SARS-CoV-2大流行对院内心脏骤停的影响:系统回顾和荟萃分析

IF 2.1 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Resuscitation plus Pub Date : 2024-09-04 DOI:10.1016/j.resplu.2024.100756
Alexa Fekete-Győr , Anna Seckington , Boldizsár Kiss , Bettina Nagy , Ádám Pál-Jakab , Dénes Zsolt Kiss , Péter Fehérvári , Endre Zima
{"title":"SARS-CoV-2大流行对院内心脏骤停的影响:系统回顾和荟萃分析","authors":"Alexa Fekete-Győr ,&nbsp;Anna Seckington ,&nbsp;Boldizsár Kiss ,&nbsp;Bettina Nagy ,&nbsp;Ádám Pál-Jakab ,&nbsp;Dénes Zsolt Kiss ,&nbsp;Péter Fehérvári ,&nbsp;Endre Zima","doi":"10.1016/j.resplu.2024.100756","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>There is an emerging concern regarding the indirect effect the Covid-19 pandemic has had on the care provided to patients. New resuscitation guidance including the donning of Personal Protective Equipment before commencing resuscitation efforts, the avoidance of bag-mask ventilation, limiting the number of responders and stopping resuscitation efforts earlier could have led to worse outcomes following in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) when compared to the non-pandemic period. The primary objective was to understand the impact of the pandemic on patient outcomes following IHCA by comparing the pandemic and non-pandemic periods.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Our systematic search was conducted on the 13th of September 2022 in three databases: Medline, Embase and Central. Randomised or non-randomised clinical trials and observational studies were included. The search was repeated on 31st December 2023 and there were no new studies appropriate for inclusion which had been published in the interim. The patient population consisted of adult patients who suffered IHCA due to any cause. The primary outcome was survival to hospital discharge (SHD). The secondary outcomes were return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) and length of resuscitation.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We identified 1873 studies, 9 were included in our qualitative analysis. SHD was reported in 8 studies with no difference between the two periods (OR 0.69; 95% CI 0.47–1.03) along with resuscitation (MD: 0.74; 95% CI: −0.67 to 2.14; <em>p</em> = 0.153. ROSC was included in all studies and showed significant difference between the two periods (OR 0.75; 95% 0.60–0.95)</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Although SHD was similar between the two periods, ROSC was significantly lower during the pandemic with longer resuscitation times highlighting a substantial impact of the pandemic on patient outcomes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":94192,"journal":{"name":"Resuscitation plus","volume":"20 ","pages":"Article 100756"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666520424002078/pdfft?md5=33805ba5ef131758fa134b6c9d2b8255&pid=1-s2.0-S2666520424002078-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The impact of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic on in-hospital cardiac arrest: A systematic review and meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Alexa Fekete-Győr ,&nbsp;Anna Seckington ,&nbsp;Boldizsár Kiss ,&nbsp;Bettina Nagy ,&nbsp;Ádám Pál-Jakab ,&nbsp;Dénes Zsolt Kiss ,&nbsp;Péter Fehérvári ,&nbsp;Endre Zima\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.resplu.2024.100756\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>There is an emerging concern regarding the indirect effect the Covid-19 pandemic has had on the care provided to patients. New resuscitation guidance including the donning of Personal Protective Equipment before commencing resuscitation efforts, the avoidance of bag-mask ventilation, limiting the number of responders and stopping resuscitation efforts earlier could have led to worse outcomes following in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) when compared to the non-pandemic period. The primary objective was to understand the impact of the pandemic on patient outcomes following IHCA by comparing the pandemic and non-pandemic periods.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Our systematic search was conducted on the 13th of September 2022 in three databases: Medline, Embase and Central. Randomised or non-randomised clinical trials and observational studies were included. The search was repeated on 31st December 2023 and there were no new studies appropriate for inclusion which had been published in the interim. The patient population consisted of adult patients who suffered IHCA due to any cause. The primary outcome was survival to hospital discharge (SHD). The secondary outcomes were return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) and length of resuscitation.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We identified 1873 studies, 9 were included in our qualitative analysis. SHD was reported in 8 studies with no difference between the two periods (OR 0.69; 95% CI 0.47–1.03) along with resuscitation (MD: 0.74; 95% CI: −0.67 to 2.14; <em>p</em> = 0.153. ROSC was included in all studies and showed significant difference between the two periods (OR 0.75; 95% 0.60–0.95)</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Although SHD was similar between the two periods, ROSC was significantly lower during the pandemic with longer resuscitation times highlighting a substantial impact of the pandemic on patient outcomes.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94192,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Resuscitation plus\",\"volume\":\"20 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100756\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666520424002078/pdfft?md5=33805ba5ef131758fa134b6c9d2b8255&pid=1-s2.0-S2666520424002078-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Resuscitation plus\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666520424002078\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resuscitation plus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666520424002078","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景人们开始关注 Covid-19 大流行对病人护理的间接影响。新的复苏指南包括在开始复苏工作前穿戴个人防护装备、避免使用面罩通气、限制急救人员数量和提前停止复苏工作等,与非大流行时期相比,这些指南可能会导致院内心脏骤停(IHCA)后的预后更差。我们的主要目的是通过比较大流行时期和非大流行时期,了解大流行对院内心脏骤停患者预后的影响:我们于 2022 年 9 月 13 日在三个数据库中进行了系统检索:Medline、Embase 和 Central。随机或非随机临床试验和观察性研究均包括在内。2023 年 12 月 31 日再次进行了检索,在此期间没有新的研究发表。患者群体包括因任何原因导致 IHCA 的成年患者。主要结果是出院生存率(SHD)。结果我们确定了 1873 项研究,其中 9 项纳入了我们的定性分析。8项研究报告了SHD和复苏时间(MD:0.74;95% CI:-0.67至2.14;P = 0.153),两个时间段之间没有差异(OR 0.69;95% CI 0.47-1.03)。结论虽然两个时期的 SHD 相似,但大流行期间的 ROSC 明显较低,复苏时间较长,这凸显了大流行对患者预后的重大影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The impact of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic on in-hospital cardiac arrest: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

