调查横向车辆控制中视觉信息取样的情景动态--对剩余视觉能力的主观与客观估计

IF 3.5 2区 工程技术 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour Pub Date : 2024-09-04 DOI:10.1016/j.trf.2024.08.034
Hilkka Grahn , Tuomo Kujala , Toni Hautaoja , Dario D. Salvucci
{"title":"调查横向车辆控制中视觉信息取样的情景动态--对剩余视觉能力的主观与客观估计","authors":"Hilkka Grahn ,&nbsp;Tuomo Kujala ,&nbsp;Toni Hautaoja ,&nbsp;Dario D. Salvucci","doi":"10.1016/j.trf.2024.08.034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Drivers continually adapt their information sampling behavior to changing traffic conditions for safe driving. Scientists have studied this sampling behavior for decades; however, the literature on how drivers adapt their visual information sampling in response to observed driving dynamics is still incomplete, especially concerning what might be considered safe adaptation from an external perspective. While occlusion methods are commonly employed to study drivers’ visual information sampling, the variability in self-selected occlusion times and their relationship to actual driving performance has yet to be fully understood. In a driving simulator study with 30 participants, we analyzed and compared the situational dynamics influencing visual information sampling and performance in an occluded lane-keeping task. The findings underscore the significant influence of speed, lane position, time-to-line-crossing at the start of occlusion, and steering during occlusion on spare visual capacity in lane-keeping. Although the participants were able to make slight adjustments to their visual sampling based on these variables, their occlusion time choices appeared to be stable and primarily driven by individual preferences, unrelated to their driving experience or general lateral control instability under occlusion. In contrast, drivers’ general instability in lateral control under single-occlusion driving emerged as the strongest predictor of lane crossing during continuous, intermittently occluded driving. These insights contribute to the understanding of information sampling dynamics and spare visual capacity in lateral vehicle control, potentially guiding the development of personalized and contextually intelligent driver attention monitoring and warning systems.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48355,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour","volume":"107 ","pages":"Pages 98-114"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1369847824002419/pdfft?md5=25e886016aed5e8432bf634e18461e74&pid=1-s2.0-S1369847824002419-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investigating the situational dynamics of visual information sampling in lateral vehicle control – Subjective vs. objective estimates of spare visual capacity\",\"authors\":\"Hilkka Grahn ,&nbsp;Tuomo Kujala ,&nbsp;Toni Hautaoja ,&nbsp;Dario D. Salvucci\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.trf.2024.08.034\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Drivers continually adapt their information sampling behavior to changing traffic conditions for safe driving. Scientists have studied this sampling behavior for decades; however, the literature on how drivers adapt their visual information sampling in response to observed driving dynamics is still incomplete, especially concerning what might be considered safe adaptation from an external perspective. While occlusion methods are commonly employed to study drivers’ visual information sampling, the variability in self-selected occlusion times and their relationship to actual driving performance has yet to be fully understood. In a driving simulator study with 30 participants, we analyzed and compared the situational dynamics influencing visual information sampling and performance in an occluded lane-keeping task. The findings underscore the significant influence of speed, lane position, time-to-line-crossing at the start of occlusion, and steering during occlusion on spare visual capacity in lane-keeping. Although the participants were able to make slight adjustments to their visual sampling based on these variables, their occlusion time choices appeared to be stable and primarily driven by individual preferences, unrelated to their driving experience or general lateral control instability under occlusion. In contrast, drivers’ general instability in lateral control under single-occlusion driving emerged as the strongest predictor of lane crossing during continuous, intermittently occluded driving. These insights contribute to the understanding of information sampling dynamics and spare visual capacity in lateral vehicle control, potentially guiding the development of personalized and contextually intelligent driver attention monitoring and warning systems.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48355,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour\",\"volume\":\"107 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 98-114\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1369847824002419/pdfft?md5=25e886016aed5e8432bf634e18461e74&pid=1-s2.0-S1369847824002419-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1369847824002419\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1369847824002419","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了安全驾驶,驾驶员会根据不断变化的交通状况不断调整自己的信息取样行为。数十年来,科学家们一直在研究这种取样行为;然而,关于驾驶员如何根据观察到的驾驶动态调整视觉信息取样的文献仍不完整,尤其是关于从外部角度看什么才算安全调整的文献。虽然研究驾驶员视觉信息取样通常采用遮挡法,但自我选择遮挡时间的可变性及其与实际驾驶表现的关系仍有待充分了解。在一项有 30 名参与者参加的驾驶模拟器研究中,我们分析并比较了影响视觉信息取样和在闭塞车道保持任务中的表现的情景动态。研究结果表明,车速、车道位置、闭塞开始时的越线时间以及闭塞期间的转向对车道保持中的剩余视觉能力有重大影响。虽然参与者能够根据这些变量对其视觉采样进行轻微调整,但他们的闭塞时间选择似乎是稳定的,主要受个人偏好的驱动,与他们的驾驶经验或闭塞下的一般横向控制不稳定性无关。相比之下,驾驶员在单一闭塞驾驶下横向控制的一般不稳定性成为连续、间歇闭塞驾驶期间车道交叉的最强预测因素。这些见解有助于人们了解横向车辆控制中的信息采样动态和剩余视觉能力,从而有可能指导个性化和情境智能驾驶员注意力监测和预警系统的开发。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Investigating the situational dynamics of visual information sampling in lateral vehicle control – Subjective vs. objective estimates of spare visual capacity

Drivers continually adapt their information sampling behavior to changing traffic conditions for safe driving. Scientists have studied this sampling behavior for decades; however, the literature on how drivers adapt their visual information sampling in response to observed driving dynamics is still incomplete, especially concerning what might be considered safe adaptation from an external perspective. While occlusion methods are commonly employed to study drivers’ visual information sampling, the variability in self-selected occlusion times and their relationship to actual driving performance has yet to be fully understood. In a driving simulator study with 30 participants, we analyzed and compared the situational dynamics influencing visual information sampling and performance in an occluded lane-keeping task. The findings underscore the significant influence of speed, lane position, time-to-line-crossing at the start of occlusion, and steering during occlusion on spare visual capacity in lane-keeping. Although the participants were able to make slight adjustments to their visual sampling based on these variables, their occlusion time choices appeared to be stable and primarily driven by individual preferences, unrelated to their driving experience or general lateral control instability under occlusion. In contrast, drivers’ general instability in lateral control under single-occlusion driving emerged as the strongest predictor of lane crossing during continuous, intermittently occluded driving. These insights contribute to the understanding of information sampling dynamics and spare visual capacity in lateral vehicle control, potentially guiding the development of personalized and contextually intelligent driver attention monitoring and warning systems.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
14.60%
发文量
239
审稿时长
71 days
期刊介绍: Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour focuses on the behavioural and psychological aspects of traffic and transport. The aim of the journal is to enhance theory development, improve the quality of empirical studies and to stimulate the application of research findings in practice. TRF provides a focus and a means of communication for the considerable amount of research activities that are now being carried out in this field. The journal provides a forum for transportation researchers, psychologists, ergonomists, engineers and policy-makers with an interest in traffic and transport psychology.
期刊最新文献
Understanding car-sharing by integrating long-, medium- and short-term cognitions High-speed curve negotiation: Can differences in expertise account for the different effects of cognitive load? Description and analysis of aberrant riding behaviors of pedal cyclists, e-bike riders and motorcyclists: Based on a self-report questionnaire The role of emotional coherence in electric vehicle purchasing decisions Incorporating personality traits for the study of user acceptance of electric micromobility-sharing services
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1