阿卡布替尼联合苯达莫司汀和利妥昔单抗对治疗无效或复发/难治套细胞淋巴瘤患者的安全性和有效性:Ib期试验。

IF 8.2 1区 医学 Q1 HEMATOLOGY Haematologica Pub Date : 2024-09-05 DOI:10.3324/haematol.2023.284896
Tycel Phillips, Michael Wang, Tadeusz Robak, David Gallinson, Don Stevens, Krish Patel, Safaa Ramadan, Chuan-Chuan Wun, Wojciech Jurczak, Stephen D Smith
{"title":"阿卡布替尼联合苯达莫司汀和利妥昔单抗对治疗无效或复发/难治套细胞淋巴瘤患者的安全性和有效性:Ib期试验。","authors":"Tycel Phillips, Michael Wang, Tadeusz Robak, David Gallinson, Don Stevens, Krish Patel, Safaa Ramadan, Chuan-Chuan Wun, Wojciech Jurczak, Stephen D Smith","doi":"10.3324/haematol.2023.284896","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This multicenter, open-label, phase 1b study (ACE-LY-106) assessed the safety and efficacy of acalabrutinib, bendamustine, and rituximab (ABR) in treatment-naive (TN) and relapsed or refractory (R/R) mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). Patients received acalabrutinib from cycle 1 until disease progression or treatment discontinuation, bendamustine on days 1 and 2 of each cycle for up to 6 cycles, and rituximab on day 1 of each cycle for 6 cycles, continuing every other cycle from cycle 8 for 12 additional doses (TN cohort). Eighteen patients enrolled in the TN and 20 in the R/R cohort. Median duration of exposure to acalabrutinib was 34.0 and 14.6 months in the TN and R/R cohorts, respectively. No new safety risks were identified, and most adverse events (AEs) were grades 1 or 2. Thirteen patients from the TN cohort (72.2%) and 17 patients from the R/R cohort (85.0%) reported grade 3-4 AEs, most commonly neutropenia (TN: 38.9%, R/R: 50.0%). AEs leading to death were pneumonitis (n=1, TN cohort), COVID-19, and cerebrospinal meningitis (n=1 each, R/R cohort). Overall response was 94.4% and 85.0% in the TN and R/R cohorts, respectively; complete response rates were 77.8% and 70.0%, respectively. After a median follow-up of 47.6 months, median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were not reached in the TN cohort. After a median follow-up of 20.4 months, median PFS was 28.6 months and OS was not reached in the R/R cohort. Results indicate that ABR was safe and efficacious, supporting further study in patients with TN MCL. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02717624.</p>","PeriodicalId":12964,"journal":{"name":"Haematologica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Safety and efficacy of acalabrutinib plus bendamustine and rituximab in patients with treatment-naive or relapsed / refractory mantle cell lymphoma: phase Ib trial.\",\"authors\":\"Tycel Phillips, Michael Wang, Tadeusz Robak, David Gallinson, Don Stevens, Krish Patel, Safaa Ramadan, Chuan-Chuan Wun, Wojciech Jurczak, Stephen D Smith\",\"doi\":\"10.3324/haematol.2023.284896\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This multicenter, open-label, phase 1b study (ACE-LY-106) assessed the safety and efficacy of acalabrutinib, bendamustine, and rituximab (ABR) in treatment-naive (TN) and relapsed or refractory (R/R) mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). Patients received acalabrutinib from cycle 1 until disease progression or treatment discontinuation, bendamustine on days 1 and 2 of each cycle for up to 6 cycles, and rituximab on day 1 of each cycle for 6 cycles, continuing every other cycle from cycle 8 for 12 additional doses (TN cohort). Eighteen patients enrolled in the TN and 20 in the R/R cohort. Median duration of exposure to acalabrutinib was 34.0 and 14.6 months in the TN and R/R cohorts, respectively. No new safety risks were identified, and most adverse events (AEs) were grades 1 or 2. Thirteen patients from the TN cohort (72.2%) and 17 patients from the R/R cohort (85.0%) reported grade 3-4 AEs, most commonly neutropenia (TN: 38.9%, R/R: 50.0%). AEs leading to death were pneumonitis (n=1, TN cohort), COVID-19, and cerebrospinal meningitis (n=1 each, R/R cohort). Overall response was 94.4% and 85.0% in the TN and R/R cohorts, respectively; complete response rates were 77.8% and 70.0%, respectively. After a median follow-up of 47.6 months, median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were not reached in the TN cohort. After a median follow-up of 20.4 months, median PFS was 28.6 months and OS was not reached in the R/R cohort. Results indicate that ABR was safe and efficacious, supporting further study in patients with TN MCL. