在主动脉瓣置换术患者中,腺苷诱导的心脏麻痹停搏与生理盐水的心脏保护作用:随机对照试验。

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q1 SURGERY Scandinavian Journal of Surgery Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-05 DOI:10.1177/14574969241266716
Mikko S Mattila, Kati M Järvelä, Markku J Rantanen, Suvi Tuohinen, Kjell C Nikus, Jari O Laurikka
{"title":"在主动脉瓣置换术患者中,腺苷诱导的心脏麻痹停搏与生理盐水的心脏保护作用:随机对照试验。","authors":"Mikko S Mattila, Kati M Järvelä, Markku J Rantanen, Suvi Tuohinen, Kjell C Nikus, Jari O Laurikka","doi":"10.1177/14574969241266716","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Adenosine is a widely used potent cardioprotective drug, but the effect of an adenosine bolus in initial cardioplegia on cardioprotection in aortic valve replacement (AVR) patients has not been demonstrated. The aim of this double-blind randomized clinical trial was to compare intra-aortic adenosine bolus with saline on the postoperative myocardial function in patients undergoing AVR.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Aortic valve stenosis patients scheduled for elective or urgent AVR surgery were randomized to receive either a 20 mg (4 mL) single dose of adenosine or a saline into the ascending aorta during the first cardioplegia infusion. The primary outcome was cardiac index (CI (L/min/m<sup>2</sup>) at four timepoints (before incision, after weaning from cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), at 7 p.m. on the operation day, and at 6 a.m. the next morning). Secondary outcomes included left ventricular stroke work index, right ventricular stroke work index, and myocardial biomarkers at the same timepoints.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between November 2015 and March 2018, 45 patients were recruited, 23 in the adenosine group and 22 in the placebo group. The last follow-up date was 17 March 2018. There were no statistically significant differences in CI (mean differences with 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 0.09 L/min/m<sup>2</sup> at baseline (-0.20 to 0.38), -1.39 L/min/m<sup>2</sup> (-3.47 to 0.70) at post-CPB, -0.39 L/min/m<sup>2</sup> (-0.78 to 0.004) at 7 p.m., and -0.32 L/min/m<sup>2</sup> (-0.68 to 0.05) at 6 a.m., (<i>p</i> = 0.066)), right ventricular stroke work index, (<i>p</i> = 0.24), or cardiac biomarkers between the groups. Left ventricular stroke work index was lower in the adenosine group (-3.66 gm/m<sup>2</sup> (-11.13 to 3.81) at baseline, -17.42 gm/m<sup>2</sup> (-37.81 to 2.98) at post-CPB, -3.36 gm/m<sup>2</sup> (-11.10 to 4.38) at 7 p.m., and -3.77 gm/m<sup>2</sup> (-10.19 to 2.66) at 6 a.m. (<i>p</i> = 0.021)).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There were no differences between 20 mg adenosine bolus and saline in the first cardioplegia infusion in CI improvement in AVR surgery for aortic valve stenosis.EudraCT number: 2014-001382-26.</p>","PeriodicalId":49566,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"273-281"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The cardioprotective effects of adenosine-induced cardioplegic arrest versus saline in aortic valve replacement patients: A randomized controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Mikko S Mattila, Kati M Järvelä, Markku J Rantanen, Suvi Tuohinen, Kjell C Nikus, Jari O Laurikka\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/14574969241266716\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Adenosine is a widely used potent cardioprotective drug, but the effect of an adenosine bolus in initial cardioplegia on cardioprotection in aortic valve replacement (AVR) patients has not been demonstrated. The aim of this double-blind randomized clinical trial was to compare intra-aortic adenosine bolus with saline on the postoperative myocardial function in patients undergoing AVR.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Aortic valve stenosis patients scheduled for elective or urgent AVR surgery were randomized to receive either a 20 mg (4 mL) single dose of adenosine or a saline into the ascending aorta during the first cardioplegia infusion. The primary outcome was cardiac index (CI (L/min/m<sup>2</sup>) at four timepoints (before incision, after weaning from cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), at 7 p.m. on the operation day, and at 6 a.m. the next morning). Secondary outcomes included left ventricular stroke work index, right ventricular stroke work index, and myocardial biomarkers at the same timepoints.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between November 2015 and March 2018, 45 patients were recruited, 23 in the adenosine group and 22 in the placebo group. The last follow-up date was 17 March 2018. There were no statistically significant differences in CI (mean differences with 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 0.09 L/min/m<sup>2</sup> at baseline (-0.20 to 0.38), -1.39 L/min/m<sup>2</sup> (-3.47 to 0.70) at post-CPB, -0.39 L/min/m<sup>2</sup> (-0.78 to 0.004) at 7 p.m., and -0.32 L/min/m<sup>2</sup> (-0.68 to 0.05) at 6 a.m., (<i>p</i> = 0.066)), right ventricular stroke work index, (<i>p</i> = 0.24), or cardiac biomarkers between the groups. Left ventricular stroke work index was lower in the adenosine group (-3.66 gm/m<sup>2</sup> (-11.13 to 3.81) at baseline, -17.42 gm/m<sup>2</sup> (-37.81 to 2.98) at post-CPB, -3.36 gm/m<sup>2</sup> (-11.10 to 4.38) at 7 p.m., and -3.77 gm/m<sup>2</sup> (-10.19 to 2.66) at 6 a.m. (<i>p</i> = 0.021)).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There were no differences between 20 mg adenosine bolus and saline in the first cardioplegia infusion in CI improvement in AVR surgery for aortic valve stenosis.EudraCT number: 2014-001382-26.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49566,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scandinavian Journal of Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"273-281\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scandinavian Journal of Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/14574969241266716\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/5 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14574969241266716","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:腺苷是一种广泛使用的强效心脏保护药物,但在主动脉瓣置换术(AVR)患者的初始心脏麻痹中注射腺苷栓剂对心脏保护的影响尚未得到证实。这项双盲随机临床试验旨在比较主动脉内注射腺苷栓剂与生理盐水对主动脉瓣置换术患者术后心肌功能的影响:主动脉瓣狭窄患者计划接受择期或紧急房室重建手术,他们被随机分配到接受 20 毫克(4 毫升)单剂量腺苷或在第一次心脏麻痹输注时向升主动脉内注入生理盐水。主要结果是四个时间点(切口前、心肺旁路(CPB)断流后、手术当天晚上 7 点和第二天早上 6 点)的心脏指数(CI(L/min/m2))。次要结果包括同一时间点的左心室卒中功指数、右心室卒中功指数和心肌生物标志物:2015年11月至2018年3月期间,共招募了45名患者,其中腺苷组23人,安慰剂组22人。最后一次随访日期为 2018 年 3 月 17 日。CI差异无统计学意义(平均差异与 95% 置信区间 (95% CI):基线时为 0.09 L/min/m2 (-0.20 至 0.38),CPB 后为 -1.39 L/min/m2 (-3.47 至 0.70),下午 7 时为 -0.39 L/min/m2 (-0.78 至 0.004)、和-0.32 L/min/m2 (-0.68 to 0.05) at 6 a.m., (p = 0.066))、右心室搏动功指数(p = 0.24)或心脏生物标志物。腺苷组的左心室搏动功指数较低(基线时为-3.66 gm/m2 (-11.13 to 3.81),CPB后为-17.42 gm/m2 (-37.81 to 2.98),下午7点为-3.36 gm/m2 (-11.10 to 4.38),早上6点为-3.77 gm/m2 (-10.19 to 2.66) (p = 0.021)):在主动脉瓣狭窄的 AVR 手术中,20 毫克腺苷栓剂和生理盐水在首次心脏麻痹输注的 CI 改善方面没有差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The cardioprotective effects of adenosine-induced cardioplegic arrest versus saline in aortic valve replacement patients: A randomized controlled trial.

