血管再造和再植手指水蛭疗法失败的预测因素。

IF 0.3 Q4 SURGERY Journal of Hand and Microsurgery Pub Date : 2024-05-28 eCollection Date: 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jham.2024.100080
Sergey Toshinskiy, Michelle Frees, Christopher Hillard
{"title":"血管再造和再植手指水蛭疗法失败的预测因素。","authors":"Sergey Toshinskiy, Michelle Frees, Christopher Hillard","doi":"10.1016/j.jham.2024.100080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Venous congestion is a common phenomenon following digital revascularization and replantation. Leech therapy allows for venous outflow while angiogenesis and neovascularization take place. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of leech therapy in the revascularized and replanted digits and determine risk factors for unsuccessful salvage.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A retrospective review was performed to identify all patients with complete or incomplete digital amputations at an academic Level 1 Trauma Center who underwent digital replantation or revascularization from January 2005 to December 2020. Amputations proximal to the palmar arch as well as revascularizations that showed any degree of perfusion on preoperative assessment were excluded. Leech therapy was initiated as soon as any signs of venous congestion appeared and was titrated to clinical effect. Patient demographics, medical history, injury mechanism, extent and level, operative details, leech therapy details, number of blood transfusions, hospitalization length, as well as the digit's ultimate survival data were collected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 159 patients who underwent 213 digital revascularizations (n ​= ​135) and replantations (n ​= ​78), venous congestion requiring leech therapy developed in 27 digits in the revascularization group and in 26 in the replantation group. Of the digits that were leeched, 15 failed in the revascularization group (56 ​% failure rate) and 17 failed in the replantation group (65 ​% failure rate). Avulsion mechanism of injury and presence of a circumferential laceration were significantly associated with rate of failure in the revascularization cohort (p ​< ​0.01). Proximal level of injury was significantly associated with rate of failure in the replantation group (p ​< ​0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Leech therapy has limited efficacy in avulsed or more proximally injured digits. These data can aid in determining the prognosis of a digit with venous congestion after revascularization and replantation.</p>","PeriodicalId":45368,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hand and Microsurgery","volume":"16 4","pages":"100080"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11369714/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predictors of leech therapy failure in revascularized and replanted digits.\",\"authors\":\"Sergey Toshinskiy, Michelle Frees, Christopher Hillard\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jham.2024.100080\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Venous congestion is a common phenomenon following digital revascularization and replantation. Leech therapy allows for venous outflow while angiogenesis and neovascularization take place. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of leech therapy in the revascularized and replanted digits and determine risk factors for unsuccessful salvage.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A retrospective review was performed to identify all patients with complete or incomplete digital amputations at an academic Level 1 Trauma Center who underwent digital replantation or revascularization from January 2005 to December 2020. Amputations proximal to the palmar arch as well as revascularizations that showed any degree of perfusion on preoperative assessment were excluded. Leech therapy was initiated as soon as any signs of venous congestion appeared and was titrated to clinical effect. Patient demographics, medical history, injury mechanism, extent and level, operative details, leech therapy details, number of blood transfusions, hospitalization length, as well as the digit's ultimate survival data were collected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 159 patients who underwent 213 digital revascularizations (n ​= ​135) and replantations (n ​= ​78), venous congestion requiring leech therapy developed in 27 digits in the revascularization group and in 26 in the replantation group. Of the digits that were leeched, 15 failed in the revascularization group (56 ​% failure rate) and 17 failed in the replantation group (65 ​% failure rate). Avulsion mechanism of injury and presence of a circumferential laceration were significantly associated with rate of failure in the revascularization cohort (p ​< ​0.01). Proximal level of injury was significantly associated with rate of failure in the replantation group (p ​< ​0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Leech therapy has limited efficacy in avulsed or more proximally injured digits. These data can aid in determining the prognosis of a digit with venous congestion after revascularization and replantation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45368,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Hand and Microsurgery\",\"volume\":\"16 4\",\"pages\":\"100080\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11369714/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Hand and Microsurgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jham.2024.100080\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hand and Microsurgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jham.2024.100080","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介静脉充血是数字血管重建和再植术后的常见现象。水蛭疗法可在血管生成和新生血管形成的同时使静脉血流出。本研究的目的是评估水蛭疗法对血管再通和再植手指的疗效,并确定抢救不成功的风险因素:研究人员进行了一项回顾性研究,以确定 2005 年 1 月至 2020 年 12 月期间在学术一级创伤中心接受数字再植或血管再通手术的所有完全或不完全数字截肢患者。排除了掌弓近端截肢以及术前评估显示任何程度灌注的血管再造术。一旦出现任何静脉充血迹象,就立即开始利奇疗法,并根据临床效果进行调整。收集了患者的人口统计学资料、病史、损伤机制、范围和程度、手术细节、水蛭疗法细节、输血次数、住院时间以及最终存活数据:结果:在接受了 213 例数字血管重建术(135 例)和再植术(78 例)的 159 位患者中,血管重建术组有 27 位出现静脉充血,需要进行水蛭疗法;再植术组有 26 位出现静脉充血,需要进行水蛭疗法。在被水蛭感染的手指中,血管重建组有 15 个手指(失败率为 56%)失败,再植组有 17 个手指(失败率为 65%)失败。损伤的撕脱机制和周缘裂伤的存在与血管重建组的失败率显著相关(P 结论:血管重建组的失败率与撕脱机制和周缘裂伤的存在显著相关:利奇疗法对撕脱伤或更近端受伤的拇指疗效有限。这些数据有助于确定血管再通术和再植术后静脉充血手指的预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Predictors of leech therapy failure in revascularized and replanted digits.

