{"title":"肾素-血管紧张素-醛固酮系统抑制剂对患有冠状动脉瘤的川崎病患者的消退作用:一项前瞻性观察研究。","authors":"Eisuke Suganuma, Masaru Miura, Yutaro Koyama, Tohru Kobayashi, Tetsuji Kaneko, Tatsunori Hokosaki, Fujito Numano, Kenji Furuno, Junko Shiono, Shigeto Fuse, Ryuji Fukazawa, Yoshihide Mitani","doi":"10.1007/s00431-024-05765-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study is to investigate whether angiotensin type 1 receptor blockers (ARBs) or angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEis) can regress coronary artery aneurysm (CAA) in patients with Kawasaki disease (KD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multicenter, prospective, observational study was conducted at 53 institutions throughout Japan. We enrolled patients who were diagnosed with KD after January 2015 and had a medium or large CAA (maximum luminal diameter ≥ 4 mm or z score ≥ + 5) 30 days or later after KD onset.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 209 patients, 47 (22%) were taking ARBs/ ACEis. Compared with those in the non-ARB/ACEi group, the baseline CAA diameter was significantly greater (6.7 mm vs. 5.5 mm, p < 0.01), and bilateral CAA (70% vs. 59%, p = 0.01) and giant CAA (32% vs. 20%, p = 0.08) were more frequently observed in the ARB/ACEi group. Although the overall regression rates did not differ between the groups (67% vs. 65%), the regression rates of giant CAA were approximately 1.6 times greater in the ARB/ACEi group than in the non-ARB/ACEi group (36% vs. 23%). Multivariate Cox regression analysis after adjustment for other clinical variables suggested that ARBs/ACEis may be a factor in CAA regression (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.5, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.91-2.46).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although ARBs/ ACEis were used more frequently in patients with severe CAA, these patients had similar CAA regression rates to patients not taking ARBs/ACEis. ARBs/ACEis may be beneficial agents aimed at inducing CAA regression in KD patients.</p><p><strong>What is known: </strong>• Large CAAs are less likely to regress and are always at risk of life-threatening cardiac events. • Moderate CAA, age less than 1 year, and female sex have been reported to be factors that promote the regression of CAA.</p><p><strong>What is new: </strong>• Although ARBs/ACEis were used more frequently in patients with severe CAA, these patients had a similar rate of CAA regression to patients who did not take ARBs/ACEis. • The regression rates of giant CAA were approximately 1.6 times greater in the ARB/ACEi group than in the non-ARB/ACEi group.</p>","PeriodicalId":11997,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Pediatrics","volume":" ","pages":"4817-4825"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Regression effect of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors on Kawasaki disease patients with coronary artery aneurysm: a prospective, observational study.\",\"authors\":\"Eisuke Suganuma, Masaru Miura, Yutaro Koyama, Tohru Kobayashi, Tetsuji Kaneko, Tatsunori Hokosaki, Fujito Numano, Kenji Furuno, Junko Shiono, Shigeto Fuse, Ryuji Fukazawa, Yoshihide Mitani\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00431-024-05765-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study is to investigate whether angiotensin type 1 receptor blockers (ARBs) or angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEis) can regress coronary artery aneurysm (CAA) in patients with Kawasaki disease (KD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multicenter, prospective, observational study was conducted at 53 institutions throughout Japan. We enrolled patients who were diagnosed with KD after January 2015 and had a medium or large CAA (maximum luminal diameter ≥ 4 mm or z score ≥ + 5) 30 days or later after KD onset.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 209 patients, 47 (22%) were taking ARBs/ ACEis. Compared with those in the non-ARB/ACEi group, the baseline CAA diameter was significantly greater (6.7 mm vs. 5.5 mm, p < 0.01), and bilateral CAA (70% vs. 59%, p = 0.01) and giant CAA (32% vs. 20%, p = 0.08) were more frequently observed in the ARB/ACEi group. Although the overall regression rates did not differ between the groups (67% vs. 65%), the regression rates of giant CAA were approximately 1.6 times greater in the ARB/ACEi group than in the non-ARB/ACEi group (36% vs. 23%). Multivariate Cox regression analysis after adjustment for other clinical variables suggested that ARBs/ACEis may be a factor in CAA regression (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.5, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.91-2.46).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although ARBs/ ACEis were used more frequently in patients with severe CAA, these patients had similar CAA regression rates to patients not taking ARBs/ACEis. ARBs/ACEis may be beneficial agents aimed at inducing CAA regression in KD patients.</p><p><strong>What is known: </strong>• Large CAAs are less likely to regress and are always at risk of life-threatening cardiac events. • Moderate CAA, age less than 1 year, and female sex have been reported to be factors that promote the regression of CAA.</p><p><strong>What is new: </strong>• Although ARBs/ACEis were used more frequently in patients with severe CAA, these patients had a similar rate of CAA regression to patients who did not take ARBs/ACEis. • The regression rates of giant CAA were approximately 1.6 times greater in the ARB/ACEi group than in the non-ARB/ACEi group.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11997,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Pediatrics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"4817-4825\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Pediatrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-024-05765-3\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/6 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-024-05765-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Regression effect of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors on Kawasaki disease patients with coronary artery aneurysm: a prospective, observational study.
