Tharani Sivakumaran, Anthony Cardin, Jason Callahan, Hui-Li Wong, Richard W Tothill, Rodney J Hicks, Linda R Mileshkin
{"title":"评估 18F-FDG PET/CT 在原发性不明癌症中的实用性。","authors":"Tharani Sivakumaran, Anthony Cardin, Jason Callahan, Hui-Li Wong, Richard W Tothill, Rodney J Hicks, Linda R Mileshkin","doi":"10.2967/jnumed.123.267274","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cancer of unknown primary (CUP) represents a heterogeneous group of metastatic tumors for which standardized diagnostic work-up fails to identify the primary site. We aimed to describe the Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre experience with <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT in extracervical CUP with respect to detection of a primary site and its impact on management. A secondary aim was to compare overall survival (OS) in patients with and without a detected primary site. <b>Methods:</b> CUP patients treated between 2014 and 2020 were identified from medical oncology clinics and <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT records. Information collated from electronic medical records included the suspected primary site and treatment details before and after <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT. Clinicopathologic details and genomic analysis were used to determine the clinically suspected primary site and compared against 2 independent masked reads of <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT images by nuclear medicine specialists to determine sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and the rate of detection of the primary site. <b>Results:</b> We identified 147 patients, 65% of whom had undergone molecular profiling. The median age at diagnosis was 61 y (range, 20-84 y), and the median follow-up time was 74 mo (range, 26-83 mo). Eighty-two percent were classified as having an unfavorable CUP subtype as per international guidelines.<sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT demonstrated a primary site detection rate of 41%, resulted in a change in management in 22%, and identified previously occult disease sites in 37%. Median OS was 16.8 mo for all patients and 104.7 and 12.1 mo for favorable and unfavorable CUP subtypes, respectively (<i>P</i> < 0.0001). Median OS in CUP patients when using <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT, clinicopathologic, and genomic information was 19.8 and 8.5 mo when a primary site was detected and not detected, respectively (<i>P</i> = 0.016). Multivariable analysis of survival adjusted for age and sex remained significant for identification of a potential primary site (<i>P</i> < 0.001), a favorable CUP (<i>P</i> < 0.001), and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group status of 1 or less (<i>P</i> < 0.001). <b>Conclusion:</b> <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT plays a complementary role in CUP diagnostic work-up and was able to determine the likely primary site in 41% of cases. OS is improved with primary site identification, demonstrating the value of access to diagnostic <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT for CUP patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":94099,"journal":{"name":"Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1557-1563"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating the Utility of <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT in Cancer of Unknown Primary.\",\"authors\":\"Tharani Sivakumaran, Anthony Cardin, Jason Callahan, Hui-Li Wong, Richard W Tothill, Rodney J Hicks, Linda R Mileshkin\",\"doi\":\"10.2967/jnumed.123.267274\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Cancer of unknown primary (CUP) represents a heterogeneous group of metastatic tumors for which standardized diagnostic work-up fails to identify the primary site. We aimed to describe the Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre experience with <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT in extracervical CUP with respect to detection of a primary site and its impact on management. A secondary aim was to compare overall survival (OS) in patients with and without a detected primary site. <b>Methods:</b> CUP patients treated between 2014 and 2020 were identified from medical oncology clinics and <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT records. Information collated from electronic medical records included the suspected primary site and treatment details before and after <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT. Clinicopathologic details and genomic analysis were used to determine the clinically suspected primary site and compared against 2 independent masked reads of <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT images by nuclear medicine specialists to determine sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and the rate of detection of the primary site. <b>Results:</b> We identified 147 patients, 65% of whom had undergone molecular profiling. The median age at diagnosis was 61 y (range, 20-84 y), and the median follow-up time was 74 mo (range, 26-83 mo). Eighty-two percent were classified as having an unfavorable CUP subtype as per international guidelines.<sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT demonstrated a primary site detection rate of 41%, resulted in a change in management in 22%, and identified previously occult disease sites in 37%. Median OS was 16.8 mo for all patients and 104.7 and 12.1 mo for favorable and unfavorable CUP subtypes, respectively (<i>P</i> < 0.0001). Median OS in CUP patients when using <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT, clinicopathologic, and genomic information was 19.8 and 8.5 mo when a primary site was detected and not detected, respectively (<i>P</i> = 0.016). Multivariable analysis of survival adjusted for age and sex remained significant for identification of a potential primary site (<i>P</i> < 0.001), a favorable CUP (<i>P</i> < 0.001), and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group status of 1 or less (<i>P</i> < 0.001). <b>Conclusion:</b> <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT plays a complementary role in CUP diagnostic work-up and was able to determine the likely primary site in 41% of cases. OS is improved with primary site identification, demonstrating the value of access to diagnostic <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT for CUP patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94099,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1557-1563\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.123.267274\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.123.267274","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Evaluating the Utility of 18F-FDG PET/CT in Cancer of Unknown Primary.
Cancer of unknown primary (CUP) represents a heterogeneous group of metastatic tumors for which standardized diagnostic work-up fails to identify the primary site. We aimed to describe the Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre experience with 18F-FDG PET/CT in extracervical CUP with respect to detection of a primary site and its impact on management. A secondary aim was to compare overall survival (OS) in patients with and without a detected primary site. Methods: CUP patients treated between 2014 and 2020 were identified from medical oncology clinics and 18F-FDG PET/CT records. Information collated from electronic medical records included the suspected primary site and treatment details before and after 18F-FDG PET/CT. Clinicopathologic details and genomic analysis were used to determine the clinically suspected primary site and compared against 2 independent masked reads of 18F-FDG PET/CT images by nuclear medicine specialists to determine sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and the rate of detection of the primary site. Results: We identified 147 patients, 65% of whom had undergone molecular profiling. The median age at diagnosis was 61 y (range, 20-84 y), and the median follow-up time was 74 mo (range, 26-83 mo). Eighty-two percent were classified as having an unfavorable CUP subtype as per international guidelines.18F-FDG PET/CT demonstrated a primary site detection rate of 41%, resulted in a change in management in 22%, and identified previously occult disease sites in 37%. Median OS was 16.8 mo for all patients and 104.7 and 12.1 mo for favorable and unfavorable CUP subtypes, respectively (P < 0.0001). Median OS in CUP patients when using 18F-FDG PET/CT, clinicopathologic, and genomic information was 19.8 and 8.5 mo when a primary site was detected and not detected, respectively (P = 0.016). Multivariable analysis of survival adjusted for age and sex remained significant for identification of a potential primary site (P < 0.001), a favorable CUP (P < 0.001), and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group status of 1 or less (P < 0.001). Conclusion:18F-FDG PET/CT plays a complementary role in CUP diagnostic work-up and was able to determine the likely primary site in 41% of cases. OS is improved with primary site identification, demonstrating the value of access to diagnostic 18F-FDG PET/CT for CUP patients.