老年急性髓细胞性白血病强化治疗患者的风险分层

IF 42.1 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Journal of Clinical Oncology Pub Date : 2024-09-04 DOI:10.1200/JCO.23.02631
Jurjen Versluis, Marlen Metzner, Ariel Wang, Patrycja Gradowska, Abin Thomas, Niels Asger Jakobsen, Alison Kennedy, Rachel Moore, Emma Boertjes, Christian M Vonk, Francois G Kavelaars, Melissa Rijken, Amanda Gilkes, Claire Schwab, H Berna Beverloo, Markus Manz, Otto Visser, Catharina H M J Van Elssen, Okke de Weerdt, Lidwine W Tick, Bart J Biemond, Marie-Christiane Vekemans, Sylvie D Freeman, Christine J Harrison, Jonathan A Cook, Mike Dennis, Steven Knapper, Ian Thomas, Charles Craddock, Gert J Ossenkoppele, Bob Löwenberg, Nigel Russell, Peter J M Valk, Paresh Vyas
{"title":"老年急性髓细胞性白血病强化治疗患者的风险分层","authors":"Jurjen Versluis, Marlen Metzner, Ariel Wang, Patrycja Gradowska, Abin Thomas, Niels Asger Jakobsen, Alison Kennedy, Rachel Moore, Emma Boertjes, Christian M Vonk, Francois G Kavelaars, Melissa Rijken, Amanda Gilkes, Claire Schwab, H Berna Beverloo, Markus Manz, Otto Visser, Catharina H M J Van Elssen, Okke de Weerdt, Lidwine W Tick, Bart J Biemond, Marie-Christiane Vekemans, Sylvie D Freeman, Christine J Harrison, Jonathan A Cook, Mike Dennis, Steven Knapper, Ian Thomas, Charles Craddock, Gert J Ossenkoppele, Bob Löwenberg, Nigel Russell, Peter J M Valk, Paresh Vyas","doi":"10.1200/JCO.23.02631","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>AML is a genetically heterogeneous disease, particularly in older patients. In patients older than 60 years, survival rates are variable after the most important curative approach, intensive chemotherapy followed by allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT). Thus, there is an urgent need in clinical practice for a prognostic model to identify older patients with AML who benefit from curative treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We studied 1,910 intensively treated patients older than 60 years with AML and high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (HR-MDS) from two cohorts (NCRI-AML18 and HOVON-SAKK). The median patient age was 67 years. Using a random survival forest, clinical, molecular, and cytogenetic variables were evaluated in an AML development cohort (n = 1,204) for association with overall survival (OS). Relative weights of selected variables determined the prognostic model, which was validated in AML (n = 491) and HR-MDS cohorts (n = 215).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The complete cohort had a high frequency of poor-risk features, including 2022 European LeukemiaNet adverse-risk (57.3%), mutated <i>TP53</i> (14.4%), and myelodysplasia-related genetic features (65.1%). Nine variables were used to construct four groups with highly distinct 4-year OS in the (1) AML development, (2) AML validation, and (3) HR-MDS test cohorts ([1] favorable: 54% ± 4%, intermediate: 38% ± 2%, poor: 21% ± 2%, very poor: 4% ± 1%; [2] 54% ± 9%, 43% ± 4%, 27% ± 4%, 4% ± 3%; and [3] 54% ± 10%, 33% ± 6%, 14% ± 5%, 0% ± 3%, respectively). This new AML60+ classification improves current prognostic classifications. Importantly, patients within the AML60+ intermediate- and very poor-risk group significantly benefited from allo-HCT, whereas the poor-risk patients showed an indication, albeit nonsignificant, for improved outcome after allo-HCT.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The new AML60+ classification provides prognostic information for intensively treated patients 60 years and older with AML and HR-MDS and identifies patients who benefit from intensive chemotherapy and allo-HCT.</p>","PeriodicalId":15384,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":42.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risk Stratification in Older Intensively Treated Patients With AML.