费城染色体阳性慢性髓性白血病 T315I 突变和非 T315I 突变患者服用阿西米尼的剂量理由。

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Clinical Pharmacokinetics Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-07 DOI:10.1007/s40262-024-01411-1
Francois Pierre Combes, Sherwin K B Sy, Ying Fei Li, Sebastien Lorenzo, Kohinoor Dasgupta, Shruti Kapoor, Matthias Hoch, Yu-Yun Ho
{"title":"费城染色体阳性慢性髓性白血病 T315I 突变和非 T315I 突变患者服用阿西米尼的剂量理由。","authors":"Francois Pierre Combes, Sherwin K B Sy, Ying Fei Li, Sebastien Lorenzo, Kohinoor Dasgupta, Shruti Kapoor, Matthias Hoch, Yu-Yun Ho","doi":"10.1007/s40262-024-01411-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Asciminib is approved in patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase (Ph+ CML-CP) treated with ≥ 2 prior tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Here, we aimed to demonstrate similarity in efficacy/safety of asciminib 80 mg once daily (q.d.) versus 40 mg twice daily (b.i.d.) in patients with CML-CP without T315I mutation and support the use of the 200-mg b.i.d. dosage in patients harboring T315I, using model-informed drug development.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were collected from 199 patients in the phase I (NCT02081378; 10-200 mg b.i.d. or 10-400 mg q.d.) and 154 patients in the phase III (NCT03106779; 40 mg b.i.d.) studies. Evaluations were based on population pharmacokinetics (PopPK) and exposure-response (efficacy/safety) analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>PopPK showed comparable exposure (area under the curve, AUC<sub>0-24h</sub>) for 40 mg b.i.d. and 80 mg q.d. (12,638 vs 12,646 ng*h/mL); average maximum and minimum plasma concentrations for 80 mg q.d. were 1.61- and 0.72-fold those of 40 mg b.i.d., respectively. Exposure-response analyses predicted similar major molecular response rates for 40 mg b.i.d. and 80 mg q.d. (Week 24: 27.6% vs 24.8%; Week 48: 32.3% vs 30.6%). Results also established adequacy of 200 mg b.i.d. in patients with T315I mutation (Week 24: 20.7%; Week 48: 23.7%), along with a similar safety profile for all dose regimens.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Similarity between 40 mg b.i.d. and 80 mg q.d. regimens was investigated, demonstrating similar and substantial efficacy with well-tolerated safety in patients without T315I mutation. The 200-mg b.i.d. dose was deemed safe and effective for patients with T315I mutation.</p>","PeriodicalId":10405,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pharmacokinetics","volume":" ","pages":"1301-1312"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11450061/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dose Justification for Asciminib in Patients with Philadelphia Chromosome-Positive Chronic Myeloid Leukemia with and Without the T315I Mutation.\",\"authors\":\"Francois Pierre Combes, Sherwin K B Sy, Ying Fei Li, Sebastien Lorenzo, Kohinoor Dasgupta, Shruti Kapoor, Matthias Hoch, Yu-Yun Ho\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40262-024-01411-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Asciminib is approved in patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase (Ph+ CML-CP) treated with ≥ 2 prior tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Here, we aimed to demonstrate similarity in efficacy/safety of asciminib 80 mg once daily (q.d.) versus 40 mg twice daily (b.i.d.) in patients with CML-CP without T315I mutation and support the use of the 200-mg b.i.d. dosage in patients harboring T315I, using model-informed drug development.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were collected from 199 patients in the phase I (NCT02081378; 10-200 mg b.i.d. or 10-400 mg q.d.) and 154 patients in the phase III (NCT03106779; 40 mg b.i.d.) studies. Evaluations were based on population pharmacokinetics (PopPK) and exposure-response (efficacy/safety) analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>PopPK showed comparable exposure (area under the curve, AUC<sub>0-24h</sub>) for 40 mg b.i.d. and 80 mg q.d. (12,638 vs 12,646 ng*h/mL); average maximum and minimum plasma concentrations for 80 mg q.d. were 1.61- and 0.72-fold those of 40 mg b.i.d., respectively. Exposure-response analyses predicted similar major molecular response rates for 40 mg b.i.d. and 80 mg q.d. (Week 24: 27.6% vs 24.8%; Week 48: 32.3% vs 30.6%). Results also established adequacy of 200 mg b.i.d. in patients with T315I mutation (Week 24: 20.7%; Week 48: 23.7%), along with a similar safety profile for all dose regimens.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Similarity between 40 mg b.i.d. and 80 mg q.d. regimens was investigated, demonstrating similar and substantial efficacy with well-tolerated safety in patients without T315I mutation. The 200-mg b.i.d. dose was deemed safe and effective for patients with T315I mutation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10405,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Pharmacokinetics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1301-1312\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11450061/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Pharmacokinetics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40262-024-01411-1\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/7 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Pharmacokinetics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40262-024-01411-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的阿昔米尼被批准用于既往接受过≥2种酪氨酸激酶抑制剂治疗的费城染色体阳性慢性髓性白血病慢性期(Ph+ CML-CP)患者。在这里,我们的目的是证明在没有 T315I 突变的 CML-CP 患者中,每天一次(q.d.)80 毫克的 asciminib 与每天两次(b.i.d.)40 毫克的 asciminib 在疗效/安全性方面的相似性,并支持在携带 T315I 的患者中使用 200 毫克的 b.i.d. 剂量,同时采用以模型为依据的药物开发方法:从 I 期研究(NCT02081378;10-200 毫克 b.i.d. 或 10-400 毫克 q.d.)的 199 名患者和 III 期研究(NCT03106779;40 毫克 b.i.d.)的 154 名患者中收集了数据。评估基于群体药代动力学(PopPK)和暴露-反应(疗效/安全性)分析:PopPK显示,40 mg b.i.d.和80 mg q.d.的暴露量(曲线下面积,AUC0-24h)相当(12,638 vs 12,646纳克*h/毫升);80 mg q.d.的平均最大和最小血浆浓度分别是40 mg b.i.d.的1.61倍和0.72倍。根据暴露-反应分析预测,40 毫克每天两次和 80 毫克每次的主要分子反应率相似(第 24 周:27.6% 对 24.8%;第 48 周:32.3% 对 30.6%)。研究结果还证实,在T315I基因突变的患者中,200毫克b.i.d.的剂量也足够(第24周:20.7%;第48周:23.7%),而且所有剂量方案的安全性相似:研究发现,40 毫克口服和 80 毫克 q.d. 两种方案的疗效相似,对无 T315I 突变的患者具有相似的实质性疗效和良好的耐受性。对于 T315I 基因突变的患者,200 毫克 b.i.d. 剂量被认为是安全有效的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Dose Justification for Asciminib in Patients with Philadelphia Chromosome-Positive Chronic Myeloid Leukemia with and Without the T315I Mutation.

