%)的比例较高。SIRD 使用钠-葡萄糖共转运体-2 抑制剂(SGLT-2i,36.0%)和胰高血糖素样肽-1 受体激动剂(GLP-1RA,19.3%)的频率最高。在糖尿病并发症和合并症方面,糖尿病肾病(DKD)、心血管疾病(CVD)、非酒精性脂肪肝(NAFLD)、血脂异常和高血压的患病率在不同亚型之间存在显著差异。采用逻辑回归分析,在调整了不可改变(性别和年龄)和可改变的相关影响因素(如体重指数、血红蛋白A1c和吸烟)后,发现SIRD患DKD(几率比,OR = 2.001,95%置信区间(CI):1.125-3.559)和血脂异常(OR = 3.550,95%置信区间(CI):1.534-8.215)的风险最高。MOD更有可能患有非酒精性脂肪肝(OR = 3.301,95%CI:1.586-6.870):结论:新诊断的T2DM患者可被成功聚类为四个亚型,这些亚型具有不同的临床特征、药物治疗、糖尿病相关并发症和合并症风险,基于聚类的糖尿病分类可能对预防继发性糖尿病和建立精准医疗的理论基础有益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Clinical application of cluster analysis in patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes.

Aims: Early prevention and treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is still a huge challenge for patients and clinicians. Recently, a novel cluster-based diabetes classification was proposed which may offer the possibility to solve this problem. In this study, we report our performance of cluster analysis of individuals newly diagnosed with T2DM, our exploration of each subtype's clinical characteristics and medication treatment, and the comparison carried out concerning the risk for diabetes complications and comorbidities among subtypes by adjusting for influencing factors. We hope to promote the further application of cluster analysis in individuals with early-stage T2DM.

Methods: In this study, a k-means cluster algorithm was applied based on five indicators, namely, age, body mass index (BMI), glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c), homeostasis model assessment-2 insulin resistance (HOMA2-IR), and homeostasis model assessment-2 β-cell function (HOMA2-β), in order to perform the cluster analysis among 567 newly diagnosed participants with T2DM. The clinical characteristics and medication of each subtype were analyzed. The risk for diabetes complications and comorbidities in each subtype was compared by logistic regression analysis.

Results: The 567 patients were clustered into four subtypes, as follows: severe insulin-deficient diabetes (SIDD, 24.46%), age-related diabetes (MARD, 30.86%), mild obesity-related diabetes (MOD, 25.57%), and severe insulin-resistant diabetes (SIRD, 20.11%). According to the results of the oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) and biochemical indices, fasting blood glucose (FBG), 2-hour postprandial blood glucose (2hBG), HbA1c, total cholesterol (TC), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and triglyceride-glucose index (TyG) were higher in SIDD and SIRD than in MARD and MOD. MOD had the highest fasting C-peptide (FCP), 2-hour postprandial C-peptide (2hCP), fasting insulin (FINS), 2-hour postprandial insulin (2hINS), serum creatinine (SCr), and uric acid (UA), while SIRD had the highest triglycerides (TGs) and TyG-BMI. Albumin transaminase (ALT) and albumin transaminase (AST) were higher in MOD and SIRD. As concerms medications, compared to the other subtypes, SIDD had a lower rate of metformin use (39.1%) and a higher rate of α-glucosidase inhibitor (AGI, 61.7%) and insulin (74.4%) use. SIRD showed the highest frequency of use of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT-2i, 36.0%) and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA, 19.3%). Concerning diabetic complications and comorbidities, the prevalence of diabetic kidney disease (DKD), cardiovascular disease (CVD), non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), dyslipidemia, and hypertension differed significantly among subtypes. Employing logistic regression analysis, after adjusting for unmodifiable (sex and age) and modifiable related influences (e.g., BMI, HbA1c, and smoking), it was found that SIRD had the highest risk of developing DKD (odds ratio, OR = 2.001, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.125-3.559) and dyslipidemia (OR = 3.550, 95% CI: 1.534-8.215). MOD was more likely to suffer from NAFLD (OR = 3.301, 95%CI: 1.586-6.870).

Conclusions: Patients with newly diagnosed T2DM can be successfully clustered into four subtypes with different clinical characteristics, medication treatment, and risks for diabetes-related complications and comorbidities, the cluster-based diabetes classification possibly being beneficial both for prevention of secondary diabetes and for establishment of a theoretical basis for precision medicine.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
76
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Hormones-International Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism is an international journal published quarterly with an international editorial board aiming at providing a forum covering all fields of endocrinology and metabolic disorders such as disruption of glucose homeostasis (diabetes mellitus), impaired homeostasis of plasma lipids (dyslipidemia), the disorder of bone metabolism (osteoporosis), disturbances of endocrine function and reproductive capacity of women and men. Hormones-International Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism particularly encourages clinical, translational and basic science submissions in the areas of endocrine cancers, nutrition, obesity and metabolic disorders, quality of life of endocrine diseases, epidemiology of endocrine and metabolic disorders.
期刊最新文献
Molecular genetics of adrenal Cushing's syndrome, a Menelaos Batrinos Scholar's review, and the principle of gutta cavat lapidem in research. Challenges and pitfalls in the management of endocrine toxicities from immune checkpoint inhibitors: a case presentation of synchronous thyrotoxicosis and primary adrenal insufficiency in a melanoma patient. Reversibility of disturbed pituitary function in pediatric conditions with psychological stressors: implications for clinical practice. Animal studies on glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and related polyagonists in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. The causal impact of gut microbiota on circulating adipokine concentrations: a two-sample Mendelian randomization study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1