开发和验证可解释的机器学习模型,以预测哥伦比亚慢性肾病患者的肾小球滤过率。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY Annals of Clinical Biochemistry Pub Date : 2024-09-21 DOI:10.1177/00045632241285528
Luis H Rojas, Angela J Pereira-Morales, William Amador, Albert Montenegro, Walberto Buelvas, Víctor de la Espriella
{"title":"开发和验证可解释的机器学习模型,以预测哥伦比亚慢性肾病患者的肾小球滤过率。","authors":"Luis H Rojas, Angela J Pereira-Morales, William Amador, Albert Montenegro, Walberto Buelvas, Víctor de la Espriella","doi":"10.1177/00045632241285528","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>ML predictive models have shown their capability to improve risk prediction and assist medical decision-making, nevertheless, there is a lack of accuracy systems to early identify future rapid CKD progressors in Colombia and even in South America.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this study was to develop a series of interpretable machine learning models that predict GFR at 6-months, 9-months, and 12-months.</p><p><strong>Study design and setting: </strong>Over 29,000 CKD patients stage 1 to 3b (estimated GFR, <60 mL/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup>) with an average of 3-year follow-up data were included. We used the machine learning extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) to build three models to predict the next eGFR. Models were internally and externally validated. In addition, we included SHapley Additive exPlanation (SHAP) values to offer interpretable global and local prediction models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All models showed a good performance in development and external validation. However, the 6-months XGBoost prediction model showed the best performance in internal (MAE average = 6.07; RSME = 78.87), and in external validation (MAE average = 6.45, RSME = 18.94). The top 3 most influential features that pushed the predicted eGFR value to lower values were the interpolated values for eGFR and creatinine, and eGFR at baseline.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In the current study we have developed and validated machine learning models to predict the next eGFR value at different intervals. Furthermore, we attempted to approach the need for prediction explanation by offering transparent predictions.</p>","PeriodicalId":8005,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Clinical Biochemistry","volume":" ","pages":"45632241285528"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development and validation of interpretable machine learning models to predict glomerular filtration rate in chronic kidney disease Colombian patients.\",\"authors\":\"Luis H Rojas, Angela J Pereira-Morales, William Amador, Albert Montenegro, Walberto Buelvas, Víctor de la Espriella\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00045632241285528\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>ML predictive models have shown their capability to improve risk prediction and assist medical decision-making, nevertheless, there is a lack of accuracy systems to early identify future rapid CKD progressors in Colombia and even in South America.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this study was to develop a series of interpretable machine learning models that predict GFR at 6-months, 9-months, and 12-months.</p><p><strong>Study design and setting: </strong>Over 29,000 CKD patients stage 1 to 3b (estimated GFR, <60 mL/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup>) with an average of 3-year follow-up data were included. We used the machine learning extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) to build three models to predict the next eGFR. Models were internally and externally validated. In addition, we included SHapley Additive exPlanation (SHAP) values to offer interpretable global and local prediction models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All models showed a good performance in development and external validation. However, the 6-months XGBoost prediction model showed the best performance in internal (MAE average = 6.07; RSME = 78.87), and in external validation (MAE average = 6.45, RSME = 18.94). The top 3 most influential features that pushed the predicted eGFR value to lower values were the interpolated values for eGFR and creatinine, and eGFR at baseline.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In the current study we have developed and validated machine learning models to predict the next eGFR value at different intervals. Furthermore, we attempted to approach the need for prediction explanation by offering transparent predictions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8005,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Clinical Biochemistry\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"45632241285528\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Clinical Biochemistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00045632241285528\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Clinical Biochemistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00045632241285528","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:尽管如此,在哥伦比亚,甚至在南美洲,还缺乏早期识别未来快速 CKD 进展者的准确系统:本研究旨在开发一系列可解释的机器学习模型,预测 6 个月、9 个月和 12 个月的 GFR:29,000 多名 1 至 3b 期 CKD 患者(估算 GFR,结果:所有模型的开发都表现良好:所有模型在开发和外部验证中均表现良好。然而,6 个月 XGBoost 预测模型在内部(平均 MAE=6.07;RSME=78.87)和外部验证(平均 MAE=6.45;RSME=18.94)中表现最佳。将预测的 eGFR 值推向较低值的前 3 个最有影响力的特征是 eGFR 和肌酐的内插值以及基线时的 eGFR:在当前的研究中,我们开发并验证了机器学习模型,用于预测不同时间间隔的下一个 eGFR 值。此外,我们还试图通过提供透明的预测来满足对预测解释的需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Development and validation of interpretable machine learning models to predict glomerular filtration rate in chronic kidney disease Colombian patients.

Background: ML predictive models have shown their capability to improve risk prediction and assist medical decision-making, nevertheless, there is a lack of accuracy systems to early identify future rapid CKD progressors in Colombia and even in South America.

Objective: The purpose of this study was to develop a series of interpretable machine learning models that predict GFR at 6-months, 9-months, and 12-months.

Study design and setting: Over 29,000 CKD patients stage 1 to 3b (estimated GFR, <60 mL/min/1.73 m2) with an average of 3-year follow-up data were included. We used the machine learning extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) to build three models to predict the next eGFR. Models were internally and externally validated. In addition, we included SHapley Additive exPlanation (SHAP) values to offer interpretable global and local prediction models.

Results: All models showed a good performance in development and external validation. However, the 6-months XGBoost prediction model showed the best performance in internal (MAE average = 6.07; RSME = 78.87), and in external validation (MAE average = 6.45, RSME = 18.94). The top 3 most influential features that pushed the predicted eGFR value to lower values were the interpolated values for eGFR and creatinine, and eGFR at baseline.

Conclusion: In the current study we have developed and validated machine learning models to predict the next eGFR value at different intervals. Furthermore, we attempted to approach the need for prediction explanation by offering transparent predictions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Clinical Biochemistry
Annals of Clinical Biochemistry Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Clinical Biochemistry
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
4.50%
发文量
61
期刊介绍: Annals of Clinical Biochemistry is the fully peer reviewed international journal of the Association for Clinical Biochemistry and Laboratory Medicine. Annals of Clinical Biochemistry accepts papers that contribute to knowledge in all fields of laboratory medicine, especially those pertaining to the understanding, diagnosis and treatment of human disease. It publishes papers on clinical biochemistry, clinical audit, metabolic medicine, immunology, genetics, biotechnology, haematology, microbiology, computing and management where they have both biochemical and clinical relevance. Papers describing evaluation or implementation of commercial reagent kits or the performance of new analysers require substantial original information. Unless of exceptional interest and novelty, studies dealing with the redox status in various diseases are not generally considered within the journal''s scope. Studies documenting the association of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) with particular phenotypes will not normally be considered, given the greater strength of genome wide association studies (GWAS). Research undertaken in non-human animals will not be considered for publication in the Annals. Annals of Clinical Biochemistry is also the official journal of NVKC (de Nederlandse Vereniging voor Klinische Chemie) and JSCC (Japan Society of Clinical Chemistry).
期刊最新文献
Exploratory Study on Reference Intervals of Calprotectin and Pentraxin 3. Coefficients of variation analyses of internal quality control status for blood lead in China from 2015 to 2023. The effects of controlled acute psychological stress on serum cortisol and plasma metanephrine concentrations in healthy subjects. Suggested guide to using lactate gap as a surrogate marker in the diagnosis of ethylene glycol overdose. Simultaneous quantification of serum symmetric dimethylarginine, asymmetric dimethylarginine and creatinine for use in a routine clinical laboratory.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1