\",\"authors\":\"Jurjen Versluis, Marlen Metzner, Ariel Wang, Patrycja Gradowska, Abin Thomas, Niels Asger Jakobsen, Alison Kennedy, Rachel Moore, Emma Boertjes, Christian M Vonk, Francois G Kavelaars, Melissa Rijken, Amanda Gilkes, Claire Schwab, H Berna Beverloo, Markus Manz, Otto Visser, Catharina H M J Van Elssen, Okke de Weerdt, Lidwine W Tick, Bart J Biemond, Marie-Christiane Vekemans, Sylvie D Freeman, Christine J Harrison, Jonathan A Cook, Mike Dennis, Steven Knapper, Ian Thomas, Charles Craddock, Gert J Ossenkoppele, Bob Löwenberg, Nigel Russell, Peter J M Valk, Paresh Vyas\",\"doi\":\"10.1200/JCO.23.02631\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>AML is a genetically heterogeneous disease, particularly in older patients. In patients older than 60 years, survival rates are variable after the most important curative approach, intensive chemotherapy followed by allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT). Thus, there is an urgent need in clinical practice for a prognostic model to identify older patients with AML who benefit from curative treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We studied 1,910 intensively treated patients older than 60 years with AML and high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (HR-MDS) from two cohorts (NCRI-AML18 and HOVON-SAKK). The median patient age was 67 years. Using a random survival forest, clinical, molecular, and cytogenetic variables were evaluated in an AML development cohort (n = 1,204) for association with overall survival (OS). Relative weights of selected variables determined the prognostic model, which was validated in AML (n = 491) and HR-MDS cohorts (n = 215).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The complete cohort had a high frequency of poor-risk features, including 2022 European LeukemiaNet adverse-risk (57.3%), mutated <i>TP53</i> (14.4%), and myelodysplasia-related genetic features (65.1%). Nine variables were used to construct four groups with highly distinct 4-year OS in the (1) AML development, (2) AML validation, and (3) HR-MDS test cohorts ([1] favorable: 54% ± 4%, intermediate: 38% ± 2%, poor: 21% ± 2%, very poor: 4% ± 1%; [2] 54% ± 9%, 43% ± 4%, 27% ± 4%, 4% ± 3%; and [3] 54% ± 10%, 33% ± 6%, 14% ± 5%, 0% ± 3%, respectively). This new AML60+ classification improves current prognostic classifications. Importantly, patients within the AML60+ intermediate- and very poor-risk group significantly benefited from allo-HCT, whereas the poor-risk patients showed an indication, albeit nonsignificant, for improved outcome after allo-HCT.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The new AML60+ classification provides prognostic information for intensively treated patients 60 years and older with AML and HR-MDS and identifies patients who benefit from intensive chemotherapy and allo-HCT.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15384,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Oncology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":42.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.23.02631\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.23.02631","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:急性髓细胞性白血病是一种基因异质性疾病,尤其是在老年患者中。对于 60 岁以上的患者来说,最重要的治疗方法是强化化疗后进行异基因造血细胞移植(allo-HCT),但其存活率却不尽相同。因此,在临床实践中迫切需要一种预后模型来识别从根治性治疗中获益的老年急性髓细胞性白血病患者:我们研究了来自两个队列(NCRI-AML18 和 HOVON-SAKK)的 1,910 名接受强化治疗的 60 岁以上急性髓细胞白血病和高危骨髓增生异常综合征(HR-MDS)患者。患者年龄中位数为 67 岁。利用随机生存森林对急性髓细胞性白血病发展队列(n = 1,204)中的临床、分子和细胞遗传学变量与总生存期(OS)的关系进行了评估。选定变量的相对权重决定了预后模型,该模型在急性髓细胞性白血病队列(n = 491)和HR-MDS队列(n = 215)中得到了验证:结果:整个队列具有高频率的低危特征,包括2022欧洲白血病网络不良风险(57.3%)、TP53突变(14.4%)和骨髓增生异常相关遗传特征(65.1%)。在(1) AML 发展、(2) AML 验证和(3) HR-MDS 测试队列([1] 有利组:54% ± 4%,中间组:5454% ± 4%,中等38%±2%,差:21%±2%,极差:4%±1%;[2]分别为54%±9%、43%±4%、27%±4%、4%±3%;[3]分别为54%±10%、33%±6%、14%±5%、0%±3%)。这种新的 AML60+ 分类改进了目前的预后分类。重要的是,AML60+中危和极危组患者明显受益于同种异体血细胞移植,而低危患者在同种异体血细胞移植后预后改善的迹象虽然不明显:结论:新的AML60+分类为接受强化治疗的60岁及以上急性髓细胞性白血病和HR-MDS患者提供了预后信息,并确定了从强化化疗和allo-HCT中获益的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Risk Stratification in Older Intensively Treated Patients With AML.

