护理点超声波对疑似肘关节牵拉有什么作用?单中心病例系列。

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS Journal of paediatrics and child health Pub Date : 2024-09-07 DOI:10.1111/jpc.16659
David J McCreary, Nikhil Tambe, Niall Mullen
{"title":"护理点超声波对疑似肘关节牵拉有什么作用?单中心病例系列。","authors":"David J McCreary, Nikhil Tambe, Niall Mullen","doi":"10.1111/jpc.16659","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Radial head subluxation, known as pulled elbow or nursemaid's elbow, is a common presentation to the Paediatric Emergency Department (PED). Fifty per cent of children present following an unwitnessed injury or with an atypical history. Furthermore, examination can be difficult in an upset or frightened child meaning the precise location of the injury is not always easily identifiable. Many children receive upper limb x-rays unnecessarily and others undergo attempted reduction for suspected pulled elbow when a fracture is the cause of their pain.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the ability of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) to correctly identify cases of suspected pulled elbow.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review of patients aged 0-5 years presenting to the PED of our large District General Hospital from November 2020 to November 2022. We reviewed the electronic medical records of all patients presenting with a triage category of 'elbow Injury'. We excluded patients presenting with obvious deformity, significant swelling and history of road traffic collision or other major trauma mechanism such as a fall from a height. POCUS was carried out by the authors according to pre-existing clinical protocols.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-seven patients underwent POCUS. Twenty-nine had a typical history and all had a positive POCUS for pulled elbow. Of the remaining eight patients with an atypical history, three were found to have a positive POCUS compared to unaffected elbow. Five patients with an atypical history had negative POCUS findings and were diagnosed as soft tissue injuries after further assessment. All 32 with positive sonographic signs had a final diagnosis of pulled elbow, meaning the specificity was 100% (47.8-100) (P = 0.00003). The sensitivity was 100%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Use of POCUS by appropriately trained clinicians, as an extension of a clinical examination, in this retrospective study reliably confirmed pulled elbow. This has the potential to reduce both unnecessary radiation as well as the time in the emergency department for the child and their carers.</p>","PeriodicalId":16648,"journal":{"name":"Journal of paediatrics and child health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What is the utility of point-of-care ultrasound for suspected pulled elbow? A single-centre case series.\",\"authors\":\"David J McCreary, Nikhil Tambe, Niall Mullen\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jpc.16659\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Radial head subluxation, known as pulled elbow or nursemaid's elbow, is a common presentation to the Paediatric Emergency Department (PED). Fifty per cent of children present following an unwitnessed injury or with an atypical history. Furthermore, examination can be difficult in an upset or frightened child meaning the precise location of the injury is not always easily identifiable. Many children receive upper limb x-rays unnecessarily and others undergo attempted reduction for suspected pulled elbow when a fracture is the cause of their pain.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the ability of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) to correctly identify cases of suspected pulled elbow.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review of patients aged 0-5 years presenting to the PED of our large District General Hospital from November 2020 to November 2022. We reviewed the electronic medical records of all patients presenting with a triage category of 'elbow Injury'. We excluded patients presenting with obvious deformity, significant swelling and history of road traffic collision or other major trauma mechanism such as a fall from a height. POCUS was carried out by the authors according to pre-existing clinical protocols.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-seven patients underwent POCUS. Twenty-nine had a typical history and all had a positive POCUS for pulled elbow. Of the remaining eight patients with an atypical history, three were found to have a positive POCUS compared to unaffected elbow. Five patients with an atypical history had negative POCUS findings and were diagnosed as soft tissue injuries after further assessment. All 32 with positive sonographic signs had a final diagnosis of pulled elbow, meaning the specificity was 100% (47.8-100) (P = 0.00003). The sensitivity was 100%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Use of POCUS by appropriately trained clinicians, as an extension of a clinical examination, in this retrospective study reliably confirmed pulled elbow. This has the potential to reduce both unnecessary radiation as well as the time in the emergency department for the child and their carers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16648,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of paediatrics and child health\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of paediatrics and child health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jpc.16659\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of paediatrics and child health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jpc.16659","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

