2022-2023 年美国青少年电子烟用户样本中按种族/族裔分列的电子烟品牌使用情况。

IF 3 2区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Nicotine & Tobacco Research Pub Date : 2024-09-06 DOI:10.1093/ntr/ntae174
Jennifer M Kreslake, Adrian Bertrand, Tyler Minter, Barbara A Schillo
{"title":"2022-2023 年美国青少年电子烟用户样本中按种族/族裔分列的电子烟品牌使用情况。","authors":"Jennifer M Kreslake, Adrian Bertrand, Tyler Minter, Barbara A Schillo","doi":"10.1093/ntr/ntae174","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>To determine whether e-cigarette brand use varies according to race/ethnicity among adolescent and young adult e-cigarette users.</p><p><strong>Aims and methods: </strong>Data are from a cross-sectional online survey of respondents aged 15-24 years (January 2022-June 2023; 300 unique respondents/week). The analytic sample was restricted to current e-cigarette users (n = 6387). Respondents selected their usual brand and reported frequency of past 30-day e-cigarette use (in days). ANOVAs measured differences in frequency of use by usual brand, stratified by race/ethnicity. Linear regression identified changes in usual brand over time by race/ethnicity, controlling for age and use of other tobacco/nicotine products.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One-quarter (25.6%) of Black and 22.2% of Hispanic e-cigarette users reported JUUL as their usual brand, compared to those who are White (15.7%) or another race (16.5%). Puff Bar was the second-most reported brand among Black (15.1%) or Hispanic (16.6%) e-cigarette users, to a greater extent than White (7.8%) e-cigarette users. Frequency of use varied significantly according to respondents' usual brand when stratified by race/ethnicity (p < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Across all racial and ethnic categories, frequency of use was greater for brands marketed with more flavor options and containing nicotine (EB Design, SMOK, Hyde, and Vuse). Despite declines in popularity, Black or Hispanic respondents report using JUUL and Puff Bar to a greater extent than other respondents, and vape less frequently than White non-Hispanic respondents regardless of brand. As e-cigarette brands continue to proliferate, monitoring e-cigarette brand selection by race/ethnicity can inform studies of nicotine exposure, polyuse, and health disparities.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>Our study demonstrates the importance of research methods to detect rapidly changing patterns of e-cigarette use by race/ethnicity and age. The inclusion of measures capturing brand use can detect evidence of product features and targeted marketing that may have consequences for patterns of tobacco use and nicotine exposure among these groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":19241,"journal":{"name":"Nicotine & Tobacco Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"E-Cigarette Brand Use by Race/Ethnicity in a US Sample of Adolescent and Young Adult E-Cigarette Users, 2022-2023.\",\"authors\":\"Jennifer M Kreslake, Adrian Bertrand, Tyler Minter, Barbara A Schillo\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ntr/ntae174\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>To determine whether e-cigarette brand use varies according to race/ethnicity among adolescent and young adult e-cigarette users.</p><p><strong>Aims and methods: </strong>Data are from a cross-sectional online survey of respondents aged 15-24 years (January 2022-June 2023; 300 unique respondents/week). The analytic sample was restricted to current e-cigarette users (n = 6387). Respondents selected their usual brand and reported frequency of past 30-day e-cigarette use (in days). ANOVAs measured differences in frequency of use by usual brand, stratified by race/ethnicity. Linear regression identified changes in usual brand over time by race/ethnicity, controlling for age and use of other tobacco/nicotine products.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One-quarter (25.6%) of Black and 22.2% of Hispanic e-cigarette users reported JUUL as their usual brand, compared to those who are White (15.7%) or another race (16.5%). Puff Bar was the second-most reported brand among Black (15.1%) or Hispanic (16.6%) e-cigarette users, to a greater extent than White (7.8%) e-cigarette users. Frequency of use varied significantly according to respondents' usual brand when stratified by race/ethnicity (p < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Across all racial and ethnic categories, frequency of use was greater for brands marketed with more flavor options and containing nicotine (EB Design, SMOK, Hyde, and Vuse). Despite declines in popularity, Black or Hispanic respondents report using JUUL and Puff Bar to a greater extent than other respondents, and vape less frequently than White non-Hispanic respondents regardless of brand. As e-cigarette brands continue to proliferate, monitoring e-cigarette brand selection by race/ethnicity can inform studies of nicotine exposure, polyuse, and health disparities.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>Our study demonstrates the importance of research methods to detect rapidly changing patterns of e-cigarette use by race/ethnicity and age. The inclusion of measures capturing brand use can detect evidence of product features and targeted marketing that may have consequences for patterns of tobacco use and nicotine exposure among these groups.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19241,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nicotine & Tobacco Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nicotine & Tobacco Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntae174\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nicotine & Tobacco Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntae174","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言目的和方法:数据来自对 15-24 岁受访者的横断面在线调查(2022 年 1 月至 2023 年 6 月;每周 300 名独立受访者)。分析样本仅限于当前的电子烟用户(n = 6387)。受访者选择了常用品牌,并报告了过去 30 天使用电子烟的频率(天数)。方差分析测量了按种族/族裔分层的常用品牌使用频率的差异。线性回归确定了不同种族/族裔的常用品牌随时间的变化情况,同时控制了年龄和其他烟草/尼古丁产品的使用情况:结果:四分之一(25.6%)的黑人和 22.2% 的西班牙裔电子烟用户表示 JUUL 是他们的常用品牌,而白人(15.7%)或其他种族(16.5%)的用户则表示 JUUL 是他们的常用品牌。在黑人(15.1%)或西班牙裔(16.6%)电子烟用户中,"泡芙吧 "是第二多报告的品牌,高于白人(7.8%)电子烟用户。按种族/族裔分层时,受访者的常用品牌不同,使用频率也有很大差异(p 结论:受访者的常用品牌越多,使用频率越高:在所有种族和族裔类别中,使用频率较高的品牌有更多口味选择并含有尼古丁(EB Design、SMOK、Hyde 和 Vuse)。尽管受欢迎程度有所下降,但黑人或西班牙裔受访者对 JUUL 和 Puff Bar 的使用率仍高于其他受访者,而无论何种品牌,其使用频率均低于非西班牙裔白人受访者。随着电子烟品牌的不断涌现,监测种族/族裔对电子烟品牌的选择可以为尼古丁暴露、多用性和健康差异研究提供信息:我们的研究表明,研究方法对于检测按种族/族裔和年龄快速变化的电子烟使用模式非常重要。纳入品牌使用的测量方法可以发现产品特征和定向营销的证据,这些特征和定向营销可能会对这些群体的烟草使用和尼古丁暴露模式产生影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
E-Cigarette Brand Use by Race/Ethnicity in a US Sample of Adolescent and Young Adult E-Cigarette Users, 2022-2023.

