从学术与实践合作的角度,为护理本科生制定循证护理实践课程框架:德尔菲研究

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING Nurse Education in Practice Pub Date : 2024-09-02 DOI:10.1016/j.nepr.2024.104117
{"title":"从学术与实践合作的角度,为护理本科生制定循证护理实践课程框架:德尔菲研究","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.nepr.2024.104117","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aim</h3><p>To develop an evidence-based nursing practice course framework for undergraduate nursing students from a perspective of academic-practice partnerships.</p></div><div><h3>Background</h3><p>Academic-practice partnerships could play a crucial role in bridging theory-practice gap in evidence-based nursing education. However, there is a lack of evidence-based nursing practice course framework for undergraduate nursing students from a perspective of academic-practice partnerships.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>A Delphi study.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The Delphi study was conducted by literature analysis, qualitative interview and Delphi expert consultation to develop this course framework. 15 and 12 experts were involved in round one and round two of Delphi expert consultation, respectively. The consensus threshold of two-round Delphi expert consultation was described by expert's positive coefficient (≥ 50 %), positive coefficient (≥ 70 %), expert authority coefficient (≥ 0.7), coefficient of variation (&lt;0.25) and full score frequency (&gt;20 %).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The final course framework includes learning objectives (17 items); teaching chapters of theoretical classes (five items); teaching contents (30 items), methods (12 items) and class hours (9 items) of theoretical classes; and the responsibilities of academic teachers (11 items) and clinical teachers (11 items) in practical classes.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The course framework developed by this study could provide guidance for evidence-based nursing education of undergraduate nursing students. The effectiveness of this course framework should be verified through further experimental studies in the future.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48715,"journal":{"name":"Nurse Education in Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development of an evidence-based nursing practice course framework for undergraduate nursing students from a perspective of academic-practice partnerships: A Delphi study\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.nepr.2024.104117\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Aim</h3><p>To develop an evidence-based nursing practice course framework for undergraduate nursing students from a perspective of academic-practice partnerships.</p></div><div><h3>Background</h3><p>Academic-practice partnerships could play a crucial role in bridging theory-practice gap in evidence-based nursing education. However, there is a lack of evidence-based nursing practice course framework for undergraduate nursing students from a perspective of academic-practice partnerships.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>A Delphi study.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The Delphi study was conducted by literature analysis, qualitative interview and Delphi expert consultation to develop this course framework. 15 and 12 experts were involved in round one and round two of Delphi expert consultation, respectively. The consensus threshold of two-round Delphi expert consultation was described by expert's positive coefficient (≥ 50 %), positive coefficient (≥ 70 %), expert authority coefficient (≥ 0.7), coefficient of variation (&lt;0.25) and full score frequency (&gt;20 %).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The final course framework includes learning objectives (17 items); teaching chapters of theoretical classes (five items); teaching contents (30 items), methods (12 items) and class hours (9 items) of theoretical classes; and the responsibilities of academic teachers (11 items) and clinical teachers (11 items) in practical classes.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The course framework developed by this study could provide guidance for evidence-based nursing education of undergraduate nursing students. The effectiveness of this course framework should be verified through further experimental studies in the future.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48715,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nurse Education in Practice\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nurse Education in Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1471595324002464\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nurse Education in Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1471595324002464","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的从学术与实践合作的角度为护理本科生制定循证护理实践课程框架。背景在循证护理教育中,学术与实践合作在弥合理论与实践差距方面发挥着重要作用。方法德尔菲研究通过文献分析、定性访谈和德尔菲专家咨询来制定本课程框架。分别有 15 位和 12 位专家参与了第一轮和第二轮德尔菲专家咨询。两轮德尔菲专家咨询的共识阈值用专家正系数(≥ 50 %)、正系数(≥ 70 %)、专家权威系数(≥ 0.7)、变异系数(<0.25)和满分频率(>20 %)来描述。结果最终课程框架包括学习目标(17 项);理论课教学章节(5 项);理论课教学内容(30 项)、方法(12 项)、课时(9 项);实践课教学教师职责(11 项)、临床教师职责(11 项)。该课程框架的有效性有待今后进一步的实验研究来验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Development of an evidence-based nursing practice course framework for undergraduate nursing students from a perspective of academic-practice partnerships: A Delphi study

Aim

To develop an evidence-based nursing practice course framework for undergraduate nursing students from a perspective of academic-practice partnerships.

Background

Academic-practice partnerships could play a crucial role in bridging theory-practice gap in evidence-based nursing education. However, there is a lack of evidence-based nursing practice course framework for undergraduate nursing students from a perspective of academic-practice partnerships.

Design

A Delphi study.

Methods

The Delphi study was conducted by literature analysis, qualitative interview and Delphi expert consultation to develop this course framework. 15 and 12 experts were involved in round one and round two of Delphi expert consultation, respectively. The consensus threshold of two-round Delphi expert consultation was described by expert's positive coefficient (≥ 50 %), positive coefficient (≥ 70 %), expert authority coefficient (≥ 0.7), coefficient of variation (<0.25) and full score frequency (>20 %).

Results

The final course framework includes learning objectives (17 items); teaching chapters of theoretical classes (five items); teaching contents (30 items), methods (12 items) and class hours (9 items) of theoretical classes; and the responsibilities of academic teachers (11 items) and clinical teachers (11 items) in practical classes.

Conclusion

The course framework developed by this study could provide guidance for evidence-based nursing education of undergraduate nursing students. The effectiveness of this course framework should be verified through further experimental studies in the future.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
9.40%
发文量
180
审稿时长
51 days
期刊介绍: Nurse Education in Practice enables lecturers and practitioners to both share and disseminate evidence that demonstrates the actual practice of education as it is experienced in the realities of their respective work environments. It is supportive of new authors and will be at the forefront in publishing individual and collaborative papers that demonstrate the link between education and practice.
期刊最新文献
“Removing the home court advantage”: A qualitative evaluation of LEGO® as an interprofessional simulation icebreaker for midwifery and medical students Does being involved in a research project enhance the postgraduate taught student experience: A qualitative research case study Investigating clinical decision-making in bleeding complications among nursing students: A longitudinal mixed-methods study Simulation as a method in a supervision course, experiences of midwives and specialist nurses: A qualitative study Characteristics of nursing educators' professional competency standards: A scoping review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1