社区姑息关怀开始时被诊断为痴呆症、肺癌和心血管疾病患者的特征:一项基于人群的研究。

IF 2.5 2区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES BMC Palliative Care Pub Date : 2024-09-04 DOI:10.1186/s12904-024-01545-w
Guiyun Wang, Maya Ebrahimi Zanjani, Angus Cook, Yunyun Dai, Minghui Tan, Xinwen Simon Qin, Claire E Johnson, Jinfeng Ding
{"title":"社区姑息关怀开始时被诊断为痴呆症、肺癌和心血管疾病患者的特征:一项基于人群的研究。","authors":"Guiyun Wang, Maya Ebrahimi Zanjani, Angus Cook, Yunyun Dai, Minghui Tan, Xinwen Simon Qin, Claire E Johnson, Jinfeng Ding","doi":"10.1186/s12904-024-01545-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Most people diagnosed with dementia live and die in community settings. This study aimed to: (i) describe the palliative care needs of patients with dementia at commencement of community palliative care; (ii) compare palliative care needs between patients with dementia and those with lung cancer and cardiovascular disease (CVD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a population-based descriptive study that involved 8,727, 7,539 and 25,279 patients who accessed community palliative care across Australia principally because of dementia, CVD and lung cancer. Patients' functional abilities, symptom burden and clinical condition were assessed at commencement of community alliative care using five validated instruments: Resource Utilisation Groups-Activities of Daily Living, Australia-modified Karnofsky Performance Status, Symptoms Assessment Scale, Palliative Care Problem Severity Score and Palliative Care Phase. We fitted ordinal logistic regression models to examine the differences in these assessments for dementia versus CVD and lung cancer, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, patients with dementia generally had low levels of distress from symptoms but poor functional problems. Compared to the other two diagnostic groups, palliative care for dementia was often initiated later and with shorter contacts. Also, patients with dementia presented with poorer functional performance (adjusted OR (aOR) = 4.02, Confidence Interval (CI): 3.68 - 4.38 for dementia vs CVD; aOR = 17.59, CI: 15.92 - 19.44 for dementia vs lung cancer) and dependency (aOR = 5.68, CI: 5.28 - 6.12 for dementia vs CVD; aOR = 24.97, CI: 22.77 - 27.39 for dementia vs lung cancer), but experienced lower levels of distress and problem severity for the majority of symptoms.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Community palliative care is often an ideal care option for many patients, particularly for those with dementia. We call for expansion of the palliative care workforce and options for home care support to optimize accessibility of community palliative care for dementia.</p>","PeriodicalId":48945,"journal":{"name":"BMC Palliative Care","volume":"23 1","pages":"219"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11373479/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Characteristics of people diagnosed with dementia vs lung cancer and cardiovascular disease at commencement of community palliative care: a population-based study.\",\"authors\":\"Guiyun Wang, Maya Ebrahimi Zanjani, Angus Cook, Yunyun Dai, Minghui Tan, Xinwen Simon Qin, Claire E Johnson, Jinfeng Ding\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12904-024-01545-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Most people diagnosed with dementia live and die in community settings. This study aimed to: (i) describe the palliative care needs of patients with dementia at commencement of community palliative care; (ii) compare palliative care needs between patients with dementia and those with lung cancer and cardiovascular disease (CVD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a population-based descriptive study that involved 8,727, 7,539 and 25,279 patients who accessed community palliative care across Australia principally because of dementia, CVD and lung cancer. Patients' functional abilities, symptom burden and clinical condition were assessed at commencement of community alliative care using five validated instruments: Resource Utilisation Groups-Activities of Daily Living, Australia-modified Karnofsky Performance Status, Symptoms Assessment Scale, Palliative Care Problem Severity Score and Palliative Care Phase. We fitted ordinal logistic regression models to examine the differences in these assessments for dementia versus CVD and lung cancer, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, patients with dementia generally had low levels of distress from symptoms but poor functional problems. Compared to the other two diagnostic groups, palliative care for dementia was often initiated later and with shorter contacts. Also, patients with dementia presented with poorer functional performance (adjusted OR (aOR) = 4.02, Confidence Interval (CI): 3.68 - 4.38 for dementia vs CVD; aOR = 17.59, CI: 15.92 - 19.44 for dementia vs lung cancer) and dependency (aOR = 5.68, CI: 5.28 - 6.12 for dementia vs CVD; aOR = 24.97, CI: 22.77 - 27.39 for dementia vs lung cancer), but experienced lower levels of distress and problem severity for the majority of symptoms.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Community palliative care is often an ideal care option for many patients, particularly for those with dementia. We call for expansion of the palliative care workforce and options for home care support to optimize accessibility of community palliative care for dementia.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48945,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Palliative Care\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"219\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11373479/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Palliative Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-024-01545-w\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Palliative Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-024-01545-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:大多数被诊断为痴呆症的患者都在社区环境中生活和死亡。本研究旨在(i) 描述痴呆症患者在开始接受社区姑息关怀时的姑息关怀需求;(ii) 比较痴呆症患者与肺癌和心血管疾病(CVD)患者的姑息关怀需求:这是一项以人群为基础的描述性研究,涉及全澳大利亚分别有8727、7539和25279名主要因痴呆症、心血管疾病和肺癌而接受社区姑息治疗的患者。在开始社区姑息关怀时,使用五种经过验证的工具对患者的功能能力、症状负担和临床状况进行了评估:这些工具包括:资源利用组-日常生活活动、澳大利亚修订版卡诺夫斯基表现状态、症状评估量表、姑息关怀问题严重性评分和姑息关怀阶段。我们分别针对痴呆症与心血管疾病和肺癌建立了序数逻辑回归模型,以检验这些评估结果的差异:总体而言,痴呆症患者的症状痛苦程度普遍较低,但功能问题较严重。与其他两个诊断组相比,痴呆症患者的姑息治疗通常启动较晚,接触时间较短。此外,痴呆症患者的功能表现较差(痴呆症与心血管疾病的调整OR (aOR) = 4.02,置信区间 (CI):3.68 - 4.38;痴呆症与肺癌的调整OR = 17.59,CI:15.92 - 19.44),依赖性也较差(调整OR = 5.68, CI: 5.28 - 6.12 for dementia vs CVD; aOR = 24.97, CI: 22.77 - 27.39 for dementia vs lung cancer),但大多数症状的痛苦程度和问题严重性较低:结论:社区姑息关怀通常是许多患者,尤其是痴呆症患者的理想护理选择。我们呼吁扩大姑息关怀队伍和家庭护理支持选项,以优化痴呆症社区姑息关怀的可及性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Characteristics of people diagnosed with dementia vs lung cancer and cardiovascular disease at commencement of community palliative care: a population-based study.

