辅助性胆道内射频消融联合自膨胀胆道金属支架治疗不可切除的恶性肝门狭窄:一项务实的比较研究。

IF 2 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Indian Journal of Gastroenterology Pub Date : 2024-09-06 DOI:10.1007/s12664-024-01668-1
Nitin Jagtap, C Sai Kumar, Sundeep Lakhtakia, Mohan Ramchandani, Sana Fathima Memon, Shujaath Asif, Rakesh Kalapala, Zaheer Nabi, Jahangeer Basha, Rajesh Gupta, Manu Tandan, D Nageshwar Reddy
{"title":"辅助性胆道内射频消融联合自膨胀胆道金属支架治疗不可切除的恶性肝门狭窄:一项务实的比较研究。","authors":"Nitin Jagtap, C Sai Kumar, Sundeep Lakhtakia, Mohan Ramchandani, Sana Fathima Memon, Shujaath Asif, Rakesh Kalapala, Zaheer Nabi, Jahangeer Basha, Rajesh Gupta, Manu Tandan, D Nageshwar Reddy","doi":"10.1007/s12664-024-01668-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The role of endo-biliary radio-frequency ablation (EB-RFA) in treating malignant biliary strictures remains a subject of controversy. This study aims to assess the efficacy and safety of EB-RFA in conjunction with self-expandable metal stents (SEMS) compared to SEMS alone.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-center prospective pragmatic comparative study, conducted between June 2021 and November 2022, involved 23 patients undergoing EB-RFA plus SEMS and 48 patients undergoing SEMS for unresectable malignant hilar obstruction. The study evaluated overall survival, stent patency and adverse events.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-one patients (mean age [SD], 57.8 [11.2] years; 73.2% men) were enrolled. The clinical success rates did not significantly differ between the two groups (78.3% in EB-RFA and 66.6% in SEMS; p 0.316). The median (95% CI) overall survival was 155 (79.87-230.13) days in the EB-RFA group, contrasting with 86.0 (78.06-123.94) days in the SEMS group (p 0.020). The presence of carcinoma gallbladder (p 0.035; HR 0.55; 95% CI 0.32-0.96) and EB-RFA (p 0.047; HR 1.88; 95% CI 1.01-3.49) independently predicted overall survival. Median (95% CI) stent patency was 143.0 (95% CI, 61.61-224.39) days in the EB-RFA group compared to 78.0 (95% CI, 32.74-123.26) days in the SEMS group (p 0.019). The presence of carcinoma gallbladder (p 0.046, HR 0.60; 95% CI, 0.36-0.99), EB-RFA (p 0.023; HR 1.92; 95% CI, 1.10-3.36) and chemotherapy (p 0.017, HR 1.91; 95% CI, 1.12-3.26) independently predicted longer stent patency. There was no difference in procedure-related adverse events in both groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>EB-RFA with SEMS placement proves to be a safe and effective technique for palliative biliary decompression in patients with malignant biliary strictures, demonstrating superior overall survival and stent patency compared to SEMS alone. Further confirmation through multi-center trials is warranted.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov (ID: NCT05320328).</p>","PeriodicalId":13404,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Gastroenterology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Adjuvant endobiliary radio-frequency ablation combined with self-expandable biliary metal stents for unresectable malignant hilar strictures: A pragmatic comparative study.\",\"authors\":\"Nitin Jagtap, C Sai Kumar, Sundeep Lakhtakia, Mohan Ramchandani, Sana Fathima Memon, Shujaath Asif, Rakesh Kalapala, Zaheer Nabi, Jahangeer Basha, Rajesh Gupta, Manu Tandan, D Nageshwar Reddy\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12664-024-01668-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The role of endo-biliary radio-frequency ablation (EB-RFA) in treating malignant biliary strictures remains a subject of controversy. This study aims to assess the efficacy and safety of EB-RFA in conjunction with self-expandable metal stents (SEMS) compared to SEMS alone.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-center prospective pragmatic comparative study, conducted between June 2021 and November 2022, involved 23 patients undergoing EB-RFA plus SEMS and 48 patients undergoing SEMS for unresectable malignant hilar obstruction. The study evaluated overall survival, stent patency and adverse events.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-one patients (mean age [SD], 57.8 [11.2] years; 73.2% men) were enrolled. The clinical success rates did not significantly differ between the two groups (78.3% in EB-RFA and 66.6% in SEMS; p 0.316). The median (95% CI) overall survival was 155 (79.87-230.13) days in the EB-RFA group, contrasting with 86.0 (78.06-123.94) days in the SEMS group (p 0.020). The presence of carcinoma gallbladder (p 0.035; HR 0.55; 95% CI 0.32-0.96) and EB-RFA (p 0.047; HR 1.88; 95% CI 1.01-3.49) independently predicted overall survival. Median (95% CI) stent patency was 143.0 (95% CI, 61.61-224.39) days in the EB-RFA group compared to 78.0 (95% CI, 32.74-123.26) days in the SEMS group (p 0.019). The presence of carcinoma gallbladder (p 0.046, HR 0.60; 95% CI, 0.36-0.99), EB-RFA (p 0.023; HR 1.92; 95% CI, 1.10-3.36) and chemotherapy (p 0.017, HR 1.91; 95% CI, 1.12-3.26) independently predicted longer stent patency. There was no difference in procedure-related adverse events in both groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>EB-RFA with SEMS placement proves to be a safe and effective technique for palliative biliary decompression in patients with malignant biliary strictures, demonstrating superior overall survival and stent patency compared to SEMS alone. Further confirmation through multi-center trials is warranted.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov (ID: NCT05320328).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13404,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indian Journal of Gastroenterology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indian Journal of Gastroenterology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12664-024-01668-1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12664-024-01668-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:胆道内射频消融术(EB-RFA)在治疗恶性胆道狭窄中的作用仍存在争议。本研究旨在评估EB-RFA与自膨胀金属支架(SEMS)联合使用与单独使用的疗效和安全性:这项单中心前瞻性务实比较研究于 2021 年 6 月至 2022 年 11 月间进行,23 名患者接受了 EB-RFA 加 SEMS 治疗,48 名患者接受了 SEMS 治疗,以治疗不可切除的恶性肝门梗阻。研究评估了总生存率、支架通畅率和不良事件:71名患者(平均年龄[SD]为57.8[11.2]岁;73.2%为男性)入组。两组患者的临床成功率无明显差异(EB-RFA 为 78.3%,SEMS 为 66.6%;P 0.316)。EB-RFA 组的总生存期中位数(95% CI)为 155(79.87-230.13)天,而 SEMS 组为 86.0(78.06-123.94)天(P 0.020)。胆囊癌(P 0.035;HR 0.55;95% CI 0.32-0.96)和 EB-RFA(P 0.047;HR 1.88;95% CI 1.01-3.49)可独立预测总生存期。EB-RFA 组的支架通畅中位数(95% CI)为 143.0 天(95% CI,61.61-224.39),而 SEMS 组为 78.0 天(95% CI,32.74-123.26)(P 0.019)。胆囊癌(P0.046,HR 0.60;95% CI,0.36-0.99)、EB-RFA(P0.023;HR 1.92;95% CI,1.10-3.36)和化疗(P0.017,HR 1.91;95% CI,1.12-3.26)可独立预测更长的支架通畅时间。两组患者在手术相关不良事件方面没有差异:结论:EB-RFA联合SEMS置入术被证明是恶性胆道狭窄患者进行姑息性胆道减压的一种安全有效的技术,其总生存率和支架通畅率均优于单纯SEMS。临床试验注册:临床试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov(ID:NCT05320328)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Adjuvant endobiliary radio-frequency ablation combined with self-expandable biliary metal stents for unresectable malignant hilar strictures: A pragmatic comparative study.

