伏替西汀治疗重度抑郁症的基线认知与抑郁结果无关:来自安慰剂对照试验的研究结果。

IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Journal of Clinical Psychiatry Pub Date : 2024-09-04 DOI:10.4088/JCP.24m15295
Joshua T Jordan, Li Shen, Nicholas J Cooper, Samantha V Goncalves, Madhukar H Trivedi, Alan F Schatzberg, Wei Wu, Adam J Savitz, Amit Etkin
{"title":"伏替西汀治疗重度抑郁症的基线认知与抑郁结果无关:来自安慰剂对照试验的研究结果。","authors":"Joshua T Jordan, Li Shen, Nicholas J Cooper, Samantha V Goncalves, Madhukar H Trivedi, Alan F Schatzberg, Wei Wu, Adam J Savitz, Amit Etkin","doi":"10.4088/JCP.24m15295","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a common psychiatric disorder for which pharmacologic standard-of-care treatments have limited efficacy, particularly among individuals with cognitive dysfunction. Cognitive dysfunction is observed in approximately 25%-50% of those with MDD, wherein response to standard-of-care medications is reduced. Vortioxetine is an approved antidepressant that has shown evidence of procognitive effects in patients. It is not known if it has greater clinical efficacy in MDD patients with cognitive dysfunction, a more difficult to treat population, than other antidepressants.</p><p><p><b>Methods:</b> This study was a reanalysis of 1,812 subjects with MDD across 4 placebo controlled trials. Baseline cognition was measured by the Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST), the primary measure used to demonstrate vortioxetine's procognitive effects in clinical studies. Analyses examined whether baseline cognitive function was associated with differences in treatment outcomes.</p><p><p><b>Results:</b> Baseline DSST did not predict placebo-adjusted treatment effects of vortioxetine on depressive symptoms (pooled Cohen <i>d</i> = -0.02, 95% CI = -0.12 to 0.07). Analyses of additional cognitive measures similarly did not predict placebo-adjusted treatment effects on depression (all 95% CI contained zero). Finally, analyses of trials with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs)/serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) as active comparators also revealed no prediction of SSRI/SNRI adjusted treatment effects of vortioxetine on depression.</p><p><p><b>Conclusions:</b> These findings, taken together, suggest that cognitive function does not moderate depression outcomes in vortioxetine, with results comparable to other antidepressants.</p>","PeriodicalId":50234,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Psychiatry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Baseline Cognition Is Not Associated With Depression Outcomes in Vortioxetine for Major Depressive Disorder: Findings From Placebo-Controlled Trials.\",\"authors\":\"Joshua T Jordan, Li Shen, Nicholas J Cooper, Samantha V Goncalves, Madhukar H Trivedi, Alan F Schatzberg, Wei Wu, Adam J Savitz, Amit Etkin\",\"doi\":\"10.4088/JCP.24m15295\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a common psychiatric disorder for which pharmacologic standard-of-care treatments have limited efficacy, particularly among individuals with cognitive dysfunction. Cognitive dysfunction is observed in approximately 25%-50% of those with MDD, wherein response to standard-of-care medications is reduced. Vortioxetine is an approved antidepressant that has shown evidence of procognitive effects in patients. It is not known if it has greater clinical efficacy in MDD patients with cognitive dysfunction, a more difficult to treat population, than other antidepressants.</p><p><p><b>Methods:</b> This study was a reanalysis of 1,812 subjects with MDD across 4 placebo controlled trials. Baseline cognition was measured by the Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST), the primary measure used to demonstrate vortioxetine's procognitive effects in clinical studies. Analyses examined whether baseline cognitive function was associated with differences in treatment outcomes.</p><p><p><b>Results:</b> Baseline DSST did not predict placebo-adjusted treatment effects of vortioxetine on depressive symptoms (pooled Cohen <i>d</i> = -0.02, 95% CI = -0.12 to 0.07). Analyses of additional cognitive measures similarly did not predict placebo-adjusted treatment effects on depression (all 95% CI contained zero). Finally, analyses of trials with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs)/serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) as active comparators also revealed no prediction of SSRI/SNRI adjusted treatment effects of vortioxetine on depression.</p><p><p><b>Conclusions:</b> These findings, taken together, suggest that cognitive function does not moderate depression outcomes in vortioxetine, with results comparable to other antidepressants.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50234,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Psychiatry\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4088/JCP.24m15295\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4088/JCP.24m15295","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:重度抑郁障碍(MDD)是一种常见的精神疾病,药物标准治疗的疗效有限,尤其是对有认知功能障碍的患者。约25%-50%的重度抑郁症患者会出现认知功能障碍,从而降低了对标准药物治疗的反应。伏替西汀是一种已获批准的抗抑郁药,有证据表明它对患者有促进认知的作用。与其他抗抑郁药相比,沃替西汀对认知功能障碍的 MDD 患者(这类患者更难治疗)是否具有更高的临床疗效尚不清楚:本研究重新分析了 4 项安慰剂对照试验中的 1812 名 MDD 患者。基线认知能力通过数字符号替换测试(DSST)进行测量,DSST是临床研究中用于证明伏替西汀的前认知效应的主要测量方法。分析检验了基线认知功能是否与治疗结果的差异有关:结果:基线DSST并不能预测安慰剂调整后的伏替西汀对抑郁症状的治疗效果(汇总Cohen d = -0.02,95% CI = -0.12至0.07)。对其他认知测量指标的分析同样不能预测安慰剂调整后对抑郁症的治疗效果(95% CI 均为零)。最后,以选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(SSRIs)/5-羟色胺和去甲肾上腺素再摄取抑制剂(SNRIs)作为活性比较药的试验分析也显示,经SSRI/SNRI调整后,伏替西汀对抑郁症的治疗效果没有预测作用:这些研究结果表明,认知功能并不影响伏替西汀治疗抑郁症的效果,其效果与其他抗抑郁药物相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Baseline Cognition Is Not Associated With Depression Outcomes in Vortioxetine for Major Depressive Disorder: Findings From Placebo-Controlled Trials.

