比较较慢和较快踩踏节奏下的临界功率和呼吸补偿点。

Lorenzo Micheli, Massimo Teso, Nasimi A Guluzade, Matteo Rizzo, Carlo Ferri Marini, Francesco Lucertini, Daniel A Keir, Silvia Pogliaghi
{"title":"比较较慢和较快踩踏节奏下的临界功率和呼吸补偿点。","authors":"Lorenzo Micheli, Massimo Teso, Nasimi A Guluzade, Matteo Rizzo, Carlo Ferri Marini, Francesco Lucertini, Daniel A Keir, Silvia Pogliaghi","doi":"10.1139/apnm-2024-0042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We investigated whether pedal cadence (60 vs 100 rpm) affects oxygen uptake (V̇O2) and power output (PO) at two indexes of the heavy-to-severe-intensity domain boundary (i.e., critical power [CP] and respiratory compensation point [RCP]) and their correspondence. Fourteen adults (7 females, 23±2 yrs) cycled at 60 and 100 rpm during: i) a \"Step-Ramp-Step\" protocol to identify V̇O2 and PO at RCP; ii) 4-5 exhaustive constant-PO bouts for CP identification; and iii) a constant-power bout at CP to identify V̇O2 at CP. Separate two-way repeated measures ANOVA assessed whether V̇O2 and PO were affected by index (CP vs RCP) and cadence (60 vs 100 rpm). The V̇O2 was not affected by index (mean difference [MD]=73±197 mL·min-1; p=0.136) but there was an index x cadence interaction (p=0.014), such that V̇O2 was higher at 100 vs 60 rpm for CP (MD=142±169 mL·min-1; p=0.008) but not RCP (p=0526).. The PO was affected by cadence (MD=13±9 W; p<0.001) and index (MD=8±11 W; p=0.016), with no cadence x index interaction (p=0.168). The systematic bias in PO confirms cadence-specificity of CP and RCP. The relationship between these indexes and their change in unison in PO suggests a mechanistic link between these two heavy-to-severe domain boundary candidates.</p>","PeriodicalId":93878,"journal":{"name":"Applied physiology, nutrition, and metabolism = Physiologie appliquee, nutrition et metabolisme","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparison of critical power and the respiratory compensation point at slower and faster pedaling cadences.\",\"authors\":\"Lorenzo Micheli, Massimo Teso, Nasimi A Guluzade, Matteo Rizzo, Carlo Ferri Marini, Francesco Lucertini, Daniel A Keir, Silvia Pogliaghi\",\"doi\":\"10.1139/apnm-2024-0042\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>We investigated whether pedal cadence (60 vs 100 rpm) affects oxygen uptake (V̇O2) and power output (PO) at two indexes of the heavy-to-severe-intensity domain boundary (i.e., critical power [CP] and respiratory compensation point [RCP]) and their correspondence. Fourteen adults (7 females, 23±2 yrs) cycled at 60 and 100 rpm during: i) a \\\"Step-Ramp-Step\\\" protocol to identify V̇O2 and PO at RCP; ii) 4-5 exhaustive constant-PO bouts for CP identification; and iii) a constant-power bout at CP to identify V̇O2 at CP. Separate two-way repeated measures ANOVA assessed whether V̇O2 and PO were affected by index (CP vs RCP) and cadence (60 vs 100 rpm). The V̇O2 was not affected by index (mean difference [MD]=73±197 mL·min-1; p=0.136) but there was an index x cadence interaction (p=0.014), such that V̇O2 was higher at 100 vs 60 rpm for CP (MD=142±169 mL·min-1; p=0.008) but not RCP (p=0526).. The PO was affected by cadence (MD=13±9 W; p<0.001) and index (MD=8±11 W; p=0.016), with no cadence x index interaction (p=0.168). The systematic bias in PO confirms cadence-specificity of CP and RCP. The relationship between these indexes and their change in unison in PO suggests a mechanistic link between these two heavy-to-severe domain boundary candidates.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93878,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied physiology, nutrition, and metabolism = Physiologie appliquee, nutrition et metabolisme\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied physiology, nutrition, and metabolism = Physiologie appliquee, nutrition et metabolisme\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1139/apnm-2024-0042\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied physiology, nutrition, and metabolism = Physiologie appliquee, nutrition et metabolisme","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1139/apnm-2024-0042","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们研究了蹬踏节奏(60 rpm 与 100 rpm)是否会影响大强度到重强度域边界的两个指标(即临界功率[CP]和呼吸补偿点[RCP])的摄氧量(VO2)和输出功率(PO)及其对应关系。14 名成年人(7 名女性,23±2 岁)以 60 rpm 和 100 rpm 的速度骑车,骑车过程包括:i)"阶梯-斜坡-阶梯 "方案,以确定 RCP 时的 V̇O2 和 PO;ii)4-5 次耗尽的恒定 PO 运动,以确定 CP;iii)CP 时的恒定功率运动,以确定 CP 时的 V̇O2。分别进行的双向重复测量方差分析评估了V.J.O.和P.O.是否受指数(CP vs RCP)和速度(60 rpm vs 100 rpm)的影响。V̇O2 不受指数影响(平均差[MD]=73±197 mL-min-1;p=0.136),但存在指数 x 速率交互作用(p=0.014),即 CP(MD=142±169 mL-min-1;p=0.008)与 RCP(p=0526)相比,100 rpm 与 60 rpm 时的 V̇O2 更高。PO受到步频的影响(MD=13±9 W;p=0.008)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A comparison of critical power and the respiratory compensation point at slower and faster pedaling cadences.

We investigated whether pedal cadence (60 vs 100 rpm) affects oxygen uptake (V̇O2) and power output (PO) at two indexes of the heavy-to-severe-intensity domain boundary (i.e., critical power [CP] and respiratory compensation point [RCP]) and their correspondence. Fourteen adults (7 females, 23±2 yrs) cycled at 60 and 100 rpm during: i) a "Step-Ramp-Step" protocol to identify V̇O2 and PO at RCP; ii) 4-5 exhaustive constant-PO bouts for CP identification; and iii) a constant-power bout at CP to identify V̇O2 at CP. Separate two-way repeated measures ANOVA assessed whether V̇O2 and PO were affected by index (CP vs RCP) and cadence (60 vs 100 rpm). The V̇O2 was not affected by index (mean difference [MD]=73±197 mL·min-1; p=0.136) but there was an index x cadence interaction (p=0.014), such that V̇O2 was higher at 100 vs 60 rpm for CP (MD=142±169 mL·min-1; p=0.008) but not RCP (p=0526).. The PO was affected by cadence (MD=13±9 W; p<0.001) and index (MD=8±11 W; p=0.016), with no cadence x index interaction (p=0.168). The systematic bias in PO confirms cadence-specificity of CP and RCP. The relationship between these indexes and their change in unison in PO suggests a mechanistic link between these two heavy-to-severe domain boundary candidates.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Eating Traditional Foods Enhances Diet Quality Among First Nations in Canada: An Analysis Using the Healthy Eating Food Index-2019 (HEFI-2019) and the Canadian Healthy Eating Index 2007 (C-HEI 2007). Retinol-binding protein 4 is a potential biomarker of changes in lean mass in postmenopausal women. A narrative review of velocity-based training best practice: The importance of contraction intent vs. movement speed. A reduced carbohydrate diet improves glycemic regulation in hyperglycemic older people in a retirement home: The SAGE study. Feet-heating and Calf-heating have Opposing Effects on Glucose Tolerance and Heart Rate Variability: A Randomized, Controlled, Crossover Trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1