用于检测颅内高压的深度学习方法的衍生、外部和临床验证

IF 12.4 1区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES NPJ Digital Medicine Pub Date : 2024-09-05 DOI:10.1038/s41746-024-01227-0
Faris Gulamali, Pushkala Jayaraman, Ashwin S. Sawant, Jacob Desman, Benjamin Fox, Annette Chang, Brian Y. Soong, Naveen Arivazagan, Alexandra S. Reynolds, Son Q. Duong, Akhil Vaid, Patricia Kovatch, Robert Freeman, Ira S. Hofer, Ankit Sakhuja, Neha S. Dangayach, David S. Reich, Alexander W. Charney, Girish N. Nadkarni
{"title":"用于检测颅内高压的深度学习方法的衍生、外部和临床验证","authors":"Faris Gulamali, Pushkala Jayaraman, Ashwin S. Sawant, Jacob Desman, Benjamin Fox, Annette Chang, Brian Y. Soong, Naveen Arivazagan, Alexandra S. Reynolds, Son Q. Duong, Akhil Vaid, Patricia Kovatch, Robert Freeman, Ira S. Hofer, Ankit Sakhuja, Neha S. Dangayach, David S. Reich, Alexander W. Charney, Girish N. Nadkarni","doi":"10.1038/s41746-024-01227-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Increased intracranial pressure (ICP) ≥15 mmHg is associated with adverse neurological outcomes, but needs invasive intracranial monitoring. Using the publicly available MIMIC-III Waveform Database (2000–2013) from Boston, we developed an artificial intelligence-derived biomarker for elevated ICP (aICP) for adult patients. aICP uses routinely collected extracranial waveform data as input, reducing the need for invasive monitoring. We externally validated aICP with an independent dataset from the Mount Sinai Hospital (2020–2022) in New York City. The AUROC, accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity on the external validation dataset were 0.80 (95% CI, 0.80–0.80), 73.8% (95% CI, 72.0–75.6%), 73.5% (95% CI 72.5–74.5%), and 73.0% (95% CI, 72.0–74.0%), respectively. We also present an exploratory analysis showing aICP predictions are associated with clinical phenotypes. A ten-percentile increment was associated with brain malignancy (OR = 1.68; 95% CI, 1.09-2.60), intracerebral hemorrhage (OR = 1.18; 95% CI, 1.07–1.32), and craniotomy (OR = 1.43; 95% CI, 1.12–1.84; P < 0.05 for all).","PeriodicalId":19349,"journal":{"name":"NPJ Digital Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":12.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41746-024-01227-0.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Derivation, external and clinical validation of a deep learning approach for detecting intracranial hypertension\",\"authors\":\"Faris Gulamali, Pushkala Jayaraman, Ashwin S. Sawant, Jacob Desman, Benjamin Fox, Annette Chang, Brian Y. Soong, Naveen Arivazagan, Alexandra S. Reynolds, Son Q. Duong, Akhil Vaid, Patricia Kovatch, Robert Freeman, Ira S. Hofer, Ankit Sakhuja, Neha S. Dangayach, David S. Reich, Alexander W. Charney, Girish N. Nadkarni\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41746-024-01227-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Increased intracranial pressure (ICP) ≥15 mmHg is associated with adverse neurological outcomes, but needs invasive intracranial monitoring. Using the publicly available MIMIC-III Waveform Database (2000–2013) from Boston, we developed an artificial intelligence-derived biomarker for elevated ICP (aICP) for adult patients. aICP uses routinely collected extracranial waveform data as input, reducing the need for invasive monitoring. We externally validated aICP with an independent dataset from the Mount Sinai Hospital (2020–2022) in New York City. The AUROC, accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity on the external validation dataset were 0.80 (95% CI, 0.80–0.80), 73.8% (95% CI, 72.0–75.6%), 73.5% (95% CI 72.5–74.5%), and 73.0% (95% CI, 72.0–74.0%), respectively. We also present an exploratory analysis showing aICP predictions are associated with clinical phenotypes. A ten-percentile increment was associated with brain malignancy (OR = 1.68; 95% CI, 1.09-2.60), intracerebral hemorrhage (OR = 1.18; 95% CI, 1.07–1.32), and craniotomy (OR = 1.43; 95% CI, 1.12–1.84; P < 0.05 for all).\",\"PeriodicalId\":19349,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"NPJ Digital Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":12.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41746-024-01227-0.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"NPJ Digital Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41746-024-01227-0\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NPJ Digital Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41746-024-01227-0","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

颅内压(ICP)升高≥15 mmHg 与不良的神经系统预后有关,但需要进行有创颅内监测。利用波士顿公开的 MIMIC-III 波形数据库(2000-2013 年),我们为成年患者开发了一种人工智能衍生的 ICP 升高生物标志物(aICP)。我们利用纽约市西奈山医院(2020-2022 年)的独立数据集对 aICP 进行了外部验证。外部验证数据集的 AUROC、准确性、灵敏度和特异性分别为 0.80(95% CI,0.80-0.80)、73.8%(95% CI,72.0-75.6%)、73.5%(95% CI,72.5-74.5%)和 73.0%(95% CI,72.0-74.0%)。我们还进行了一项探索性分析,结果显示 aICP 预测与临床表型有关。10个百分点的增量与脑恶性肿瘤(OR = 1.68; 95% CI, 1.09-2.60)、脑内出血(OR = 1.18; 95% CI, 1.07-1.32)和开颅手术(OR = 1.43; 95% CI, 1.12-1.84;所有P均为0.05)相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Derivation, external and clinical validation of a deep learning approach for detecting intracranial hypertension
Increased intracranial pressure (ICP) ≥15 mmHg is associated with adverse neurological outcomes, but needs invasive intracranial monitoring. Using the publicly available MIMIC-III Waveform Database (2000–2013) from Boston, we developed an artificial intelligence-derived biomarker for elevated ICP (aICP) for adult patients. aICP uses routinely collected extracranial waveform data as input, reducing the need for invasive monitoring. We externally validated aICP with an independent dataset from the Mount Sinai Hospital (2020–2022) in New York City. The AUROC, accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity on the external validation dataset were 0.80 (95% CI, 0.80–0.80), 73.8% (95% CI, 72.0–75.6%), 73.5% (95% CI 72.5–74.5%), and 73.0% (95% CI, 72.0–74.0%), respectively. We also present an exploratory analysis showing aICP predictions are associated with clinical phenotypes. A ten-percentile increment was associated with brain malignancy (OR = 1.68; 95% CI, 1.09-2.60), intracerebral hemorrhage (OR = 1.18; 95% CI, 1.07–1.32), and craniotomy (OR = 1.43; 95% CI, 1.12–1.84; P < 0.05 for all).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
25.10
自引率
3.30%
发文量
170
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: npj Digital Medicine is an online open-access journal that focuses on publishing peer-reviewed research in the field of digital medicine. The journal covers various aspects of digital medicine, including the application and implementation of digital and mobile technologies in clinical settings, virtual healthcare, and the use of artificial intelligence and informatics. The primary goal of the journal is to support innovation and the advancement of healthcare through the integration of new digital and mobile technologies. When determining if a manuscript is suitable for publication, the journal considers four important criteria: novelty, clinical relevance, scientific rigor, and digital innovation.
期刊最新文献
Zero shot health trajectory prediction using transformer Regulatory responses and approval status of artificial intelligence medical devices with a focus on China A systematic review and meta analysis on digital mental health interventions in inpatient settings A drug mix and dose decision algorithm for individualized type 2 diabetes management Deep behavioural representation learning reveals risk profiles for malignant ventricular arrhythmias
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1