在肯尼亚农村地区开展亲身参与与远程(移动医疗)干预的对比:群组随机对照试验。

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH BMC Public Health Pub Date : 2024-09-05 DOI:10.1186/s12889-024-19828-5
Italo Lopez Garcia, Jill Luoto, Frances Aboud, Pamela Jervis, Teresa Mwoma, Edith Alu, Aloyce Odhiambo
{"title":"在肯尼亚农村地区开展亲身参与与远程(移动医疗)干预的对比:群组随机对照试验。","authors":"Italo Lopez Garcia, Jill Luoto, Frances Aboud, Pamela Jervis, Teresa Mwoma, Edith Alu, Aloyce Odhiambo","doi":"10.1186/s12889-024-19828-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>An estimated 43% of children under age 5 in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) experience compromised development due to poverty, poor nutrition, and inadequate psychosocial stimulation. Numerous early childhood development (ECD) parenting interventions have been shown to be effective at improving ECD outcomes, at least in the short-term, but they are (a) still too expensive to implement at scale in low-resource and rural settings, and (b) their early impacts tend to fade over time. New approaches to deliver effective ECD parenting interventions that are low-cost, scalable, and sustainable are sorely needed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Our study will experimentally test a traditional in-person group-based delivery model for an evidence-based ECD parenting intervention against a hybrid-delivery model that increasingly substitutes in-person meetings with remote (mHealth) delivery via smartphones, featuring audiovisual content and WhatsApp social interactions and learning. We will assess the relative effectiveness and cost of this hybrid-delivery model compared to in-person delivery and will extend the interventions over two years to increase their ability to sustain changes in parenting behaviors and ECD outcomes longer-term. Our evaluation design is a cluster Randomized Controlled Trial (cRCT) across 90 villages and approximately 1200 households. Midline and endline surveys collected 12 and 24 months after the start of the interventions, respectively, will examine short- and sustained two-year intention-to-treat impacts on primary outcomes. We will also examine the mediating pathways using mediation analysis. We hypothesize that a hybrid-delivery ECD intervention will be lower in cost, but remote interactions among participants may be an inferior substitute for in-person visits, leaving open the question of the most cost-effective program.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Our goal is to determine the best model to maximize the intervention's reach and sustained impacts to improve child outcomes. By integrating delivery into the ongoing operations of local Community Health Promoters (CHPs) within Kenya's rural health care system, and utilizing new low-cost technology, our project has the potential to make important contributions towards discovering potentially scalable, sustainable solutions for resource-limited settings.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>NCT06140017 (02/08/2024) AEARCTR0012704.</p>","PeriodicalId":9039,"journal":{"name":"BMC Public Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11375875/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"In-person versus remote (mHealth) delivery for a responsive parenting intervention in rural Kenya: a cluster randomized controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Italo Lopez Garcia, Jill Luoto, Frances Aboud, Pamela Jervis, Teresa Mwoma, Edith Alu, Aloyce Odhiambo\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12889-024-19828-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>An estimated 43% of children under age 5 in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) experience compromised development due to poverty, poor nutrition, and inadequate psychosocial stimulation. Numerous early childhood development (ECD) parenting interventions have been shown to be effective at improving ECD outcomes, at least in the short-term, but they are (a) still too expensive to implement at scale in low-resource and rural settings, and (b) their early impacts tend to fade over time. New approaches to deliver effective ECD parenting interventions that are low-cost, scalable, and sustainable are sorely needed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Our study will experimentally test a traditional in-person group-based delivery model for an evidence-based ECD parenting intervention against a hybrid-delivery model that increasingly substitutes in-person meetings with remote (mHealth) delivery via smartphones, featuring audiovisual content and WhatsApp social interactions and learning. We will assess the relative effectiveness and cost of this hybrid-delivery model compared to in-person delivery and will extend the interventions over two years to increase their ability to sustain changes in parenting behaviors and ECD outcomes longer-term. Our evaluation design is a cluster Randomized Controlled Trial (cRCT) across 90 villages and approximately 1200 households. Midline and endline surveys collected 12 and 24 months after the start of the interventions, respectively, will examine short- and sustained two-year intention-to-treat impacts on primary outcomes. We will also examine the mediating pathways using mediation analysis. We hypothesize that a hybrid-delivery ECD intervention will be lower in cost, but remote interactions among participants may be an inferior substitute for in-person visits, leaving open the question of the most cost-effective program.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Our goal is to determine the best model to maximize the intervention's reach and sustained impacts to improve child outcomes. By integrating delivery into the ongoing operations of local Community Health Promoters (CHPs) within Kenya's rural health care system, and utilizing new low-cost technology, our project has the potential to make important contributions towards discovering potentially scalable, sustainable solutions for resource-limited settings.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>NCT06140017 (02/08/2024) AEARCTR0012704.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9039,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Public Health\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11375875/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Public Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-19828-5\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-19828-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs),估计有 43% 的 5 岁以下儿童因贫困、营养不良和社会心理刺激不足而发育受到影响。许多儿童早期发展(ECD)养育干预措施已被证明能有效改善儿童早期发展的结果,至少在短期内是如此,但这些措施(a)仍然过于昂贵,无法在资源匮乏和农村环境中大规模实施,(b)其早期影响往往会随着时间的推移而逐渐消失。我们亟需新的方法来提供低成本、可扩展和可持续的有效幼儿发展育儿干预措施:方法:我们的研究将对基于证据的幼儿发展育儿干预的传统面对面小组授课模式与混合授课模式进行实验性测试,后者越来越多地通过智能手机远程(移动医疗)授课来取代面对面会议,其特点是提供视听内容和 WhatsApp 社交互动和学习。我们将评估这种混合交付模式与面对面交付模式相比的相对效果和成本,并将把干预措施延长两年,以提高其长期维持育儿行为变化和幼儿发展成果的能力。我们的评估设计是一项分组随机对照试验(cRCT),涉及 90 个村庄和大约 1200 个家庭。分别在干预开始 12 个月和 24 个月后进行的中线和末线调查将检验意向治疗对主要结果的短期和持续两年的影响。我们还将利用中介分析来研究中介途径。我们假设,混合交付式幼儿发展干预的成本较低,但参与者之间的远程互动可能无法替代面对面的访问,这就为最具成本效益的项目留下了悬念:讨论:我们的目标是确定最佳模式,以最大限度地扩大干预范围和持续影响,从而改善儿童的成果。通过在肯尼亚农村医疗保健系统中将提供服务纳入当地社区健康促进者(CHPs)的日常运作,并利用新的低成本技术,我们的项目有可能为发现资源有限环境中潜在的可扩展、可持续的解决方案做出重要贡献:NCT06140017 (02/08/2024) Aearctr0012704.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
In-person versus remote (mHealth) delivery for a responsive parenting intervention in rural Kenya: a cluster randomized controlled trial.

