激素受体阳性、人表皮生长因子受体 2 阴性乳腺癌新辅助化疗后的主要病理反应和长期临床疗效

IF 5.7 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Breast Pub Date : 2024-08-30 DOI:10.1016/j.breast.2024.103792
Lei Ji , Xi Chen , Xiaoyan Qian, Min Xiao, Qing Li, Qiao Li, Jiayu Wang, Ying Fan, Yang Luo, Shanshan Chen, Fei Ma, Binghe Xu, Pin Zhang
{"title":"激素受体阳性、人表皮生长因子受体 2 阴性乳腺癌新辅助化疗后的主要病理反应和长期临床疗效","authors":"Lei Ji ,&nbsp;Xi Chen ,&nbsp;Xiaoyan Qian,&nbsp;Min Xiao,&nbsp;Qing Li,&nbsp;Qiao Li,&nbsp;Jiayu Wang,&nbsp;Ying Fan,&nbsp;Yang Luo,&nbsp;Shanshan Chen,&nbsp;Fei Ma,&nbsp;Binghe Xu,&nbsp;Pin Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.breast.2024.103792","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The majority of HR+/HER2-breast cancer patients can also achieve long-term survival despite not attaining pCR, indicating limited prognostic value of pCR in this population. This study aimed to identify novel pathologic end points for predicting long-term outcomes in HR+/HER2-breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We analyzed HR+/HER2-breast cancer patients with stage II-III tumors who underwent curative surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy from three hospitals. Major pathologic response (MPR), defined as the presence of Miller-Payne grades 3–5 and positive lymph node ratio of ≤10 %, was used as a pathological evaluation indicator. We assessed the association between MPR and event-free survival (EFS) and performed Multivariable Cox regression to identify independent factors associated with EFS.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>From January 2010 to December 2020, 386 patients were included in the final analysis. 28 patients (7.3 %) achieved pCR and 118 patients (30.6 %) achieved MPR. The median duration of follow-up was 54.4 months,5-year EFS was 87 % in the MPR group vs. 68 % in the non-MPR group. Multivariate analysis showed that low PR expression, high clinical stage, lower Miller–Payne grades and Positive lymph node ratio were independent poor prognostic factors for EFS (all <em>P</em> values &lt; 0.05). The prognostic effect of MPR remained in multivariable models (hazard ratio (HR), 0.45; 95 % confidence interval (CI), 0.26–0.76; P = 0.008), In non-pCR patients, those who achieved MPR exhibited a similar EFS compared with pCR patients (HR, 2.25; 95 % CI, 0.51–9.84; P = 0.28).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>MPR may be a novel pathologic end point in HR+/HER2-breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, holding greater applicability in the prognosis evaluation than pCR.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":9093,"journal":{"name":"Breast","volume":"78 ","pages":"Article 103792"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960977624001231/pdfft?md5=dce3d644e7cae1158e86caa08273db64&pid=1-s2.0-S0960977624001231-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Major pathologic response and long-term clinical benefit in hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy\",\"authors\":\"Lei Ji ,&nbsp;Xi Chen ,&nbsp;Xiaoyan Qian,&nbsp;Min Xiao,&nbsp;Qing Li,&nbsp;Qiao Li,&nbsp;Jiayu Wang,&nbsp;Ying Fan,&nbsp;Yang Luo,&nbsp;Shanshan Chen,&nbsp;Fei Ma,&nbsp;Binghe Xu,&nbsp;Pin Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.breast.2024.103792\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The majority of HR+/HER2-breast cancer patients can also achieve long-term survival despite not attaining pCR, indicating limited prognostic value of pCR in this population. This study aimed to identify novel pathologic end points for predicting long-term outcomes in HR+/HER2-breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We analyzed HR+/HER2-breast cancer patients with stage II-III tumors who underwent curative surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy from three hospitals. Major pathologic response (MPR), defined as the presence of Miller-Payne grades 3–5 and positive lymph node ratio of ≤10 %, was used as a pathological evaluation indicator. We assessed the association between MPR and event-free survival (EFS) and performed Multivariable Cox regression to identify independent factors associated with EFS.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>From January 2010 to December 2020, 386 patients were included in the final analysis. 28 patients (7.3 %) achieved pCR and 118 patients (30.6 %) achieved MPR. The median duration of follow-up was 54.4 months,5-year EFS was 87 % in the MPR group vs. 68 % in the non-MPR group. Multivariate analysis showed that low PR expression, high clinical stage, lower Miller–Payne grades and Positive lymph node ratio were independent poor prognostic factors for EFS (all <em>P</em> values &lt; 0.05). The prognostic effect of MPR remained in multivariable models (hazard ratio (HR), 0.45; 95 % confidence interval (CI), 0.26–0.76; P = 0.008), In non-pCR patients, those who achieved MPR exhibited a similar EFS compared with pCR patients (HR, 2.25; 95 % CI, 0.51–9.84; P = 0.28).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>MPR may be a novel pathologic end point in HR+/HER2-breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, holding greater applicability in the prognosis evaluation than pCR.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9093,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Breast\",\"volume\":\"78 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103792\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960977624001231/pdfft?md5=dce3d644e7cae1158e86caa08273db64&pid=1-s2.0-S0960977624001231-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Breast\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960977624001231\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Breast","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960977624001231","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景大多数HR+/HER2-乳腺癌患者虽然没有达到pCR,但也能获得长期生存,这表明pCR在这一人群中的预后价值有限。本研究旨在确定新的病理终点,以预测HR+/HER2-乳腺癌患者新辅助化疗后的长期预后。方法 我们分析了来自三家医院、在新辅助化疗后接受根治性手术的II-III期HR+/HER2-乳腺癌患者。主要病理反应(MPR)被定义为米勒-佩恩3-5级和淋巴结阳性率≤10%,作为病理评估指标。我们评估了 MPR 与无事件生存期(EFS)之间的关系,并进行了多变量 Cox 回归以确定与 EFS 相关的独立因素。28名患者(7.3%)获得了pCR,118名患者(30.6%)获得了MPR。中位随访时间为54.4个月,MPR组5年EFS为87%,非MPR组为68%。多变量分析显示,低 PR 表达、高临床分期、较低的 Miller-Payne 分级和阳性淋巴结比例是 EFS 的独立不良预后因素(所有 P 值均为 0.05)。在多变量模型中,MPR 的预后效应依然存在(危险比(HR),0.45;95 % 置信区间(CI),0.26-0.76;P = 0.008)。结论MPR可能是新辅助化疗后HR+/HER2-乳腺癌的一个新的病理终点,在预后评估中比pCR更适用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Major pathologic response and long-term clinical benefit in hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy

