{"title":"在意外用药过量死亡病例中,通过尸检浸量尺检测评估死后尿液中芬太尼的检测情况。","authors":"Anson Tsang, Luke N Rodda","doi":"10.1093/jat/bkae072","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Accidental overdose cases continue to rise due to the opioid epidemic in the USA, namely, the widespread availability and use of fentanyl. Medical examiners and coroners across the country have been subsequently burdened, and with limited resources, some seek alternative triaging processes to identify overdoses. Point-of-care urine dipstick testing at autopsy is one such idea that may be used in various ways to instigate or negate the need for an autopsy or regular forensic toxicology laboratory testing. This study investigated the frequency and estimated quantitative fentanyl and norfentanyl concentrations in the postmortem urine of fentanyl-related accidental overdose deaths, as well as the effectiveness of commercially available point-of-care urine dipstick tests based on such concentrations. A total of 1550 fentanyl-related accidental overdose cases, where both the postmortem peripheral femoral blood and urine were tested, were reviewed. Of these, using sensitive liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS-MS) laboratory testing, 82 cases (5%) had a positive fentanyl or norfentanyl detection in the blood, while fentanyl or norfentanyl remained undetected in the urine. Furthermore, a comparison of commercially available urine dipstick test cut-offs and authentic casework with estimated urine concentrations revealed that at a fentanyl/norfentanyl cut-off level of 5 ng/mL, 19% of these fentanyl-related accidental overdoses would result in a false negative, 24% at 10 ng/mL, 25% at 20 ng/mL, 51% at 50 ng/mL, and 61% at 100 ng/mL. The study found that the use of urine dipstick tests, as a decision-maker for the initiation of further comprehensive routine toxicology laboratory testing, or to support cause and manner of death determination, leads to both false-positive and false-negative predictions in fentanyl accidental overdoses.</p>","PeriodicalId":14905,"journal":{"name":"Journal of analytical toxicology","volume":" ","pages":"667-671"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of postmortem urine fentanyl detection by autopsy dipstick testing in accidental overdose deaths.\",\"authors\":\"Anson Tsang, Luke N Rodda\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jat/bkae072\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Accidental overdose cases continue to rise due to the opioid epidemic in the USA, namely, the widespread availability and use of fentanyl. Medical examiners and coroners across the country have been subsequently burdened, and with limited resources, some seek alternative triaging processes to identify overdoses. Point-of-care urine dipstick testing at autopsy is one such idea that may be used in various ways to instigate or negate the need for an autopsy or regular forensic toxicology laboratory testing. This study investigated the frequency and estimated quantitative fentanyl and norfentanyl concentrations in the postmortem urine of fentanyl-related accidental overdose deaths, as well as the effectiveness of commercially available point-of-care urine dipstick tests based on such concentrations. A total of 1550 fentanyl-related accidental overdose cases, where both the postmortem peripheral femoral blood and urine were tested, were reviewed. Of these, using sensitive liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS-MS) laboratory testing, 82 cases (5%) had a positive fentanyl or norfentanyl detection in the blood, while fentanyl or norfentanyl remained undetected in the urine. Furthermore, a comparison of commercially available urine dipstick test cut-offs and authentic casework with estimated urine concentrations revealed that at a fentanyl/norfentanyl cut-off level of 5 ng/mL, 19% of these fentanyl-related accidental overdoses would result in a false negative, 24% at 10 ng/mL, 25% at 20 ng/mL, 51% at 50 ng/mL, and 61% at 100 ng/mL. The study found that the use of urine dipstick tests, as a decision-maker for the initiation of further comprehensive routine toxicology laboratory testing, or to support cause and manner of death determination, leads to both false-positive and false-negative predictions in fentanyl accidental overdoses.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14905,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of analytical toxicology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"667-671\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of analytical toxicology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jat/bkae072\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of analytical toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jat/bkae072","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Assessment of postmortem urine fentanyl detection by autopsy dipstick testing in accidental overdose deaths.
Accidental overdose cases continue to rise due to the opioid epidemic in the USA, namely, the widespread availability and use of fentanyl. Medical examiners and coroners across the country have been subsequently burdened, and with limited resources, some seek alternative triaging processes to identify overdoses. Point-of-care urine dipstick testing at autopsy is one such idea that may be used in various ways to instigate or negate the need for an autopsy or regular forensic toxicology laboratory testing. This study investigated the frequency and estimated quantitative fentanyl and norfentanyl concentrations in the postmortem urine of fentanyl-related accidental overdose deaths, as well as the effectiveness of commercially available point-of-care urine dipstick tests based on such concentrations. A total of 1550 fentanyl-related accidental overdose cases, where both the postmortem peripheral femoral blood and urine were tested, were reviewed. Of these, using sensitive liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS-MS) laboratory testing, 82 cases (5%) had a positive fentanyl or norfentanyl detection in the blood, while fentanyl or norfentanyl remained undetected in the urine. Furthermore, a comparison of commercially available urine dipstick test cut-offs and authentic casework with estimated urine concentrations revealed that at a fentanyl/norfentanyl cut-off level of 5 ng/mL, 19% of these fentanyl-related accidental overdoses would result in a false negative, 24% at 10 ng/mL, 25% at 20 ng/mL, 51% at 50 ng/mL, and 61% at 100 ng/mL. The study found that the use of urine dipstick tests, as a decision-maker for the initiation of further comprehensive routine toxicology laboratory testing, or to support cause and manner of death determination, leads to both false-positive and false-negative predictions in fentanyl accidental overdoses.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Analytical Toxicology (JAT) is an international toxicology journal devoted to the timely dissemination of scientific communications concerning potentially toxic substances and drug identification, isolation, and quantitation.
Since its inception in 1977, the Journal of Analytical Toxicology has striven to present state-of-the-art techniques used in toxicology labs. The peer-review process provided by the distinguished members of the Editorial Advisory Board ensures the high-quality and integrity of articles published in the Journal of Analytical Toxicology. Timely presentation of the latest toxicology developments is ensured through Technical Notes, Case Reports, and Letters to the Editor.