Purpose: AML is a genetically heterogeneous disease, particularly in older patients. In patients older than 60 years, survival rates are variable after the most important curative approach, intensive chemotherapy followed by allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT). Thus, there is an urgent need in clinical practice for a prognostic model to identify older patients with AML who benefit from curative treatment.

Methods: We studied 1,910 intensively treated patients older than 60 years with AML and high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (HR-MDS) from two cohorts (NCRI-AML18 and HOVON-SAKK). The median patient age was 67 years. Using a random survival forest, clinical, molecular, and cytogenetic variables were evaluated in an AML development cohort (n = 1,204) for association with overall survival (OS). Relative weights of selected variables determined the prognostic model, which was validated in AML (n = 491) and HR-MDS cohorts (n = 215).

Results: The complete cohort had a high frequency of poor-risk features, including 2022 European LeukemiaNet adverse-risk (57.3%), mutated TP53 (14.4%), and myelodysplasia-related genetic features (65.1%). Nine variables were used to construct four groups with highly distinct 4-year OS in the (1) AML development, (2) AML validation, and (3) HR-MDS test cohorts ([1] favorable: 54% ± 4%, intermediate: 38% ± 2%, poor: 21% ± 2%, very poor: 4% ± 1%; [2] 54% ± 9%, 43% ± 4%, 27% ± 4%, 4% ± 3%; and [3] 54% ± 10%, 33% ± 6%, 14% ± 5%, 0% ± 3%, respectively). This new AML60+ classification improves current prognostic classifications. Importantly, patients within the AML60+ intermediate- and very poor-risk group significantly benefited from allo-HCT, whereas the poor-risk patients showed an indication, albeit nonsignificant, for improved outcome after allo-HCT.

Conclusion: The new AML60+ classification provides prognostic information for intensively treated patients 60 years and older with AML and HR-MDS and identifies patients who benefit from intensive chemotherapy and allo-HCT.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Journal of Clinical Oncology 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
41.20
自引率
2.20%
发文量
8215
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Oncology serves its readers as the single most credible, authoritative resource for disseminating significant clinical oncology research. In print and in electronic format, JCO strives to publish the highest quality articles dedicated to clinical research. Original Reports remain the focus of JCO, but this scientific communication is enhanced by appropriately selected Editorials, Commentaries, Reviews, and other work that relate to the care of patients with cancer.
期刊最新文献
Clinical Study Report and Individual Participant Data Transparency for US Food and Drug Administration-Approved Anticancer Drugs: A Call for Systematic Data Availability. Stockholm3 in a Multiethnic Cohort for Prostate Cancer Detection (SEPTA): A Prospective Multicentered Trial. Prospective Study of Supplemental Screening With Contrast-Enhanced Mammography in Women With Elevated Risk of Breast Cancer: Results of the Prevalence Round. How Could We Further Improve the Gilteritinib Maintenance After Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation in FLT3-Mutated AML? Reply to S. Fuji.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1