2017 年至 2023 年在三级医疗中心进行的低滴度血清隐球菌抗原检测的意义。

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 INFECTIOUS DISEASES Medical mycology Pub Date : 2024-09-06 DOI:10.1093/mmy/myae093
Thein Myint, Jenna R Wilson, Mahesh Bhatt, Mark E Irwin, Julie A Ribes
{"title":"2017 年至 2023 年在三级医疗中心进行的低滴度血清隐球菌抗原检测的意义。","authors":"Thein Myint, Jenna R Wilson, Mahesh Bhatt, Mark E Irwin, Julie A Ribes","doi":"10.1093/mmy/myae093","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Several false positive low serum cryptococcal antigen (SCrAg) reports by lateral flow assay (LFA) were identified in late 2016 at our tertiary care hospital. After the recall and correction of the problem in the reagent, we studied the significance of SCrAg LFA ≤ 1:10 from January 2017 to October 2023. Of 20 patients with 31 samples of SCrAg LFA ≤ 1:10, 14 patients (70%) were classified as true positives, four (20%) were indeterminate, and only two (10%) patients were false positives. If a new SCrAg LFA ≤ 1:10 is detected, it should be repeated, and additional workup should be pursued.</p>","PeriodicalId":18586,"journal":{"name":"Medical mycology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The significance of low titer serum cryptococcal antigen testing from 2017 to 2023 performed in a tertiary care center.\",\"authors\":\"Thein Myint, Jenna R Wilson, Mahesh Bhatt, Mark E Irwin, Julie A Ribes\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/mmy/myae093\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Several false positive low serum cryptococcal antigen (SCrAg) reports by lateral flow assay (LFA) were identified in late 2016 at our tertiary care hospital. After the recall and correction of the problem in the reagent, we studied the significance of SCrAg LFA ≤ 1:10 from January 2017 to October 2023. Of 20 patients with 31 samples of SCrAg LFA ≤ 1:10, 14 patients (70%) were classified as true positives, four (20%) were indeterminate, and only two (10%) patients were false positives. If a new SCrAg LFA ≤ 1:10 is detected, it should be repeated, and additional workup should be pursued.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18586,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical mycology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical mycology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/mmy/myae093\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical mycology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/mmy/myae093","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2016年末,我们所在的三级甲等医院发现了几例血清隐球菌抗原(SCrAg)侧流测定法(LFA)的低血清隐球菌抗原(SCrAg)假阳性报告。在召回并纠正试剂中的问题后,我们研究了 2017 年 1 月至 2023 年 10 月期间 SCrAg LFA ≤ 1:10 的意义。在20名患者的31份SCrAg LFA≤1:10的样本中,14名患者(70%)被归类为真阳性,4名患者(20%)为不确定,只有2名患者(10%)为假阳性。如果检测到新的 SCrAg LFA ≤1:10,则应重复检测,并继续进行其他检查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The significance of low titer serum cryptococcal antigen testing from 2017 to 2023 performed in a tertiary care center.

Several false positive low serum cryptococcal antigen (SCrAg) reports by lateral flow assay (LFA) were identified in late 2016 at our tertiary care hospital. After the recall and correction of the problem in the reagent, we studied the significance of SCrAg LFA ≤ 1:10 from January 2017 to October 2023. Of 20 patients with 31 samples of SCrAg LFA ≤ 1:10, 14 patients (70%) were classified as true positives, four (20%) were indeterminate, and only two (10%) patients were false positives. If a new SCrAg LFA ≤ 1:10 is detected, it should be repeated, and additional workup should be pursued.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medical mycology
Medical mycology 医学-兽医学
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
3.40%
发文量
632
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Medical Mycology is a peer-reviewed international journal that focuses on original and innovative basic and applied studies, as well as learned reviews on all aspects of medical, veterinary and environmental mycology as related to disease. The objective is to present the highest quality scientific reports from throughout the world on divergent topics. These topics include the phylogeny of fungal pathogens, epidemiology and public health mycology themes, new approaches in the diagnosis and treatment of mycoses including clinical trials and guidelines, pharmacology and antifungal susceptibilities, changes in taxonomy, description of new or unusual fungi associated with human or animal disease, immunology of fungal infections, vaccinology for prevention of fungal infections, pathogenesis and virulence, and the molecular biology of pathogenic fungi in vitro and in vivo, including genomics, transcriptomics, metabolomics, and proteomics. Case reports are no longer accepted. In addition, studies of natural products showing inhibitory activity against pathogenic fungi are not accepted without chemical characterization and identification of the compounds responsible for the inhibitory activity.
期刊最新文献
Microsporum audouinii: Emergence of an Etiological Agent of Tinea Capitis in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil (2012-2019). Invasive Candidiasis in a Pediatric Tertiary Hospital: Epidemiology, Antifungal Susceptibility, and Mortality Rates. Prevalence of azole-resistant A. fumigatus and other aspergilli in the environment from Argentina. Advances in the understanding of talaromycosis in HIV-negative patients (Especially in children and patients with hematological malignancies): A comprehensive review Evaluation of an in-house Pan-Malassezia quantitative PCR in human clinical samples
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1