委托代理信任与数字金融服务的采用:来自印度的证据

IF 0.8 Q3 ECONOMICS Economic Notes Pub Date : 2024-09-03 DOI:10.1111/ecno.12247
Rajat S. Yadav, Siva R. Kalluru
{"title":"委托代理信任与数字金融服务的采用:来自印度的证据","authors":"Rajat S. Yadav,&nbsp;Siva R. Kalluru","doi":"10.1111/ecno.12247","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The high reliance on cash is a lifestyle for many people, and their low proficiency with smartphone usage acts as an inertial barrier to using digital financial services (DFS). Given low financial or digital literacy, online banking transactions have to be promoted and mediated by DFS agents. This study examines the role of digital platforms, intermediaries such as banks, mobile money agents, payment banks, post offices, and the government's increasing use of digital technologies. This usage of digital platforms is based on the trust relationship between the principals, who are owners of their bank accounts, and agents of DFS, who are intermediaries. A linear probabilistic model is employed to determine the determinants behind the low adoption of DFS between the necessity and nonnecessity groups. We observe that demand-side factors like education level, identity proof (documentation), and level of smartphone use proficiency increase the probability of a principal's involvement in a digital mode of payment. At the same time, supply-side factors like digital infrastructure and trust deficit due to unviable commission incentives to DFS agents decrease the principal's likelihood of using digital platforms.</p>","PeriodicalId":44298,"journal":{"name":"Economic Notes","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Principal–agent trust and adoption of digital financial services: Evidence from India\",\"authors\":\"Rajat S. Yadav,&nbsp;Siva R. Kalluru\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ecno.12247\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The high reliance on cash is a lifestyle for many people, and their low proficiency with smartphone usage acts as an inertial barrier to using digital financial services (DFS). Given low financial or digital literacy, online banking transactions have to be promoted and mediated by DFS agents. This study examines the role of digital platforms, intermediaries such as banks, mobile money agents, payment banks, post offices, and the government's increasing use of digital technologies. This usage of digital platforms is based on the trust relationship between the principals, who are owners of their bank accounts, and agents of DFS, who are intermediaries. A linear probabilistic model is employed to determine the determinants behind the low adoption of DFS between the necessity and nonnecessity groups. We observe that demand-side factors like education level, identity proof (documentation), and level of smartphone use proficiency increase the probability of a principal's involvement in a digital mode of payment. At the same time, supply-side factors like digital infrastructure and trust deficit due to unviable commission incentives to DFS agents decrease the principal's likelihood of using digital platforms.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44298,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Economic Notes\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Economic Notes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ecno.12247\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economic Notes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ecno.12247","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

高度依赖现金是许多人的生活方式,而他们对智能手机使用的低熟练度成为使用数字金融服务(DFS)的惯性障碍。由于金融或数字知识水平较低,网上银行交易必须由数字金融服务代理机构进行推广和中介。本研究探讨了数字平台、银行、移动支付代理机构、支付银行、邮局等中介机构的作用,以及政府对数字技术日益广泛的使用。数字平台的使用基于委托人(银行账户所有者)和 DFS 代理(中介)之间的信任关系。我们采用了线性概率模型来确定必要性群体和非必要性群体之间较少采用 DFS 的决定因素。我们发现,教育水平、身份证明(文件)和智能手机使用熟练程度等需求方因素会增加委托人参与数字支付模式的概率。与此同时,数字基础设施等供应方因素,以及由于对 DFS 代理的佣金奖励不可行而导致的信任缺失,则会降低委托人使用数字平台的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Principal–agent trust and adoption of digital financial services: Evidence from India

The high reliance on cash is a lifestyle for many people, and their low proficiency with smartphone usage acts as an inertial barrier to using digital financial services (DFS). Given low financial or digital literacy, online banking transactions have to be promoted and mediated by DFS agents. This study examines the role of digital platforms, intermediaries such as banks, mobile money agents, payment banks, post offices, and the government's increasing use of digital technologies. This usage of digital platforms is based on the trust relationship between the principals, who are owners of their bank accounts, and agents of DFS, who are intermediaries. A linear probabilistic model is employed to determine the determinants behind the low adoption of DFS between the necessity and nonnecessity groups. We observe that demand-side factors like education level, identity proof (documentation), and level of smartphone use proficiency increase the probability of a principal's involvement in a digital mode of payment. At the same time, supply-side factors like digital infrastructure and trust deficit due to unviable commission incentives to DFS agents decrease the principal's likelihood of using digital platforms.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Economic Notes
Economic Notes ECONOMICS-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
6.70%
发文量
11
期刊介绍: With articles that deal with the latest issues in banking, finance and monetary economics internationally, Economic Notes is an essential resource for anyone in the industry, helping you keep abreast of the latest developments in the field. Articles are written by top economists and executives working in financial institutions, firms and the public sector.
期刊最新文献
Financial inclusion, financial stability, and poverty reduction in Africa Will the real carbon pricing please stand up? On the connectedness of stock returns and exchange rates in emerging and frontier markets in Africa Impact of UK's social stock exchange trading scheme on the performance of social enterprises Are Indian markets insulated from the impact of cryptocurrencies? Unveiling the volatility linkages through multi-index dynamic multivariate GARCH analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1