中度至重度银屑病患者使用生物制剂进行剂量升级治疗的频率和结果:一项瑞典登记研究。

Axel Svedbom, Christina Wennerström, Fredrik Hjelm, Anna Tjärnlund, Mona Ståhle
{"title":"中度至重度银屑病患者使用生物制剂进行剂量升级治疗的频率和结果:一项瑞典登记研究。","authors":"Axel Svedbom, Christina Wennerström, Fredrik Hjelm, Anna Tjärnlund, Mona Ståhle","doi":"10.1080/09546634.2024.2398170","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The advent of biosimilars may increase the frequency of dose escalation with biologics in psoriasis.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore the frequency and outcomes of dose escalation with adalimumab etanercept, and ustekinumab.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were extracted from DermaReg-Pso, a psoriasis register in Stockholm, Sweden. The main exposure was treatment, and the main outcome was dose escalation. We describe outcomes with dose escalation by estimating drug survival and changes in the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>554 patients had 946 treatment episodes with adalimumab, etanercept, or ustekinumab. The cumulative incidence of dose escalation was 4.1 per 100 treatment years. The Hazard Ratios (HRs) for dose escalation with ustekinumab vs adalimumab and ustekinumab vs etanercept were 1.93 (95% CI: 1.25-2.98), and 2.20 (95% CI: 1.42-3.41), respectively. After dose escalation, the HRs for treatment discontinuation with adalimumab and etanercept compared with ustekinumab were 3.10 (95% CI: 1.56-6.18) and 7.15 (95% CI: 3.96-12.94), respectively. PASI was higher after compared to before dose escalation for etanercept (<i>p</i> = 0.036), but not for adalimumab (<i>p</i> = 0.832) or ustekinumab (<i>p</i> = 0.300).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Dose escalation was comparatively more frequent with ustekinumab than with adalimumab or etanercept; however, treatment discontinuation after dose escalation was more common with adalimumab and etanercept than ustekinumab.</p>","PeriodicalId":94235,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of dermatological treatment","volume":"35 1","pages":"2398170"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Frequency and outcomes of treatment dose escalation with biologics in moderate-to-severe psoriasis: a Swedish register study.\",\"authors\":\"Axel Svedbom, Christina Wennerström, Fredrik Hjelm, Anna Tjärnlund, Mona Ståhle\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09546634.2024.2398170\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The advent of biosimilars may increase the frequency of dose escalation with biologics in psoriasis.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore the frequency and outcomes of dose escalation with adalimumab etanercept, and ustekinumab.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were extracted from DermaReg-Pso, a psoriasis register in Stockholm, Sweden. The main exposure was treatment, and the main outcome was dose escalation. We describe outcomes with dose escalation by estimating drug survival and changes in the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>554 patients had 946 treatment episodes with adalimumab, etanercept, or ustekinumab. The cumulative incidence of dose escalation was 4.1 per 100 treatment years. The Hazard Ratios (HRs) for dose escalation with ustekinumab vs adalimumab and ustekinumab vs etanercept were 1.93 (95% CI: 1.25-2.98), and 2.20 (95% CI: 1.42-3.41), respectively. After dose escalation, the HRs for treatment discontinuation with adalimumab and etanercept compared with ustekinumab were 3.10 (95% CI: 1.56-6.18) and 7.15 (95% CI: 3.96-12.94), respectively. PASI was higher after compared to before dose escalation for etanercept (<i>p</i> = 0.036), but not for adalimumab (<i>p</i> = 0.832) or ustekinumab (<i>p</i> = 0.300).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Dose escalation was comparatively more frequent with ustekinumab than with adalimumab or etanercept; however, treatment discontinuation after dose escalation was more common with adalimumab and etanercept than ustekinumab.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94235,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of dermatological treatment\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"2398170\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of dermatological treatment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09546634.2024.2398170\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of dermatological treatment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09546634.2024.2398170","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:生物仿制药的出现可能会增加银屑病患者使用生物制剂的剂量升级频率:生物仿制药的出现可能会增加银屑病患者使用生物制剂进行剂量升级的频率:探讨阿达木单抗依那西普和乌司他珠单抗剂量升级的频率和结果:数据来自瑞典斯德哥尔摩的银屑病登记处DermaReg-Pso。主要暴露是治疗,主要结果是剂量升级。我们通过估计药物存活率以及银屑病面积和严重程度指数(PASI)的变化来描述剂量升级的结果:554名患者接受了946次阿达木单抗、依那西普或乌斯特库单抗治疗。剂量升级的累积发生率为每100个治疗年4.1次。乌司替尼与阿达木单抗、乌司替尼与依那西普的剂量升级危险比(HRs)分别为1.93(95% CI:1.25-2.98)和2.20(95% CI:1.42-3.41)。剂量升级后,阿达木单抗和依那西普与乌斯特库单抗相比,停止治疗的HR分别为3.10(95% CI:1.56-6.18)和7.15(95% CI:3.96-12.94)。依那西普的PASI在剂量升级后高于剂量升级前(p = 0.036),但阿达木单抗(p = 0.832)或乌斯特库单抗(p = 0.300)的PASI则不高于剂量升级前:结论:与阿达木单抗或依那西普相比,乌司替库单抗的剂量升级更为频繁;然而,阿达木单抗和依那西普在剂量升级后中断治疗的情况比乌司替库单抗更为常见。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Frequency and outcomes of treatment dose escalation with biologics in moderate-to-severe psoriasis: a Swedish register study.

Background: The advent of biosimilars may increase the frequency of dose escalation with biologics in psoriasis.

Objective: To explore the frequency and outcomes of dose escalation with adalimumab etanercept, and ustekinumab.

Methods: Data were extracted from DermaReg-Pso, a psoriasis register in Stockholm, Sweden. The main exposure was treatment, and the main outcome was dose escalation. We describe outcomes with dose escalation by estimating drug survival and changes in the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI).

Results: 554 patients had 946 treatment episodes with adalimumab, etanercept, or ustekinumab. The cumulative incidence of dose escalation was 4.1 per 100 treatment years. The Hazard Ratios (HRs) for dose escalation with ustekinumab vs adalimumab and ustekinumab vs etanercept were 1.93 (95% CI: 1.25-2.98), and 2.20 (95% CI: 1.42-3.41), respectively. After dose escalation, the HRs for treatment discontinuation with adalimumab and etanercept compared with ustekinumab were 3.10 (95% CI: 1.56-6.18) and 7.15 (95% CI: 3.96-12.94), respectively. PASI was higher after compared to before dose escalation for etanercept (p = 0.036), but not for adalimumab (p = 0.832) or ustekinumab (p = 0.300).

Conclusions: Dose escalation was comparatively more frequent with ustekinumab than with adalimumab or etanercept; however, treatment discontinuation after dose escalation was more common with adalimumab and etanercept than ustekinumab.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Efficacy and safety of sofpironium in treatment of primary hyperhidrosis: a systematic review. Efficacy and safety of 308-nm Excimer lamp combined with Tacrolimus 0.1% ointment vs Tacrolimus 0.1% ointment as monotherapy in treating children with limited vitiligo: a randomized controlled trial. The wide variety of methotrexate dosing regimens for the treatment of atopic dermatitis: a systematic review. Comparing Mohs micrographic surgery and wide local excision in the management of head and neck dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans: a scoping review. The primary role of sebum in the pathophysiology of acne vulgaris and its therapeutic relevance in acne management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1