深度学习辅助肺癌交互式轮廓绘制:对轮廓绘制时间和一致性的影响

IF 4.9 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Radiotherapy and Oncology Pub Date : 2024-09-03 DOI:10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110500
{"title":"深度学习辅助肺癌交互式轮廓绘制:对轮廓绘制时间和一致性的影响","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110500","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and Purpose</h3><p>To evaluate the impact of a deep learning (DL)-assisted interactive contouring tool on inter-observer variability and the time taken to complete tumour contouring.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><p>Nine clinicians contoured the gross tumour volume (GTV) using the PET-CT scans of 10 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, either using DL-assisted or manual contouring tools. After contouring a case using one contouring method, the same case was contoured one week later using the other method. The contours and time taken were compared.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Use of the DL-assisted tool led to a statistically significant decrease in active contouring time of 23 % relative to the standard manual segmentation method (p &lt; 0.01). The mean observation time for all clinicians and cases made up nearly 60 % of interaction time for both contouring approaches. On average the time spent contouring per case was reduced from 22 min to 19 min when using the DL-assisted tool. Additionally, the DL-assisted tool reduced contour variability in the parts of tumour where clinicians tended to disagree the most, while the consensus contour was similar whichever of the two contouring approaches was used.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>A DL-assisted interactive contouring approach decreased active contouring time and local inter-observer variability when used to delineate lung cancer GTVs compared to a standard manual method. Integration of this tool into the clinical workflow could assist clinicians in contouring tasks and improve contouring efficiency.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":21041,"journal":{"name":"Radiotherapy and Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167814024007709/pdfft?md5=8fc6323e4fa571961ec2a84da65d7a36&pid=1-s2.0-S0167814024007709-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Deep learning-assisted interactive contouring of lung cancer: Impact on contouring time and consistency\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110500\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background and Purpose</h3><p>To evaluate the impact of a deep learning (DL)-assisted interactive contouring tool on inter-observer variability and the time taken to complete tumour contouring.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><p>Nine clinicians contoured the gross tumour volume (GTV) using the PET-CT scans of 10 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, either using DL-assisted or manual contouring tools. After contouring a case using one contouring method, the same case was contoured one week later using the other method. The contours and time taken were compared.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Use of the DL-assisted tool led to a statistically significant decrease in active contouring time of 23 % relative to the standard manual segmentation method (p &lt; 0.01). The mean observation time for all clinicians and cases made up nearly 60 % of interaction time for both contouring approaches. On average the time spent contouring per case was reduced from 22 min to 19 min when using the DL-assisted tool. Additionally, the DL-assisted tool reduced contour variability in the parts of tumour where clinicians tended to disagree the most, while the consensus contour was similar whichever of the two contouring approaches was used.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>A DL-assisted interactive contouring approach decreased active contouring time and local inter-observer variability when used to delineate lung cancer GTVs compared to a standard manual method. Integration of this tool into the clinical workflow could assist clinicians in contouring tasks and improve contouring efficiency.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21041,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Radiotherapy and Oncology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167814024007709/pdfft?md5=8fc6323e4fa571961ec2a84da65d7a36&pid=1-s2.0-S0167814024007709-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Radiotherapy and Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167814024007709\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiotherapy and Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167814024007709","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:评估深度学习(DL)辅助的交互式轮廓工具对观察者间差异和完成肿瘤轮廓绘制所需时间的影响:九名临床医生使用DL辅助或手动轮廓工具,利用10名非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者的PET-CT扫描结果对肿瘤总体积(GTV)进行轮廓分析。使用一种轮廓绘制方法绘制病例轮廓后,一周后再使用另一种方法绘制同一病例的轮廓。结果:结果:使用 DL 辅助工具后,主动轮廓绘制时间比标准手动分割方法显著减少了 23%(p 结论:使用 DL 辅助交互式轮廓绘制工具,能显著减少主动轮廓绘制时间:与标准手动方法相比,使用 DL 辅助交互式轮廓划分方法划分肺癌 GTV 时,可减少主动轮廓划分时间和局部观察者间的变异性。将这一工具整合到临床工作流程中可以帮助临床医生完成轮廓绘制任务,提高轮廓绘制效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Deep learning-assisted interactive contouring of lung cancer: Impact on contouring time and consistency

Background and Purpose

To evaluate the impact of a deep learning (DL)-assisted interactive contouring tool on inter-observer variability and the time taken to complete tumour contouring.

Materials and Methods

Nine clinicians contoured the gross tumour volume (GTV) using the PET-CT scans of 10 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, either using DL-assisted or manual contouring tools. After contouring a case using one contouring method, the same case was contoured one week later using the other method. The contours and time taken were compared.

Results

Use of the DL-assisted tool led to a statistically significant decrease in active contouring time of 23 % relative to the standard manual segmentation method (p < 0.01). The mean observation time for all clinicians and cases made up nearly 60 % of interaction time for both contouring approaches. On average the time spent contouring per case was reduced from 22 min to 19 min when using the DL-assisted tool. Additionally, the DL-assisted tool reduced contour variability in the parts of tumour where clinicians tended to disagree the most, while the consensus contour was similar whichever of the two contouring approaches was used.

Conclusions

A DL-assisted interactive contouring approach decreased active contouring time and local inter-observer variability when used to delineate lung cancer GTVs compared to a standard manual method. Integration of this tool into the clinical workflow could assist clinicians in contouring tasks and improve contouring efficiency.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Radiotherapy and Oncology
Radiotherapy and Oncology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
10.50%
发文量
2445
审稿时长
45 days
期刊介绍: Radiotherapy and Oncology publishes papers describing original research as well as review articles. It covers areas of interest relating to radiation oncology. This includes: clinical radiotherapy, combined modality treatment, translational studies, epidemiological outcomes, imaging, dosimetry, and radiation therapy planning, experimental work in radiobiology, chemobiology, hyperthermia and tumour biology, as well as data science in radiation oncology and physics aspects relevant to oncology.Papers on more general aspects of interest to the radiation oncologist including chemotherapy, surgery and immunology are also published.
期刊最新文献
Local control and toxicity after stereotactic radiotherapy in brain metastases patients and the impact of novel systemic treatments Automated dose evaluation on daily cone-beam computed tomography for breast cancer patients Fructose 1,6-bisphosphate aldolase: A promising prognostic marker for oral cancer and its role in radiotherapy response Enhanced radiosensitivity of pancreatic cancer achieved through inhibition of Cyclin-dependent kinase 1 Physical activity at diagnosis is associated with tumor downstaging after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in patients with rectal cancer
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1