骨关节炎临床试验和荟萃分析中疼痛结果测量的循证等级体系

IF 7.2 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Osteoarthritis and Cartilage Pub Date : 2024-09-04 DOI:10.1016/j.joca.2024.08.013
Pakeezah Saadat, Tiago V. Pereira, Rahim Lalji, Henry D. Kiyomoto, Nicolas S. Bodmer, Pavlos Bobos, Samir Iskander, Areti-Angeliki Veroniki, Gillian A. Hawker, Alex J. Sutton, Peter Jüni, Bruno R. da Costa
{"title":"骨关节炎临床试验和荟萃分析中疼痛结果测量的循证等级体系","authors":"Pakeezah Saadat, Tiago V. Pereira, Rahim Lalji, Henry D. Kiyomoto, Nicolas S. Bodmer, Pavlos Bobos, Samir Iskander, Areti-Angeliki Veroniki, Gillian A. Hawker, Alex J. Sutton, Peter Jüni, Bruno R. da Costa","doi":"10.1016/j.joca.2024.08.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To rank commonly used patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for assessing pain in osteoarthritis trials according to their assay sensitivity, defined as the ability of a PROM to distinguish an effective from a less effective intervention or placebo, proposing a hierarchy for PROM selection in trials and data-extraction in meta-analyses. Analysis of trials with placebo, sham, or non-intervention control that included ≥100 patients per arm with knee/hip osteoarthritis, reporting treatment effects on ≥2 pain PROMs. Treatment effects from all PROMs were standardized on a 0–100 scale. Negative mean differences indicated a larger effect of the experimental treatment compared to control. We ranked PROMs by assay sensitivity using a Bayesian multi-outcome synthesis random-effects model. 135 trials comprising 57,141 participants were included. The ranking of PROMs from highest to lowest assay sensitivity was as follows: pain overall, pain on stairs, pain at night, pain on walking, pain at rest, WOMAC pain, WOMAC global, Lequesne index. Pain overall, the highest-ranked PROM, had a pooled mean difference of −6.96 (95%CrI −7.94, −6.02), while WOMAC pain, the most reported PROM in our study, had a pooled mean difference of −4.90 (95%CrI −5.55, −4.26). The pooled ratio of mean differences between pain overall and WOMAC pain was 1.42 (95%CrI 1.30, 1.55), representing a 42% larger effect size with pain overall. Pain overall has better assay sensitivity than other pain PROMs. Investigators should consider the hierarchy proposed in this study to guide PROM selection in osteoarthritis clinical trials and data extraction in osteoarthritis meta-analyses.","PeriodicalId":19654,"journal":{"name":"Osteoarthritis and Cartilage","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evidence-based hierarchy of pain outcome measures for osteoarthritis clinical trials and meta-analyses\",\"authors\":\"Pakeezah Saadat, Tiago V. Pereira, Rahim Lalji, Henry D. Kiyomoto, Nicolas S. Bodmer, Pavlos Bobos, Samir Iskander, Areti-Angeliki Veroniki, Gillian A. Hawker, Alex J. Sutton, Peter Jüni, Bruno R. da Costa\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.joca.2024.08.013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"To rank commonly used patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for assessing pain in osteoarthritis trials according to their assay sensitivity, defined as the ability of a PROM to distinguish an effective from a less effective intervention or placebo, proposing a hierarchy for PROM selection in trials and data-extraction in meta-analyses. Analysis of trials with placebo, sham, or non-intervention control that included ≥100 patients per arm with knee/hip osteoarthritis, reporting treatment effects on ≥2 pain PROMs. Treatment effects from all PROMs were standardized on a 0–100 scale. Negative mean differences indicated a larger effect of the experimental treatment compared to control. We ranked PROMs by assay sensitivity using a Bayesian multi-outcome synthesis random-effects model. 135 trials comprising 57,141 participants were included. The ranking of PROMs from highest to lowest assay sensitivity was as follows: pain overall, pain on stairs, pain at night, pain on walking, pain at rest, WOMAC pain, WOMAC global, Lequesne index. Pain overall, the highest-ranked PROM, had a pooled mean difference of −6.96 (95%CrI −7.94, −6.02), while WOMAC pain, the most reported PROM in our study, had a pooled mean difference of −4.90 (95%CrI −5.55, −4.26). The pooled ratio of mean differences between pain overall and WOMAC pain was 1.42 (95%CrI 1.30, 1.55), representing a 42% larger effect size with pain overall. Pain overall has better assay sensitivity than other pain PROMs. Investigators should consider the hierarchy proposed in this study to guide PROM selection in osteoarthritis clinical trials and data extraction in osteoarthritis meta-analyses.