Objective: Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a common psychiatric disorder for which pharmacologic standard-of-care treatments have limited efficacy, particularly among individuals with cognitive dysfunction. Cognitive dysfunction is observed in approximately 25%-50% of those with MDD, wherein response to standard-of-care medications is reduced. Vortioxetine is an approved antidepressant that has shown evidence of procognitive effects in patients. It is not known if it has greater clinical efficacy in MDD patients with cognitive dysfunction, a more difficult to treat population, than other antidepressants.

Methods: This study was a reanalysis of 1,812 subjects with MDD across 4 placebo controlled trials. Baseline cognition was measured by the Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST), the primary measure used to demonstrate vortioxetine's procognitive effects in clinical studies. Analyses examined whether baseline cognitive function was associated with differences in treatment outcomes.

Results: Baseline DSST did not predict placebo-adjusted treatment effects of vortioxetine on depressive symptoms (pooled Cohen d = -0.02, 95% CI = -0.12 to 0.07). Analyses of additional cognitive measures similarly did not predict placebo-adjusted treatment effects on depression (all 95% CI contained zero). Finally, analyses of trials with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs)/serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) as active comparators also revealed no prediction of SSRI/SNRI adjusted treatment effects of vortioxetine on depression.

Conclusions: These findings, taken together, suggest that cognitive function does not moderate depression outcomes in vortioxetine, with results comparable to other antidepressants.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Psychiatry
Journal of Clinical Psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
1.90%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: For over 75 years, The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry has been a leading source of peer-reviewed articles offering the latest information on mental health topics to psychiatrists and other medical professionals.The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry is the leading psychiatric resource for clinical information and covers disorders including depression, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, anxiety, addiction, posttraumatic stress disorder, and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder while exploring the newest advances in diagnosis and treatment.
期刊最新文献
Efficacy and Safety of Ketamine/Esketamine in Bipolar Depression in a Clinical Setting. Integrating Previous Suicide Attempts, Gender, and Age Into Suicide Risk Assessment Using Advanced Artificial Intelligence Models. Long-Term Changes in Cognition Among Patients With Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorders and Different Durations of Illness: A Meta-Analysis. Regression: Understanding What Covariates and Confounds Do in Adjusted Analyses. Diagnostic Assessment via Live Telehealth (Phone or Video) Versus Face-to-Face for the Diagnoses of Psychiatric Conditions: A Systematic Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1