将社会心理安全氛围(PSC)转化为现实世界的实践:两个 PSC 干预案例研究。

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Journal of Occupational Health Pub Date : 2024-01-04 DOI:10.1093/joccuh/uiae051
May Young Loh, Maureen F Dollard, Sarven S McLinton, Paula Brough
{"title":"将社会心理安全氛围(PSC)转化为现实世界的实践:两个 PSC 干预案例研究。","authors":"May Young Loh, Maureen F Dollard, Sarven S McLinton, Paula Brough","doi":"10.1093/joccuh/uiae051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Translating research into practice is often a goal for evidence-based organizational researchers to help improve workplace conditions and worker well-being. Improving worker well-being can be achieved by using empirical evidence to inform organizational interventions. However, despite the well-established intervention literature, practitioners appear not to appreciate fully how research findings can inform real-world practice. Using our understanding about workplace safety and health issues, we proposed that employers themselves could undertake interventions that focus on building psychosocial safety climate (PSC), an essential organizational climate that protects and promotes the psychological well-being of workers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Here we present 2 case studies to illustrate strategies that improve psychosocial safety and to increase our understanding about how interventions help improve PSC over time. Case Study 1 was conducted in an Australian public organization and Case Study 2 was in an international private organization. We collected survey data using the PSC-12 scale, to assess the level of PSC of the organization before and after the intervention, and details of the intervention and other initiatives for promoting employees' psychological health.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our evaluation supported the proposition that interventions that combine organizational-level and individual-level (and the interface between the two) approaches with a focus on the core elements of PSC (such as commitment, priority, communication, and participation) improve an organization's PSC over time.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The research not only elucidates important practical implications for organizations trialing new psychosocial safety initiatives, but also makes an important contribution to theory in work stress intervention on best practice and principles to build a psychologically healthy work context.</p>","PeriodicalId":16632,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Occupational Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11484795/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Translating psychosocial safety climate (PSC) into real-world practice: two PSC intervention case studies.\",\"authors\":\"May Young Loh, Maureen F Dollard, Sarven S McLinton, Paula Brough\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/joccuh/uiae051\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Translating research into practice is often a goal for evidence-based organizational researchers to help improve workplace conditions and worker well-being. Improving worker well-being can be achieved by using empirical evidence to inform organizational interventions. However, despite the well-established intervention literature, practitioners appear not to appreciate fully how research findings can inform real-world practice. Using our understanding about workplace safety and health issues, we proposed that employers themselves could undertake interventions that focus on building psychosocial safety climate (PSC), an essential organizational climate that protects and promotes the psychological well-being of workers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Here we present 2 case studies to illustrate strategies that improve psychosocial safety and to increase our understanding about how interventions help improve PSC over time. Case Study 1 was conducted in an Australian public organization and Case Study 2 was in an international private organization. We collected survey data using the PSC-12 scale, to assess the level of PSC of the organization before and after the intervention, and details of the intervention and other initiatives for promoting employees' psychological health.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our evaluation supported the proposition that interventions that combine organizational-level and individual-level (and the interface between the two) approaches with a focus on the core elements of PSC (such as commitment, priority, communication, and participation) improve an organization's PSC over time.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The research not only elucidates important practical implications for organizations trialing new psychosocial safety initiatives, but also makes an important contribution to theory in work stress intervention on best practice and principles to build a psychologically healthy work context.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16632,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Occupational Health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11484795/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Occupational Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/joccuh/uiae051\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Occupational Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/joccuh/uiae051","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:将研究成果转化为实践往往是循证组织研究人员的目标,以帮助改善工作场所条件和工人福利。利用经验证据为组织干预措施提供依据,可以改善工人的福利。然而,尽管干预措施的文献已得到充分证实,但从业人员似乎并不完全了解研究成果如何为现实世界的实践提供依据。利用我们对工作场所安全和健康问题的理解,我们建议雇主本身可以采取干预措施,重点建立社会心理安全氛围(PSC),这是一种保护和促进工人心理健康的基本组织氛围。方法:我们在此介绍两个案例研究,以说明改善社会心理安全的策略,并加深我们对干预措施如何随着时间的推移帮助改善社会心理安全氛围的理解。案例研究 1 在澳大利亚一家公共机构进行,案例研究 2 在一家国际私营机构进行。我们使用PSC-12量表收集了调查数据,以评估干预前后组织的PSC水平,以及干预和其他促进员工心理健康的措施的细节:结果:我们的评估支持这样的观点,即结合组织和个人层面(以及两者之间的衔接)的干预措施,重点关注PSC的核心要素(如承诺、优先权、沟通和参与),可以随着时间的推移改善组织的PSC:这项研究不仅阐明了新的社会心理安全倡议对组织的重要实际影响,而且我们的研究还对工作压力干预理论做出了重要贡献,为建立心理健康的工作环境提供了最佳实践和原则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Translating psychosocial safety climate (PSC) into real-world practice: two PSC intervention case studies.

Objectives: Translating research into practice is often a goal for evidence-based organizational researchers to help improve workplace conditions and worker well-being. Improving worker well-being can be achieved by using empirical evidence to inform organizational interventions. However, despite the well-established intervention literature, practitioners appear not to appreciate fully how research findings can inform real-world practice. Using our understanding about workplace safety and health issues, we proposed that employers themselves could undertake interventions that focus on building psychosocial safety climate (PSC), an essential organizational climate that protects and promotes the psychological well-being of workers.

Methods: Here we present 2 case studies to illustrate strategies that improve psychosocial safety and to increase our understanding about how interventions help improve PSC over time. Case Study 1 was conducted in an Australian public organization and Case Study 2 was in an international private organization. We collected survey data using the PSC-12 scale, to assess the level of PSC of the organization before and after the intervention, and details of the intervention and other initiatives for promoting employees' psychological health.

Results: Our evaluation supported the proposition that interventions that combine organizational-level and individual-level (and the interface between the two) approaches with a focus on the core elements of PSC (such as commitment, priority, communication, and participation) improve an organization's PSC over time.

Conclusions: The research not only elucidates important practical implications for organizations trialing new psychosocial safety initiatives, but also makes an important contribution to theory in work stress intervention on best practice and principles to build a psychologically healthy work context.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Occupational Health
Journal of Occupational Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
3.30%
发文量
57
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The scope of the journal is broad, covering toxicology, ergonomics, psychosocial factors and other relevant health issues of workers, with special emphasis on the current developments in occupational health. The JOH also accepts various methodologies that are relevant to investigation of occupational health risk factors and exposures, such as large-scale epidemiological studies, human studies employing biological techniques and fundamental experiments on animals, and also welcomes submissions concerning occupational health practices and related issues.
期刊最新文献
The impact of overseas assignments on metabolic factors: Panasonic cohort study 23. Associations of physical activity and sedentary time with psychological distress among Japan self-defense forces personnel dispatched overseas: a prospective cohort study. Association between physical activity patterns of working-age adults and social jetlag, depressive symptoms, and presenteeism. Are there compensatory behaviors in response to a sit-stand desk intervention? Comment on "Occupational Health Staff's Involvement Contributes to Supervisor's Perceived Organizational Support in Japanese Workforce: A Prospective Cohort Study".
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1