Purpose: This study is to investigate whether angiotensin type 1 receptor blockers (ARBs) or angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEis) can regress coronary artery aneurysm (CAA) in patients with Kawasaki disease (KD).
Methods: This multicenter, prospective, observational study was conducted at 53 institutions throughout Japan. We enrolled patients who were diagnosed with KD after January 2015 and had a medium or large CAA (maximum luminal diameter ≥ 4 mm or z score ≥ + 5) 30 days or later after KD onset.
Results: Of the 209 patients, 47 (22%) were taking ARBs/ ACEis. Compared with those in the non-ARB/ACEi group, the baseline CAA diameter was significantly greater (6.7 mm vs. 5.5 mm, p < 0.01), and bilateral CAA (70% vs. 59%, p = 0.01) and giant CAA (32% vs. 20%, p = 0.08) were more frequently observed in the ARB/ACEi group. Although the overall regression rates did not differ between the groups (67% vs. 65%), the regression rates of giant CAA were approximately 1.6 times greater in the ARB/ACEi group than in the non-ARB/ACEi group (36% vs. 23%). Multivariate Cox regression analysis after adjustment for other clinical variables suggested that ARBs/ACEis may be a factor in CAA regression (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.5, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.91-2.46).
Conclusions: Although ARBs/ ACEis were used more frequently in patients with severe CAA, these patients had similar CAA regression rates to patients not taking ARBs/ACEis. ARBs/ACEis may be beneficial agents aimed at inducing CAA regression in KD patients.
What is known: • Large CAAs are less likely to regress and are always at risk of life-threatening cardiac events. • Moderate CAA, age less than 1 year, and female sex have been reported to be factors that promote the regression of CAA.
What is new: • Although ARBs/ACEis were used more frequently in patients with severe CAA, these patients had a similar rate of CAA regression to patients who did not take ARBs/ACEis. • The regression rates of giant CAA were approximately 1.6 times greater in the ARB/ACEi group than in the non-ARB/ACEi group.
期刊介绍:
The European Journal of Pediatrics (EJPE) is a leading peer-reviewed medical journal which covers the entire field of pediatrics. The editors encourage authors to submit original articles, reviews, short communications, and correspondence on all relevant themes and topics.
EJPE is particularly committed to the publication of articles on important new clinical research that will have an immediate impact on clinical pediatric practice. The editorial office very much welcomes ideas for publications, whether individual articles or article series, that fit this goal and is always willing to address inquiries from authors regarding potential submissions. Invited review articles on clinical pediatrics that provide comprehensive coverage of a subject of importance are also regularly commissioned.
The short publication time reflects both the commitment of the editors and publishers and their passion for new developments in the field of pediatrics.
EJPE is active on social media (@EurJPediatrics) and we invite you to participate.
EJPE is the official journal of the European Academy of Paediatrics (EAP) and publishes guidelines and statements in cooperation with the EAP.