{"title":"在接受脐带血移植的患者中，氟达拉滨-美法仑、减量布舒凡与氟达拉滨-美法仑、全量布舒凡的对比。","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.transproceed.2024.08.031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Various reduced-intensity conditioning/reduced-toxicity conditioning regimens have been developed for patients receiving allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. The balance between disease relapse and toxicity can be partly dependent on reduced-intensity conditioning/reduced-toxicity conditioning regimens. This retrospective study aimed to compare the nonrelapse mortality, relapse incidence, progression-free survival, and overall survival rates between the fludarabine/melphalan/reduced-dose busulfan (Flu/Mel/Bu2; busulfan at a dose of 6.4 mg/kg intravenously) and fludarabine/melphalan/full-dose busulfan (Flu/Mel/Bu4; busulfan at a dose of 12.8 mg/kg intravenously) regimens in patients receiving umbilical cord blood transplantation.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>Eighty-seven adult patients who received the Flu/Mel/Bu2 (<em>n</em> = 45) or Flu/Mel/Bu4 (<em>n</em> = 42) regimen as a conditioning regimen before umbilical cord blood transplantation at our institution between January 2013 and December 2022 were included in this study.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>There were no significant differences in terms of clinical outcomes including nonrelapse mortality, relapse incidence, progression-free survival, and overall survival rates between the two regimens. Further, even in higher-risk patients classified according to the Refined Disease Risk Index, the Flu/Mel/Bu2 regimen was comparable to the Flu/Mel/Bu4 regimen.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The novel Flu/Mel/Bu2 regimen could be applied in clinical settings as it can be tolerated and effective in older patients.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":23246,"journal":{"name":"Transplantation proceedings","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fludarabine Melphalan, Reduced-dose Busulfan Versus Fludarabine, Melphalan, Full-dose Busulfan in Patients Receiving Cord Blood Transplantation\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.transproceed.2024.08.031\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Various reduced-intensity conditioning/reduced-toxicity conditioning regimens have been developed for patients receiving allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. The balance between disease relapse and toxicity can be partly dependent on reduced-intensity conditioning/reduced-toxicity conditioning regimens. This retrospective study aimed to compare the nonrelapse mortality, relapse incidence, progression-free survival, and overall survival rates between the fludarabine/melphalan/reduced-dose busulfan (Flu/Mel/Bu2; busulfan at a dose of 6.4 mg/kg intravenously) and fludarabine/melphalan/full-dose busulfan (Flu/Mel/Bu4; busulfan at a dose of 12.8 mg/kg intravenously) regimens in patients receiving umbilical cord blood transplantation.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>Eighty-seven adult patients who received the Flu/Mel/Bu2 (<em>n</em> = 45) or Flu/Mel/Bu4 (<em>n</em> = 42) regimen as a conditioning regimen before umbilical cord blood transplantation at our institution between January 2013 and December 2022 were included in this study.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>There were no significant differences in terms of clinical outcomes including nonrelapse mortality, relapse incidence, progression-free survival, and overall survival rates between the two regimens. Further, even in higher-risk patients classified according to the Refined Disease Risk Index, the Flu/Mel/Bu2 regimen was comparable to the Flu/Mel/Bu4 regimen.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The novel Flu/Mel/Bu2 regimen could be applied in clinical settings as it can be tolerated and effective in older patients.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23246,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transplantation proceedings\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transplantation proceedings\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0041134524004652\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplantation proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0041134524004652","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Fludarabine Melphalan, Reduced-dose Busulfan Versus Fludarabine, Melphalan, Full-dose Busulfan in Patients Receiving Cord Blood Transplantation
Background
Various reduced-intensity conditioning/reduced-toxicity conditioning regimens have been developed for patients receiving allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. The balance between disease relapse and toxicity can be partly dependent on reduced-intensity conditioning/reduced-toxicity conditioning regimens. This retrospective study aimed to compare the nonrelapse mortality, relapse incidence, progression-free survival, and overall survival rates between the fludarabine/melphalan/reduced-dose busulfan (Flu/Mel/Bu2; busulfan at a dose of 6.4 mg/kg intravenously) and fludarabine/melphalan/full-dose busulfan (Flu/Mel/Bu4; busulfan at a dose of 12.8 mg/kg intravenously) regimens in patients receiving umbilical cord blood transplantation.
Method
Eighty-seven adult patients who received the Flu/Mel/Bu2 (n = 45) or Flu/Mel/Bu4 (n = 42) regimen as a conditioning regimen before umbilical cord blood transplantation at our institution between January 2013 and December 2022 were included in this study.
Results
There were no significant differences in terms of clinical outcomes including nonrelapse mortality, relapse incidence, progression-free survival, and overall survival rates between the two regimens. Further, even in higher-risk patients classified according to the Refined Disease Risk Index, the Flu/Mel/Bu2 regimen was comparable to the Flu/Mel/Bu4 regimen.
Conclusion
The novel Flu/Mel/Bu2 regimen could be applied in clinical settings as it can be tolerated and effective in older patients.
期刊介绍：
Transplantation Proceedings publishes several different categories of manuscripts, all of which undergo extensive peer review by recognized authorities in the field prior to their acceptance for publication.
The first type of manuscripts consists of sets of papers providing an in-depth expression of the current state of the art in various rapidly developing components of world transplantation biology and medicine. These manuscripts emanate from congresses of the affiliated transplantation societies, from Symposia sponsored by the Societies, as well as special Conferences and Workshops covering related topics.
Transplantation Proceedings also publishes several special sections including publication of Clinical Transplantation Proceedings, being rapid original contributions of preclinical and clinical experiences. These manuscripts undergo review by members of the Editorial Board.
Original basic or clinical science articles, clinical trials and case studies can be submitted to the journal?s open access companion title Transplantation Reports.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