\",\"PeriodicalId\":19654,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Osteoarthritis and Cartilage\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Osteoarthritis and Cartilage\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2024.08.013\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Osteoarthritis and Cartilage","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2024.08.013","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

根据骨关节炎试验中评估疼痛的常用患者报告结局测量指标(PROM)的检测灵敏度(即 PROM 区分有效与无效干预或安慰剂的能力)对其进行排序,提出在试验中选择 PROM 和在荟萃分析中提取数据的分级方法。对安慰剂、假干预或非干预对照的试验进行分析,这些试验每臂包括≥100 名膝关节/髋关节骨关节炎患者,报告了≥2 个疼痛 PROMs 的治疗效果。所有 PROMs 的治疗效果均以 0-100 为标准。负的平均差表示实验治疗效果大于对照组。我们使用贝叶斯多结果综合随机效应模型,根据检测灵敏度对 PROM 进行了排序。共纳入 135 项试验,57141 名参与者。PROMs 检测灵敏度从高到低的排序如下:总体疼痛、上楼梯时疼痛、夜间疼痛、行走时疼痛、休息时疼痛、WOMAC 疼痛、WOMAC 全身疼痛、勒奎斯指数。总体疼痛是排名最高的 PROM,其集合平均差为-6.96(95%CrI -7.94,-6.02),而 WOMAC 疼痛是我们研究中报告最多的 PROM,其集合平均差为-4.90(95%CrI -5.55,-4.26)。总体疼痛与 WOMAC 疼痛之间的汇总平均差异比为 1.42 (95%CrI 1.30, 1.55),总体疼痛的效应大小比 WOMAC 疼痛大 42%。与其他疼痛 PROM 相比,总体疼痛的检测灵敏度更高。研究人员应考虑本研究提出的分级方法,以指导骨关节炎临床试验中PROM的选择和骨关节炎荟萃分析中的数据提取。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evidence-based hierarchy of pain outcome measures for osteoarthritis clinical trials and meta-analyses
To rank commonly used patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for assessing pain in osteoarthritis trials according to their assay sensitivity, defined as the ability of a PROM to distinguish an effective from a less effective intervention or placebo, proposing a hierarchy for PROM selection in trials and data-extraction in meta-analyses. Analysis of trials with placebo, sham, or non-intervention control that included ≥100 patients per arm with knee/hip osteoarthritis, reporting treatment effects on ≥2 pain PROMs. Treatment effects from all PROMs were standardized on a 0–100 scale. Negative mean differences indicated a larger effect of the experimental treatment compared to control. We ranked PROMs by assay sensitivity using a Bayesian multi-outcome synthesis random-effects model. 135 trials comprising 57,141 participants were included. The ranking of PROMs from highest to lowest assay sensitivity was as follows: pain overall, pain on stairs, pain at night, pain on walking, pain at rest, WOMAC pain, WOMAC global, Lequesne index. Pain overall, the highest-ranked PROM, had a pooled mean difference of −6.96 (95%CrI −7.94, −6.02), while WOMAC pain, the most reported PROM in our study, had a pooled mean difference of −4.90 (95%CrI −5.55, −4.26). The pooled ratio of mean differences between pain overall and WOMAC pain was 1.42 (95%CrI 1.30, 1.55), representing a 42% larger effect size with pain overall. Pain overall has better assay sensitivity than other pain PROMs. Investigators should consider the hierarchy proposed in this study to guide PROM selection in osteoarthritis clinical trials and data extraction in osteoarthritis meta-analyses.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Osteoarthritis and Cartilage
Osteoarthritis and Cartilage 医学-风湿病学
CiteScore
11.70
自引率
7.10%
发文量
802
审稿时长
52 days
期刊介绍: Osteoarthritis and Cartilage is the official journal of the Osteoarthritis Research Society International. It is an international, multidisciplinary journal that disseminates information for the many kinds of specialists and practitioners concerned with osteoarthritis.
期刊最新文献
Expression of Concern; Comparison of weight loss interventions in overweight and obese adults with knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized trials. PET-MRI: the promise of multi-tissue imaging of early disease mechanisms in osteoarthritis. The longitudinal association of hand osteoarthritis with paid and unpaid work restrictions and related societal costs: the Hand Osteoarthritis in Secondary Care cohort. Response to letter to the editor regarding 'Association between synovial tissue damage and pain in late-stage knee osteoarthritis: a cross-sectional study'. Osteoarthritis year in review 2024: Imaging.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1