利用器官护理系统延长脑死亡捐献者心脏保存期的单中心经验。

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q3 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL Artificial organs Pub Date : 2024-09-06 DOI:10.1111/aor.14855
Vasiliki Gregory, Ameesh Isath, Gregg M Lanier, Avi Levine, Stephen Pan, Chhaya Aggarwal-Gupta, Guy Elgar, Junichi Shimamura, Kevin Wolfe, Alan Gass, David Spielvogel, Masashi Kai, Suguru Ohira
{"title":"利用器官护理系统延长脑死亡捐献者心脏保存期的单中心经验。","authors":"Vasiliki Gregory, Ameesh Isath, Gregg M Lanier, Avi Levine, Stephen Pan, Chhaya Aggarwal-Gupta, Guy Elgar, Junichi Shimamura, Kevin Wolfe, Alan Gass, David Spielvogel, Masashi Kai, Suguru Ohira","doi":"10.1111/aor.14855","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Organ Care System (OCS) (Transmedics, Andover, MA) reduces cold ischemic time of donor hearts by producing a normothermic beating state during ex vivo perfusion, enabling extended ex situ intervals, which potentially increases donor pool. We aimed to compare outcomes in utilization of OCS and conventional cold storage technique.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Consecutive heart transplants following brain death at our institution between May 2022 and July 2023 were analyzed. Recipients were divided into those receiving hearts preserved with OCS [N = 15] and those with conventional cold storage (Control, N = 27), with OCS utilization when anticipated ischemic time was more than 4 h. Pre-transplant characteristics and transplant outcomes were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>OCS utilization allowed a significant increase in distance traveled for heart retrieval (OCS, 624 ± 269 vs. Control, 153 ± 128 miles, p < 0.001), with longer mean total preservation times (6.2 ± 1.1 vs 2.6 ± 0.6 h, p < 0.001). All but one patient displayed a general decrease or plateau in lactate throughout perfusion time by OCS. Both groups experienced similar rates of severe primary graft dysfunction (OCS, 6.7% [N = 1] vs. Control, 11.1% [N = 3], p = 0.63), with 100% in-hospital survival in the OCS group compared to 96.3% in the Control group (p = 0.34). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that estimated one-year survival were comparable (OCS, 93.3 ± 6.4% vs. Control, 88.9 ± 6.0%, p = 0.61).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>With a mean preservation time of around 6 h and distance covered of over 600 miles, our results using OCS indicate a potential to safely increase the quantity and viability of accessible organs, thus broadening the donor pool without negatively affecting outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":8450,"journal":{"name":"Artificial organs","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Single-center experience of extended brain-death donor heart preservation with the organ care system.\",\"authors\":\"Vasiliki Gregory, Ameesh Isath, Gregg M Lanier, Avi Levine, Stephen Pan, Chhaya Aggarwal-Gupta, Guy Elgar, Junichi Shimamura, Kevin Wolfe, Alan Gass, David Spielvogel, Masashi Kai, Suguru Ohira\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/aor.14855\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Organ Care System (OCS) (Transmedics, Andover, MA) reduces cold ischemic time of donor hearts by producing a normothermic beating state during ex vivo perfusion, enabling extended ex situ intervals, which potentially increases donor pool. We aimed to compare outcomes in utilization of OCS and conventional cold storage technique.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Consecutive heart transplants following brain death at our institution between May 2022 and July 2023 were analyzed. Recipients were divided into those receiving hearts preserved with OCS [N = 15] and those with conventional cold storage (Control, N = 27), with OCS utilization when anticipated ischemic time was more than 4 h. Pre-transplant characteristics and transplant outcomes were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>OCS utilization allowed a significant increase in distance traveled for heart retrieval (OCS, 624 ± 269 vs. Control, 153 ± 128 miles, p < 0.001), with longer mean total preservation times (6.2 ± 1.1 vs 2.6 ± 0.6 h, p < 0.001). All but one patient displayed a general decrease or plateau in lactate throughout perfusion time by OCS. Both groups experienced similar rates of severe primary graft dysfunction (OCS, 6.7% [N = 1] vs. Control, 11.1% [N = 3], p = 0.63), with 100% in-hospital survival in the OCS group compared to 96.3% in the Control group (p = 0.34). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that estimated one-year survival were comparable (OCS, 93.3 ± 6.4% vs. Control, 88.9 ± 6.0%, p = 0.61).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>With a mean preservation time of around 6 h and distance covered of over 600 miles, our results using OCS indicate a potential to safely increase the quantity and viability of accessible organs, thus broadening the donor pool without negatively affecting outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8450,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Artificial organs\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Artificial organs\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/aor.14855\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Artificial organs","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/aor.14855","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:器官护理系统(OCS)(Transmedics,马萨诸塞州安多弗)通过在体外灌注过程中产生常温跳动状态来缩短供体心脏的低温缺血时间,从而延长体外间隔时间,这有可能增加供体库。我们的目的是比较使用 OCS 和传统冷藏技术的结果:分析了 2022 年 5 月至 2023 年 7 月期间在我院进行的脑死亡后连续心脏移植手术。受者分为接受 OCS 保存心脏的受者[N = 15]和接受传统冷藏保存心脏的受者(对照组,N = 27):结果:使用OCS后,取回心脏的距离明显增加(OCS为624±269英里,而对照组为153±128英里,p 结论:OCS的平均保存时间约为4小时,而对照组的平均保存时间约为4小时:平均保存时间约为 6 小时,距离超过 600 英里,我们使用 OCS 的结果表明,有可能安全地增加可获取器官的数量和存活率,从而扩大捐献者库,而不会对结果产生负面影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Single-center experience of extended brain-death donor heart preservation with the organ care system.

