Tanguy Le Corre, Hélène Bisseriex, Christelle Pons, Olivier Rémy-Néris
{"title":"下肢大截肢后坐立时的负重不对称:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Tanguy Le Corre, Hélène Bisseriex, Christelle Pons, Olivier Rémy-Néris","doi":"10.1097/PXR.0000000000000354","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Weight-bearing asymmetry during sit-to-stand (STS) can cause musculoskeletal problems in people with major lower-limb amputation. Does weight-bearing asymmetry differ between individuals with major lower-limb amputation and individuals without amputation? We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis. We searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and HAL up to June 2022 using keywords and inclusion/exclusion criteria. Article quality was assessed. Data for population, intervention, weight-bearing asymmetry, and biomechanical analysis were reported. Standardized mean differences (SMDs) were calculated from the outcomes when possible. We included 11 studies (102 people with amputation). Weight-bearing asymmetry was greater in people with amputation than those without amputation (SMD = 1.72 [1.30-2.14] p < 0.00001). It was greater for individuals with transtibial amputation (TTA) and with transfemoral amputation (TFA) than for those without amputation (SMD = 1.20 [0.76-1.65] p < 0.00001 and SMD = 5.32 [4.15-6.50] p < 0.00001, respectively). STS performance time was longer for people with amputation (SMD = 0.52 [0.23-0.81] p = 0.0004) than those without amputation. Trunk motion differed in those with amputation, and lower-limb kinematics differed considerably, especially for people with TFA. Weight-bearing is more asymmetric in people with amputation than in people without amputation. The differences in weight-bearing asymmetry and kinematics during STS between people with TTA and TFA suggest that different strategies are required to improve weight-bearing symmetry: improvements in active prosthetic knees in TFA and rehabilitation focused on weight-bearing in TTA.</p>","PeriodicalId":49657,"journal":{"name":"Prosthetics and Orthotics International","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Weight-bearing asymmetry during sit-to-stand after major lower-limb amputation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Tanguy Le Corre, Hélène Bisseriex, Christelle Pons, Olivier Rémy-Néris\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/PXR.0000000000000354\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Weight-bearing asymmetry during sit-to-stand (STS) can cause musculoskeletal problems in people with major lower-limb amputation. Does weight-bearing asymmetry differ between individuals with major lower-limb amputation and individuals without amputation? We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis. We searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and HAL up to June 2022 using keywords and inclusion/exclusion criteria. Article quality was assessed. Data for population, intervention, weight-bearing asymmetry, and biomechanical analysis were reported. Standardized mean differences (SMDs) were calculated from the outcomes when possible. We included 11 studies (102 people with amputation). Weight-bearing asymmetry was greater in people with amputation than those without amputation (SMD = 1.72 [1.30-2.14] p < 0.00001). It was greater for individuals with transtibial amputation (TTA) and with transfemoral amputation (TFA) than for those without amputation (SMD = 1.20 [0.76-1.65] p < 0.00001 and SMD = 5.32 [4.15-6.50] p < 0.00001, respectively). STS performance time was longer for people with amputation (SMD = 0.52 [0.23-0.81] p = 0.0004) than those without amputation. Trunk motion differed in those with amputation, and lower-limb kinematics differed considerably, especially for people with TFA. Weight-bearing is more asymmetric in people with amputation than in people without amputation. The differences in weight-bearing asymmetry and kinematics during STS between people with TTA and TFA suggest that different strategies are required to improve weight-bearing symmetry: improvements in active prosthetic knees in TFA and rehabilitation focused on weight-bearing in TTA.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49657,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Prosthetics and Orthotics International\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Prosthetics and Orthotics International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/PXR.0000000000000354\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prosthetics and Orthotics International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PXR.0000000000000354","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
坐立(STS)过程中的负重不对称会给下肢大截肢者带来肌肉骨骼问题。下肢大截肢者与非截肢者之间的负重不对称是否存在差异?我们进行了一项系统回顾和荟萃分析。我们使用关键词和纳入/排除标准检索了 PubMed、Cochrane 图书馆、Web of Science 和 HAL(截至 2022 年 6 月)。对文章质量进行了评估。报告了人群、干预、负重不对称和生物力学分析数据。在可能的情况下,根据结果计算标准化平均差(SMD)。我们纳入了 11 项研究(102 名截肢者)。截肢者的负重不对称程度高于未截肢者(SMD = 1.72 [1.30-2.14] p < 0.00001)。经胫骨截肢(TTA)和经股骨截肢(TFA)者的不对称程度高于无截肢者(SMD = 1.20 [0.76-1.65] p < 0.00001 和 SMD = 5.32 [4.15-6.50] p < 0.00001)。与无截肢者相比,截肢者的STS表现时间更长(SMD = 0.52 [0.23-0.81] p = 0.0004)。截肢者的躯干运动不同,下肢运动学也有很大差异,尤其是全膝关节置换术患者。与未截肢者相比,截肢者的负重更不对称。TTA和TFA患者在STS期间负重不对称和运动学方面的差异表明,需要采取不同的策略来改善负重对称性:TFA患者需要改进主动假体膝关节,而TTA患者则需要进行以负重为重点的康复训练。
Weight-bearing asymmetry during sit-to-stand after major lower-limb amputation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Weight-bearing asymmetry during sit-to-stand (STS) can cause musculoskeletal problems in people with major lower-limb amputation. Does weight-bearing asymmetry differ between individuals with major lower-limb amputation and individuals without amputation? We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis. We searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and HAL up to June 2022 using keywords and inclusion/exclusion criteria. Article quality was assessed. Data for population, intervention, weight-bearing asymmetry, and biomechanical analysis were reported. Standardized mean differences (SMDs) were calculated from the outcomes when possible. We included 11 studies (102 people with amputation). Weight-bearing asymmetry was greater in people with amputation than those without amputation (SMD = 1.72 [1.30-2.14] p < 0.00001). It was greater for individuals with transtibial amputation (TTA) and with transfemoral amputation (TFA) than for those without amputation (SMD = 1.20 [0.76-1.65] p < 0.00001 and SMD = 5.32 [4.15-6.50] p < 0.00001, respectively). STS performance time was longer for people with amputation (SMD = 0.52 [0.23-0.81] p = 0.0004) than those without amputation. Trunk motion differed in those with amputation, and lower-limb kinematics differed considerably, especially for people with TFA. Weight-bearing is more asymmetric in people with amputation than in people without amputation. The differences in weight-bearing asymmetry and kinematics during STS between people with TTA and TFA suggest that different strategies are required to improve weight-bearing symmetry: improvements in active prosthetic knees in TFA and rehabilitation focused on weight-bearing in TTA.
期刊介绍:
Prosthetics and Orthotics International is an international, multidisciplinary journal for all professionals who have an interest in the medical, clinical, rehabilitation, technical, educational and research aspects of prosthetics, orthotics and rehabilitation engineering, as well as their related topics.