Background: Most people diagnosed with dementia live and die in community settings. This study aimed to: (i) describe the palliative care needs of patients with dementia at commencement of community palliative care; (ii) compare palliative care needs between patients with dementia and those with lung cancer and cardiovascular disease (CVD).

Methods: This is a population-based descriptive study that involved 8,727, 7,539 and 25,279 patients who accessed community palliative care across Australia principally because of dementia, CVD and lung cancer. Patients' functional abilities, symptom burden and clinical condition were assessed at commencement of community alliative care using five validated instruments: Resource Utilisation Groups-Activities of Daily Living, Australia-modified Karnofsky Performance Status, Symptoms Assessment Scale, Palliative Care Problem Severity Score and Palliative Care Phase. We fitted ordinal logistic regression models to examine the differences in these assessments for dementia versus CVD and lung cancer, respectively.

Results: Overall, patients with dementia generally had low levels of distress from symptoms but poor functional problems. Compared to the other two diagnostic groups, palliative care for dementia was often initiated later and with shorter contacts. Also, patients with dementia presented with poorer functional performance (adjusted OR (aOR) = 4.02, Confidence Interval (CI): 3.68 - 4.38 for dementia vs CVD; aOR = 17.59, CI: 15.92 - 19.44 for dementia vs lung cancer) and dependency (aOR = 5.68, CI: 5.28 - 6.12 for dementia vs CVD; aOR = 24.97, CI: 22.77 - 27.39 for dementia vs lung cancer), but experienced lower levels of distress and problem severity for the majority of symptoms.

Conclusion: Community palliative care is often an ideal care option for many patients, particularly for those with dementia. We call for expansion of the palliative care workforce and options for home care support to optimize accessibility of community palliative care for dementia.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Palliative Care
BMC Palliative Care HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
9.70%
发文量
201
审稿时长
21 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Palliative Care is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in the clinical, scientific, ethical and policy issues, local and international, regarding all aspects of hospice and palliative care for the dying and for those with profound suffering related to chronic illness.
期刊最新文献
Communication about incurable illness and remaining life between spouses and patients with incurable illness receiving specialized home care: effects of a family caregiver-targeted web-based psycho-educational intervention. Correction: Adapting the serious illness conversation guide for unhoused older adults: a rapid qualitative study. Online education in palliative care - A national exploratory multimethod study. The family talk intervention prevent the feeling of loneliness - a long term follow up after a parents life-threatening illness. Is the use of antibiotic stewardship measures in the context of specialized outpatient palliative care sensible and feasible? An interview-based study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1