Background: The Organ Care System (OCS) (Transmedics, Andover, MA) reduces cold ischemic time of donor hearts by producing a normothermic beating state during ex vivo perfusion, enabling extended ex situ intervals, which potentially increases donor pool. We aimed to compare outcomes in utilization of OCS and conventional cold storage technique.

Methods: Consecutive heart transplants following brain death at our institution between May 2022 and July 2023 were analyzed. Recipients were divided into those receiving hearts preserved with OCS [N = 15] and those with conventional cold storage (Control, N = 27), with OCS utilization when anticipated ischemic time was more than 4 h. Pre-transplant characteristics and transplant outcomes were compared.

Results: OCS utilization allowed a significant increase in distance traveled for heart retrieval (OCS, 624 ± 269 vs. Control, 153 ± 128 miles, p < 0.001), with longer mean total preservation times (6.2 ± 1.1 vs 2.6 ± 0.6 h, p < 0.001). All but one patient displayed a general decrease or plateau in lactate throughout perfusion time by OCS. Both groups experienced similar rates of severe primary graft dysfunction (OCS, 6.7% [N = 1] vs. Control, 11.1% [N = 3], p = 0.63), with 100% in-hospital survival in the OCS group compared to 96.3% in the Control group (p = 0.34). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that estimated one-year survival were comparable (OCS, 93.3 ± 6.4% vs. Control, 88.9 ± 6.0%, p = 0.61).

Conclusion: With a mean preservation time of around 6 h and distance covered of over 600 miles, our results using OCS indicate a potential to safely increase the quantity and viability of accessible organs, thus broadening the donor pool without negatively affecting outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Artificial organs
Artificial organs 工程技术-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
303
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Artificial Organs is the official peer reviewed journal of The International Federation for Artificial Organs (Members of the Federation are: The American Society for Artificial Internal Organs, The European Society for Artificial Organs, and The Japanese Society for Artificial Organs), The International Faculty for Artificial Organs, the International Society for Rotary Blood Pumps, The International Society for Pediatric Mechanical Cardiopulmonary Support, and the Vienna International Workshop on Functional Electrical Stimulation. Artificial Organs publishes original research articles dealing with developments in artificial organs applications and treatment modalities and their clinical applications worldwide. Membership in the Societies listed above is not a prerequisite for publication. Articles are published without charge to the author except for color figures and excess page charges as noted.
期刊最新文献
Improving the hemocompatibility of centrifugal mechanical circulatory support devices at low flow rates. Early left ventricular unloading during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in cardiogenic shock: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Safety and efficacy of surgical revascularization with percutaneous ventricular assist device for acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: Japanese national registry study. Evaluation of extra-corporeal membrane oxygenator cannulae in pulsatile and non-pulsatile pediatric mock circuits. Stimulation of the withdrawal reflex in gait training after stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1