桡骨头脱位,又称牵拉肘或护士肘,是儿科急诊室(PED)的常见病。50%的患儿是在未经目击的情况下受伤或病史不典型。此外,在患儿情绪不安或受到惊吓时,检查可能会比较困难,这意味着受伤的确切位置并不总是很容易辨认。许多儿童在不必要的情况下接受了上肢X光检查,还有一些儿童在怀疑肘关节牵拉的情况下接受了试图复位的手术,而骨折才是他们疼痛的原因:评估护理点超声(POCUS)正确识别疑似肘关节牵拉病例的能力:回顾性分析 2020 年 11 月至 2022 年 11 月期间在本地区大型综合医院 PED 就诊的 0-5 岁患者。我们查阅了分诊类别为 "肘部损伤 "的所有患者的电子病历。我们排除了有明显畸形、明显肿胀、道路交通碰撞或其他重大创伤病史(如高处坠落)的患者。POCUS由作者根据已有的临床方案进行:结果:37 名患者接受了 POCUS 检查。结果:37 名患者接受了 POCUS 检查,其中 29 人有典型病史,所有患者的肘关节牵拉 POCUS 检查结果均为阳性。在其余 8 位病史不典型的患者中,有 3 位与未受影响的肘部相比,POCUS 呈阳性。五名病史不典型的患者的 POCUS 结果为阴性,经进一步评估后被诊断为软组织损伤。所有 32 例声学征象阳性的患者最终诊断为肘关节牵拉,这意味着特异性为 100%(47.8-100)(P = 0.00003)。灵敏度为 100%:结论:在这项回顾性研究中,经过适当培训的临床医生使用 POCUS 作为临床检查的延伸,可以可靠地确诊肘关节牵拉。这有可能减少不必要的辐射,并缩短患儿及其护理人员在急诊科的就诊时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
What is the utility of point-of-care ultrasound for suspected pulled elbow? A single-centre case series.

Radial head subluxation, known as pulled elbow or nursemaid's elbow, is a common presentation to the Paediatric Emergency Department (PED). Fifty per cent of children present following an unwitnessed injury or with an atypical history. Furthermore, examination can be difficult in an upset or frightened child meaning the precise location of the injury is not always easily identifiable. Many children receive upper limb x-rays unnecessarily and others undergo attempted reduction for suspected pulled elbow when a fracture is the cause of their pain.

Objective: To evaluate the ability of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) to correctly identify cases of suspected pulled elbow.

Methods: A retrospective review of patients aged 0-5 years presenting to the PED of our large District General Hospital from November 2020 to November 2022. We reviewed the electronic medical records of all patients presenting with a triage category of 'elbow Injury'. We excluded patients presenting with obvious deformity, significant swelling and history of road traffic collision or other major trauma mechanism such as a fall from a height. POCUS was carried out by the authors according to pre-existing clinical protocols.

Results: Thirty-seven patients underwent POCUS. Twenty-nine had a typical history and all had a positive POCUS for pulled elbow. Of the remaining eight patients with an atypical history, three were found to have a positive POCUS compared to unaffected elbow. Five patients with an atypical history had negative POCUS findings and were diagnosed as soft tissue injuries after further assessment. All 32 with positive sonographic signs had a final diagnosis of pulled elbow, meaning the specificity was 100% (47.8-100) (P = 0.00003). The sensitivity was 100%.

Conclusion: Use of POCUS by appropriately trained clinicians, as an extension of a clinical examination, in this retrospective study reliably confirmed pulled elbow. This has the potential to reduce both unnecessary radiation as well as the time in the emergency department for the child and their carers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.90%
发文量
487
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health publishes original research articles of scientific excellence in paediatrics and child health. Research Articles, Case Reports and Letters to the Editor are published, together with invited Reviews, Annotations, Editorial Comments and manuscripts of educational interest.
期刊最新文献
Paediatric oral and maxillofacial biopsies: A retrospective institutional archival study. Letter to the Editor. Long-term outcomes and quality of life in congenital diaphragmatic hernia survivors treated with extracorporeal life support: A cross-sectional survey. Antenatal counselling at the cusp of viability and parental decision-making in the zone of parental discretion: A cohort study. A case of thyroid storm in a child associated with transient central diabetes insipidus.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1