Background and aims: Adenosine is a widely used potent cardioprotective drug, but the effect of an adenosine bolus in initial cardioplegia on cardioprotection in aortic valve replacement (AVR) patients has not been demonstrated. The aim of this double-blind randomized clinical trial was to compare intra-aortic adenosine bolus with saline on the postoperative myocardial function in patients undergoing AVR.

Methods: Aortic valve stenosis patients scheduled for elective or urgent AVR surgery were randomized to receive either a 20 mg (4 mL) single dose of adenosine or a saline into the ascending aorta during the first cardioplegia infusion. The primary outcome was cardiac index (CI (L/min/m2) at four timepoints (before incision, after weaning from cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), at 7 p.m. on the operation day, and at 6 a.m. the next morning). Secondary outcomes included left ventricular stroke work index, right ventricular stroke work index, and myocardial biomarkers at the same timepoints.

Results: Between November 2015 and March 2018, 45 patients were recruited, 23 in the adenosine group and 22 in the placebo group. The last follow-up date was 17 March 2018. There were no statistically significant differences in CI (mean differences with 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 0.09 L/min/m2 at baseline (-0.20 to 0.38), -1.39 L/min/m2 (-3.47 to 0.70) at post-CPB, -0.39 L/min/m2 (-0.78 to 0.004) at 7 p.m., and -0.32 L/min/m2 (-0.68 to 0.05) at 6 a.m., (p = 0.066)), right ventricular stroke work index, (p = 0.24), or cardiac biomarkers between the groups. Left ventricular stroke work index was lower in the adenosine group (-3.66 gm/m2 (-11.13 to 3.81) at baseline, -17.42 gm/m2 (-37.81 to 2.98) at post-CPB, -3.36 gm/m2 (-11.10 to 4.38) at 7 p.m., and -3.77 gm/m2 (-10.19 to 2.66) at 6 a.m. (p = 0.021)).

Conclusions: There were no differences between 20 mg adenosine bolus and saline in the first cardioplegia infusion in CI improvement in AVR surgery for aortic valve stenosis.EudraCT number: 2014-001382-26.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
4.20%
发文量
37
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Scandinavian Journal of Surgery (SJS) is the official peer reviewed journal of the Finnish Surgical Society and the Scandinavian Surgical Society. It publishes original and review articles from all surgical fields and specialties to reflect the interests of our diverse and international readership that consists of surgeons from all specialties and continents.
期刊最新文献
A randomized double-blind noninferiority clinical multicenter trial on oral moxifloxacin versus placebo in the outpatient treatment of uncomplicated acute appendicitis: APPAC IV study protocol. Modern surgical treatments for lymphedema. Impact of oral administration of calcitriol to prevent symptomatic hypocalcemia after total thyroidectomy: Systematic review and meta-analysis. 16-year outcomes of blunt thoracic aortic injury treated with thoracic endovascular aortic repair: A single-institution experience. Reducing the risk of cancer with bariatric surgery: The need for evidence to guide practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1