Introduction: To determine whether e-cigarette brand use varies according to race/ethnicity among adolescent and young adult e-cigarette users.

Aims and methods: Data are from a cross-sectional online survey of respondents aged 15-24 years (January 2022-June 2023; 300 unique respondents/week). The analytic sample was restricted to current e-cigarette users (n = 6387). Respondents selected their usual brand and reported frequency of past 30-day e-cigarette use (in days). ANOVAs measured differences in frequency of use by usual brand, stratified by race/ethnicity. Linear regression identified changes in usual brand over time by race/ethnicity, controlling for age and use of other tobacco/nicotine products.

Results: One-quarter (25.6%) of Black and 22.2% of Hispanic e-cigarette users reported JUUL as their usual brand, compared to those who are White (15.7%) or another race (16.5%). Puff Bar was the second-most reported brand among Black (15.1%) or Hispanic (16.6%) e-cigarette users, to a greater extent than White (7.8%) e-cigarette users. Frequency of use varied significantly according to respondents' usual brand when stratified by race/ethnicity (p < .001).

Conclusions: Across all racial and ethnic categories, frequency of use was greater for brands marketed with more flavor options and containing nicotine (EB Design, SMOK, Hyde, and Vuse). Despite declines in popularity, Black or Hispanic respondents report using JUUL and Puff Bar to a greater extent than other respondents, and vape less frequently than White non-Hispanic respondents regardless of brand. As e-cigarette brands continue to proliferate, monitoring e-cigarette brand selection by race/ethnicity can inform studies of nicotine exposure, polyuse, and health disparities.

Implications: Our study demonstrates the importance of research methods to detect rapidly changing patterns of e-cigarette use by race/ethnicity and age. The inclusion of measures capturing brand use can detect evidence of product features and targeted marketing that may have consequences for patterns of tobacco use and nicotine exposure among these groups.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nicotine & Tobacco Research
Nicotine & Tobacco Research 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
10.60%
发文量
268
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Nicotine & Tobacco Research is one of the world''s few peer-reviewed journals devoted exclusively to the study of nicotine and tobacco. It aims to provide a forum for empirical findings, critical reviews, and conceptual papers on the many aspects of nicotine and tobacco, including research from the biobehavioral, neurobiological, molecular biologic, epidemiological, prevention, and treatment arenas. Along with manuscripts from each of the areas mentioned above, the editors encourage submissions that are integrative in nature and that cross traditional disciplinary boundaries. The journal is sponsored by the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco (SRNT). It publishes twelve times a year.
期刊最新文献
The Context of the Emergency Department as a Location for a Smoking Cessation Intervention-Process Evaluation Findings From the Cessation of Smoking Trial in the Emergency Department Trial. Behavioral Interventions for Tobacco Cessation in Low and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Effects of E-Cigarettes on Combustible Cigarette Smoking Among Adults with Opioid Use Disorder on Buprenorphine: Single Arm ERASER Pilot Trial. Vaping and smoking cue reactivity in young adult non-smoking electronic cigarette users: A functional neuroimaging study. Do-it-yourself flavored capsule cigarettes: Exploiting potential regulatory loopholes?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1