Background

The majority of HR+/HER2-breast cancer patients can also achieve long-term survival despite not attaining pCR, indicating limited prognostic value of pCR in this population. This study aimed to identify novel pathologic end points for predicting long-term outcomes in HR+/HER2-breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Methods

We analyzed HR+/HER2-breast cancer patients with stage II-III tumors who underwent curative surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy from three hospitals. Major pathologic response (MPR), defined as the presence of Miller-Payne grades 3–5 and positive lymph node ratio of ≤10 %, was used as a pathological evaluation indicator. We assessed the association between MPR and event-free survival (EFS) and performed Multivariable Cox regression to identify independent factors associated with EFS.

Results

From January 2010 to December 2020, 386 patients were included in the final analysis. 28 patients (7.3 %) achieved pCR and 118 patients (30.6 %) achieved MPR. The median duration of follow-up was 54.4 months,5-year EFS was 87 % in the MPR group vs. 68 % in the non-MPR group. Multivariate analysis showed that low PR expression, high clinical stage, lower Miller–Payne grades and Positive lymph node ratio were independent poor prognostic factors for EFS (all P values < 0.05). The prognostic effect of MPR remained in multivariable models (hazard ratio (HR), 0.45; 95 % confidence interval (CI), 0.26–0.76; P = 0.008), In non-pCR patients, those who achieved MPR exhibited a similar EFS compared with pCR patients (HR, 2.25; 95 % CI, 0.51–9.84; P = 0.28).

Conclusion

MPR may be a novel pathologic end point in HR+/HER2-breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, holding greater applicability in the prognosis evaluation than pCR.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Breast
Breast 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
2.60%
发文量
165
审稿时长
59 days
期刊介绍: The Breast is an international, multidisciplinary journal for researchers and clinicians, which focuses on translational and clinical research for the advancement of breast cancer prevention, diagnosis and treatment of all stages.
期刊最新文献
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer in Italy: A Senonetwork analysis of 37,215 patients treated from 2017 to 2022. Treatment of oligometastatic breast cancer: The role of patient selection. Targeted therapeutic strategies for Nectin-4 in breast cancer: Recent advances and future prospects. Current and future burden of breast cancer in Asia: A GLOBOCAN data analysis for 2022 and 2050 Influence of ethnicity on cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor efficacy and toxicity: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1