Introduction: The role of endo-biliary radio-frequency ablation (EB-RFA) in treating malignant biliary strictures remains a subject of controversy. This study aims to assess the efficacy and safety of EB-RFA in conjunction with self-expandable metal stents (SEMS) compared to SEMS alone.

Methods: This single-center prospective pragmatic comparative study, conducted between June 2021 and November 2022, involved 23 patients undergoing EB-RFA plus SEMS and 48 patients undergoing SEMS for unresectable malignant hilar obstruction. The study evaluated overall survival, stent patency and adverse events.

Results: Seventy-one patients (mean age [SD], 57.8 [11.2] years; 73.2% men) were enrolled. The clinical success rates did not significantly differ between the two groups (78.3% in EB-RFA and 66.6% in SEMS; p 0.316). The median (95% CI) overall survival was 155 (79.87-230.13) days in the EB-RFA group, contrasting with 86.0 (78.06-123.94) days in the SEMS group (p 0.020). The presence of carcinoma gallbladder (p 0.035; HR 0.55; 95% CI 0.32-0.96) and EB-RFA (p 0.047; HR 1.88; 95% CI 1.01-3.49) independently predicted overall survival. Median (95% CI) stent patency was 143.0 (95% CI, 61.61-224.39) days in the EB-RFA group compared to 78.0 (95% CI, 32.74-123.26) days in the SEMS group (p 0.019). The presence of carcinoma gallbladder (p 0.046, HR 0.60; 95% CI, 0.36-0.99), EB-RFA (p 0.023; HR 1.92; 95% CI, 1.10-3.36) and chemotherapy (p 0.017, HR 1.91; 95% CI, 1.12-3.26) independently predicted longer stent patency. There was no difference in procedure-related adverse events in both groups.

Conclusion: EB-RFA with SEMS placement proves to be a safe and effective technique for palliative biliary decompression in patients with malignant biliary strictures, demonstrating superior overall survival and stent patency compared to SEMS alone. Further confirmation through multi-center trials is warranted.

Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (ID: NCT05320328).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Indian Journal of Gastroenterology
Indian Journal of Gastroenterology GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
10.00%
发文量
73
期刊介绍: The Indian Journal of Gastroenterology aims to help doctors everywhere practise better medicine and to influence the debate on gastroenterology. To achieve these aims, we publish original scientific studies, state-of -the-art special articles, reports and papers commenting on the clinical, scientific and public health factors affecting aspects of gastroenterology. We shall be delighted to receive articles for publication in all of these categories and letters commenting on the contents of the Journal or on issues of interest to our readers.
期刊最新文献
EUS FNAC without rapid on-site evaluation is comparable to EUS FNB with macroscopic on-site evaluation in evaluation of intra-abdominal masses. Acute liver failure and liver transplantation. A cross-cultural study translating and validating the COMPAT-SF pain questionnaire in Telugu, Bengali and Hindi. Effective prevention of hepatitis B transmission from pregnant women to babies in a real-life setting in India. Anemia in inflammatory bowel disease-A comprehensive review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1