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02717624.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12964,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Haematologica\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Haematologica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3324/haematol.2023.284896\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Haematologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3324/haematol.2023.284896","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项多中心、开放标签、1b期研究(ACE-LY-106)评估了阿卡鲁替尼、苯达莫司汀和利妥昔单抗(ABR)治疗未接受治疗(TN)和复发或难治(R/R)套细胞淋巴瘤(MCL)的安全性和有效性。患者从第1周期开始接受阿卡布替尼治疗,直到疾病进展或治疗中止;每个周期的第1天和第2天接受苯达莫司汀治疗,最多6个周期;每个周期的第1天接受利妥昔单抗治疗,共6个周期,从第8周期开始每隔一个周期再接受12次治疗(TN队列)。18名患者加入TN队列,20名患者加入R/R队列。TN组和R/R组患者接受阿卡鲁替尼治疗的中位时间分别为34.0个月和14.6个月。未发现新的安全性风险,大多数不良事件(AEs)为1级或2级。13名TN队列患者(72.2%)和17名R/R队列患者(85.0%)报告了3-4级不良事件,最常见的是中性粒细胞减少(TN:38.9%,R/R:50.0%)。导致死亡的AE为肺炎(1例,TN队列)、COVID-19和脑脊髓膜炎(各1例,R/R队列)。TN组和R/R组的总反应率分别为94.4%和85.0%;完全反应率分别为77.8%和70.0%。在中位随访 47.6 个月后,TN 组的无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)均未达到中位数。在中位随访 20.4 个月后,R/R 组群的中位无进展生存期为 28.6 个月,OS 未达标。结果表明,ABR安全有效,支持对TN MCL患者进行进一步研究。ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符:NCT02717624:NCT02717624。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Safety and efficacy of acalabrutinib plus bendamustine and rituximab in patients with treatment-naive or relapsed / refractory mantle cell lymphoma: phase Ib trial.

This multicenter, open-label, phase 1b study (ACE-LY-106) assessed the safety and efficacy of acalabrutinib, bendamustine, and rituximab (ABR) in treatment-naive (TN) and relapsed or refractory (R/R) mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). Patients received acalabrutinib from cycle 1 until disease progression or treatment discontinuation, bendamustine on days 1 and 2 of each cycle for up to 6 cycles, and rituximab on day 1 of each cycle for 6 cycles, continuing every other cycle from cycle 8 for 12 additional doses (TN cohort). Eighteen patients enrolled in the TN and 20 in the R/R cohort. Median duration of exposure to acalabrutinib was 34.0 and 14.6 months in the TN and R/R cohorts, respectively. No new safety risks were identified, and most adverse events (AEs) were grades 1 or 2. Thirteen patients from the TN cohort (72.2%) and 17 patients from the R/R cohort (85.0%) reported grade 3-4 AEs, most commonly neutropenia (TN: 38.9%, R/R: 50.0%). AEs leading to death were pneumonitis (n=1, TN cohort), COVID-19, and cerebrospinal meningitis (n=1 each, R/R cohort). Overall response was 94.4% and 85.0% in the TN and R/R cohorts, respectively; complete response rates were 77.8% and 70.0%, respectively. After a median follow-up of 47.6 months, median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were not reached in the TN cohort. After a median follow-up of 20.4 months, median PFS was 28.6 months and OS was not reached in the R/R cohort. Results indicate that ABR was safe and efficacious, supporting further study in patients with TN MCL. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02717624.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Haematologica
Haematologica 医学-血液学
CiteScore
14.10
自引率
2.00%
发文量
349
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Haematologica is a journal that publishes articles within the broad field of hematology. It reports on novel findings in basic, clinical, and translational research. Scope: The scope of the journal includes reporting novel research results that: Have a significant impact on understanding normal hematology or the development of hematological diseases. Are likely to bring important changes to the diagnosis or treatment of hematological diseases.
期刊最新文献
Arsenic trioxide versus Realgar-Indigo naturalis formula in non-high-risk acute promyelocytic leukemia: a multicenter, randomized trial. Comparison of EasyM, a clonotypic mass spectrometry assay, and EuroFlow minimal residual disease assessment in multiple myeloma. Cumulative review of hypertension in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia treated with acalabrutinib. Von Willebrand Disease and Angiodysplasia: a wider view of pathogenesis in pursuit of therapy. Outcomes with intensive treatment for acute myeloid leukemia: an analysis of two decades of data from the HARMONY Alliance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1