Background and objective: Asciminib is approved in patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase (Ph+ CML-CP) treated with ≥ 2 prior tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Here, we aimed to demonstrate similarity in efficacy/safety of asciminib 80 mg once daily (q.d.) versus 40 mg twice daily (b.i.d.) in patients with CML-CP without T315I mutation and support the use of the 200-mg b.i.d. dosage in patients harboring T315I, using model-informed drug development.

Methods: Data were collected from 199 patients in the phase I (NCT02081378; 10-200 mg b.i.d. or 10-400 mg q.d.) and 154 patients in the phase III (NCT03106779; 40 mg b.i.d.) studies. Evaluations were based on population pharmacokinetics (PopPK) and exposure-response (efficacy/safety) analyses.

Results: PopPK showed comparable exposure (area under the curve, AUC0-24h) for 40 mg b.i.d. and 80 mg q.d. (12,638 vs 12,646 ng*h/mL); average maximum and minimum plasma concentrations for 80 mg q.d. were 1.61- and 0.72-fold those of 40 mg b.i.d., respectively. Exposure-response analyses predicted similar major molecular response rates for 40 mg b.i.d. and 80 mg q.d. (Week 24: 27.6% vs 24.8%; Week 48: 32.3% vs 30.6%). Results also established adequacy of 200 mg b.i.d. in patients with T315I mutation (Week 24: 20.7%; Week 48: 23.7%), along with a similar safety profile for all dose regimens.

Conclusions: Similarity between 40 mg b.i.d. and 80 mg q.d. regimens was investigated, demonstrating similar and substantial efficacy with well-tolerated safety in patients without T315I mutation. The 200-mg b.i.d. dose was deemed safe and effective for patients with T315I mutation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
4.40%
发文量
86
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Pharmacokinetics promotes the continuing development of clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics for the improvement of drug therapy, and for furthering postgraduate education in clinical pharmacology and therapeutics. Pharmacokinetics, the study of drug disposition in the body, is an integral part of drug development and rational use. Knowledge and application of pharmacokinetic principles leads to accelerated drug development, cost effective drug use and a reduced frequency of adverse effects and drug interactions.
期刊最新文献
SGLT2 Inhibitors in Patients with Heart Failure: A Model-Based Meta-Analysis. Population Pharmacokinetics of Intravenous Paracetamol and Its Metabolites in Extreme Preterm Neonates in the Context of Patent Ductus Arteriosus Treatment. Population Pharmacokinetics of Ensitrelvir in Healthy Participants and Participants with SARS-CoV-2 Infection in the SCORPIO-SR Study. Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Remdesivir in Phase I Participants with Varying Degrees of Renal Impairment. A Population Pharmacokinetic Study to Evaluate Doxorubicin Exposure Across All Age Groups.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1