{"title":"先天性梨状孔狭窄：并非所有患者都需要开放式修复","authors":"Eelam Adil, Sarah Francisco, Reza Rahbar","doi":"10.1002/ohn.968","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Evaluate the management options for congenital nasal pyriform aperture stenosis (CNPAS).</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Case series.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Tertiary referral children's hospital.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The medical records of CNPAS patients managed from January 2015 to 2023 were reviewed for medical history, management, and outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifteen patients met inclusion criteria. Six patients (40.0%) had a central mega incisor and 4 (26.7%) had holoprosencephaly. Three (20%) patients were managed with medications alone. Mean PA width was similar between patients managed medically versus those managed surgically (mean width 6.2 ± 0.15 mm vs 6.1 ± 0.38 mm). Median age at first procedure was 50 (range 8-263) days. Seven (46.7%) underwent an initial balloon nasal dilation and 5 (33.3%) underwent an open sublabial repair. Operative time was lower in the balloon dilation group (mean 27 vs 104 minutes). Five patients had a single balloon dilation and 2 required revision procedures: 1 underwent a second balloon dilation, and 1 patient underwent a subsequent open sublabial procedure. Four patients with an initial open sublabial approach returned to the operating room for nasal balloon dilation or debridement due to nasal synechiae.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There has been general shift towards minimally invasive surgery. In our series, 8 (53.3%) patients were managed successfully with medical therapy or a single nasal balloon dilation procedure. Of those who underwent an open surgical repair, most (4/5) required a revision procedure due to synechiae. Given the relative success and lower operative time of balloon dilation, this option should be considered in the management algorithm for CNPAS.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: 4: </strong></p>","PeriodicalId":19707,"journal":{"name":"Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"629-634"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Congenital Pyriform Aperture Stenosis: Not All Patients Require Open Repair.\",\"authors\":\"Eelam Adil, Sarah Francisco, Reza Rahbar\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ohn.968\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Evaluate the management options for congenital nasal pyriform aperture stenosis (CNPAS).</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Case series.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Tertiary referral children's hospital.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The medical records of CNPAS patients managed from January 2015 to 2023 were reviewed for medical history, management, and outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifteen patients met inclusion criteria. Six patients (40.0%) had a central mega incisor and 4 (26.7%) had holoprosencephaly. Three (20%) patients were managed with medications alone. Mean PA width was similar between patients managed medically versus those managed surgically (mean width 6.2 ± 0.15 mm vs 6.1 ± 0.38 mm). Median age at first procedure was 50 (range 8-263) days. Seven (46.7%) underwent an initial balloon nasal dilation and 5 (33.3%) underwent an open sublabial repair. Operative time was lower in the balloon dilation group (mean 27 vs 104 minutes). Five patients had a single balloon dilation and 2 required revision procedures: 1 underwent a second balloon dilation, and 1 patient underwent a subsequent open sublabial procedure. Four patients with an initial open sublabial approach returned to the operating room for nasal balloon dilation or debridement due to nasal synechiae.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There has been general shift towards minimally invasive surgery. In our series, 8 (53.3%) patients were managed successfully with medical therapy or a single nasal balloon dilation procedure. Of those who underwent an open surgical repair, most (4/5) required a revision procedure due to synechiae. Given the relative success and lower operative time of balloon dilation, this option should be considered in the management algorithm for CNPAS.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: 4: </strong></p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19707,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"629-634\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/ohn.968\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/5 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ohn.968","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Congenital Pyriform Aperture Stenosis: Not All Patients Require Open Repair.
Objective: Evaluate the management options for congenital nasal pyriform aperture stenosis (CNPAS).
Study design: Case series.
Setting: Tertiary referral children's hospital.
Methods: The medical records of CNPAS patients managed from January 2015 to 2023 were reviewed for medical history, management, and outcomes.
Results: Fifteen patients met inclusion criteria. Six patients (40.0%) had a central mega incisor and 4 (26.7%) had holoprosencephaly. Three (20%) patients were managed with medications alone. Mean PA width was similar between patients managed medically versus those managed surgically (mean width 6.2 ± 0.15 mm vs 6.1 ± 0.38 mm). Median age at first procedure was 50 (range 8-263) days. Seven (46.7%) underwent an initial balloon nasal dilation and 5 (33.3%) underwent an open sublabial repair. Operative time was lower in the balloon dilation group (mean 27 vs 104 minutes). Five patients had a single balloon dilation and 2 required revision procedures: 1 underwent a second balloon dilation, and 1 patient underwent a subsequent open sublabial procedure. Four patients with an initial open sublabial approach returned to the operating room for nasal balloon dilation or debridement due to nasal synechiae.
Conclusion: There has been general shift towards minimally invasive surgery. In our series, 8 (53.3%) patients were managed successfully with medical therapy or a single nasal balloon dilation procedure. Of those who underwent an open surgical repair, most (4/5) required a revision procedure due to synechiae. Given the relative success and lower operative time of balloon dilation, this option should be considered in the management algorithm for CNPAS.
期刊介绍：
Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery (OTO-HNS) is the official peer-reviewed publication of the American Academy of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery Foundation. The mission of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery is to publish contemporary, ethical, clinically relevant information in otolaryngology, head and neck surgery (ear, nose, throat, head, and neck disorders) that can be used by otolaryngologists, clinicians, scientists, and specialists to improve patient care and public health.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