There is an emerging concern regarding the indirect effect the Covid-19 pandemic has had on the care provided to patients. New resuscitation guidance including the donning of Personal Protective Equipment before commencing resuscitation efforts, the avoidance of bag-mask ventilation, limiting the number of responders and stopping resuscitation efforts earlier could have led to worse outcomes following in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) when compared to the non-pandemic period. The primary objective was to understand the impact of the pandemic on patient outcomes following IHCA by comparing the pandemic and non-pandemic periods.

Methods

Our systematic search was conducted on the 13th of September 2022 in three databases: Medline, Embase and Central. Randomised or non-randomised clinical trials and observational studies were included. The search was repeated on 31st December 2023 and there were no new studies appropriate for inclusion which had been published in the interim. The patient population consisted of adult patients who suffered IHCA due to any cause. The primary outcome was survival to hospital discharge (SHD). The secondary outcomes were return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) and length of resuscitation.

Results

We identified 1873 studies, 9 were included in our qualitative analysis. SHD was reported in 8 studies with no difference between the two periods (OR 0.69; 95% CI 0.47–1.03) along with resuscitation (MD: 0.74; 95% CI: −0.67 to 2.14; p = 0.153. ROSC was included in all studies and showed significant difference between the two periods (OR 0.75; 95% 0.60–0.95)

Conclusion

Although SHD was similar between the two periods, ROSC was significantly lower during the pandemic with longer resuscitation times highlighting a substantial impact of the pandemic on patient outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Resuscitation plus
Resuscitation plus Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
52 days
期刊最新文献
Cricothyroidotomy in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: An observational study Does delivering chest compressions to patients who are not in cardiac arrest cause unintentional injury? A systematic review Why physicians use sodium bicarbonate during cardiac arrest: A cross-sectional survey study of adult and pediatric clinicians Application of multi-feature-based machine learning models to predict neurological outcomes of cardiac arrest Associations of long-term hyperoxemia, survival, and neurological outcomes in extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation patients undergoing targeted temperature management: A retrospective observational analysis of the SAVE-J Ⅱ study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1