Background: An estimated 43% of children under age 5 in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) experience compromised development due to poverty, poor nutrition, and inadequate psychosocial stimulation. Numerous early childhood development (ECD) parenting interventions have been shown to be effective at improving ECD outcomes, at least in the short-term, but they are (a) still too expensive to implement at scale in low-resource and rural settings, and (b) their early impacts tend to fade over time. New approaches to deliver effective ECD parenting interventions that are low-cost, scalable, and sustainable are sorely needed.

Methods: Our study will experimentally test a traditional in-person group-based delivery model for an evidence-based ECD parenting intervention against a hybrid-delivery model that increasingly substitutes in-person meetings with remote (mHealth) delivery via smartphones, featuring audiovisual content and WhatsApp social interactions and learning. We will assess the relative effectiveness and cost of this hybrid-delivery model compared to in-person delivery and will extend the interventions over two years to increase their ability to sustain changes in parenting behaviors and ECD outcomes longer-term. Our evaluation design is a cluster Randomized Controlled Trial (cRCT) across 90 villages and approximately 1200 households. Midline and endline surveys collected 12 and 24 months after the start of the interventions, respectively, will examine short- and sustained two-year intention-to-treat impacts on primary outcomes. We will also examine the mediating pathways using mediation analysis. We hypothesize that a hybrid-delivery ECD intervention will be lower in cost, but remote interactions among participants may be an inferior substitute for in-person visits, leaving open the question of the most cost-effective program.

Discussion: Our goal is to determine the best model to maximize the intervention's reach and sustained impacts to improve child outcomes. By integrating delivery into the ongoing operations of local Community Health Promoters (CHPs) within Kenya's rural health care system, and utilizing new low-cost technology, our project has the potential to make important contributions towards discovering potentially scalable, sustainable solutions for resource-limited settings.

Trial registration: NCT06140017 (02/08/2024) AEARCTR0012704.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Public Health
BMC Public Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
4.40%
发文量
2108
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: BMC Public Health is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on the epidemiology of disease and the understanding of all aspects of public health. The journal has a special focus on the social determinants of health, the environmental, behavioral, and occupational correlates of health and disease, and the impact of health policies, practices and interventions on the community.
期刊最新文献
Association between total body muscle-fat ratio and risk of thyroid disorders: a cross-sectional study The association between mental status, personality traits, and discrepancy in social isolation and perceived loneliness among community dwellers Prevalence of undiagnosed hypertension and associated factors in Ndera sector, Gasabo district of Rwanda: a cross-sectional study Housing instability patterns among low-income, urban Black young adults in California and associations with mental health outcomes: baseline data from a randomized waitlist-controlled trial Level of hesitation of parents about childhood vaccines and affecting factors: a cross-sectional study in Turkey
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1