Introduction: Venous congestion is a common phenomenon following digital revascularization and replantation. Leech therapy allows for venous outflow while angiogenesis and neovascularization take place. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of leech therapy in the revascularized and replanted digits and determine risk factors for unsuccessful salvage.

Materials and methods: A retrospective review was performed to identify all patients with complete or incomplete digital amputations at an academic Level 1 Trauma Center who underwent digital replantation or revascularization from January 2005 to December 2020. Amputations proximal to the palmar arch as well as revascularizations that showed any degree of perfusion on preoperative assessment were excluded. Leech therapy was initiated as soon as any signs of venous congestion appeared and was titrated to clinical effect. Patient demographics, medical history, injury mechanism, extent and level, operative details, leech therapy details, number of blood transfusions, hospitalization length, as well as the digit's ultimate survival data were collected.

Results: Of the 159 patients who underwent 213 digital revascularizations (n ​= ​135) and replantations (n ​= ​78), venous congestion requiring leech therapy developed in 27 digits in the revascularization group and in 26 in the replantation group. Of the digits that were leeched, 15 failed in the revascularization group (56 ​% failure rate) and 17 failed in the replantation group (65 ​% failure rate). Avulsion mechanism of injury and presence of a circumferential laceration were significantly associated with rate of failure in the revascularization cohort (p ​< ​0.01). Proximal level of injury was significantly associated with rate of failure in the replantation group (p ​< ​0.01).

Conclusion: Leech therapy has limited efficacy in avulsed or more proximally injured digits. These data can aid in determining the prognosis of a digit with venous congestion after revascularization and replantation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
25.00%
发文量
39
期刊最新文献
The modified placenta model for microsurgery training: Recommended methods for comprehensive microsurgery experience. Ulnar shaft diameter as it relates to plate osteosynthesis: A cadaveric study. A cross-sectional quantitative analysis of the readability and quality of online resources regarding thumb carpometacarpal joint replacement surgery. Diagnostic and management strategies for pseudoaneurysm of the ulnar artery: A scoping review. Predictors of leech therapy failure in revascularized and replanted digits.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1