在抗纤维化疗法时代,52 基因风险评分在识别有更高死亡风险的特发性肺纤维化患者方面的实用性。

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM Lung Pub Date : 2024-09-06 DOI:10.1007/s00408-024-00742-x
Julia F Söllner, Stefan Bentink, Christian Hesslinger, Thomas B Leonard, Megan L Neely, Nina M Patel, Thomas Schlange, Jamie L Todd, Richard Vinisko, Margaret L Salisbury
{"title":"在抗纤维化疗法时代,52 基因风险评分在识别有更高死亡风险的特发性肺纤维化患者方面的实用性。","authors":"Julia F Söllner, Stefan Bentink, Christian Hesslinger, Thomas B Leonard, Megan L Neely, Nina M Patel, Thomas Schlange, Jamie L Todd, Richard Vinisko, Margaret L Salisbury","doi":"10.1007/s00408-024-00742-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We investigated whether a 52-gene signature was associated with transplant-free survival and other clinically meaningful outcomes in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) in the IPF-PRO Registry, which enrolled patients who were and were not taking antifibrotic therapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The 52-gene risk signature was implemented to classify patients as being at \"high risk\" or \"low risk\" of disease progression and mortality. Transplant-free survival and other outcomes were compared between patients with a low-risk versus high-risk signature.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 52-gene signature classified 159 patients as at low risk and 86 as at high risk; in these groups, respectively, 56.6% and 51.2% used antifibrotic therapy at enrollment. Among those taking antifibrotic therapy, patients with a low-risk versus high-risk signature were at decreased risk of death, a composite of lung transplant or death, and a composite of decline in DLco % predicted > 15%, lung transplant, or death. Similar results were observed in the overall cohort.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These data suggest that the 52-gene signature can be used in patients with IPF treated with antifibrotic therapy to distinguish patients at higher risk of disease progression and mortality.</p>","PeriodicalId":18163,"journal":{"name":"Lung","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Utility of the 52-Gene Risk Score to Identify Patients with Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis at Greater Risk of Mortality in the Era of Antifibrotic Therapy.\",\"authors\":\"Julia F Söllner, Stefan Bentink, Christian Hesslinger, Thomas B Leonard, Megan L Neely, Nina M Patel, Thomas Schlange, Jamie L Todd, Richard Vinisko, Margaret L Salisbury\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00408-024-00742-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We investigated whether a 52-gene signature was associated with transplant-free survival and other clinically meaningful outcomes in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) in the IPF-PRO Registry, which enrolled patients who were and were not taking antifibrotic therapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The 52-gene risk signature was implemented to classify patients as being at \\\"high risk\\\" or \\\"low risk\\\" of disease progression and mortality. Transplant-free survival and other outcomes were compared between patients with a low-risk versus high-risk signature.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 52-gene signature classified 159 patients as at low risk and 86 as at high risk; in these groups, respectively, 56.6% and 51.2% used antifibrotic therapy at enrollment. Among those taking antifibrotic therapy, patients with a low-risk versus high-risk signature were at decreased risk of death, a composite of lung transplant or death, and a composite of decline in DLco % predicted > 15%, lung transplant, or death. Similar results were observed in the overall cohort.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These data suggest that the 52-gene signature can be used in patients with IPF treated with antifibrotic therapy to distinguish patients at higher risk of disease progression and mortality.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18163,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Lung\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Lung\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00408-024-00742-x\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lung","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00408-024-00742-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:我们研究了 52 个基因风险特征是否与特发性肺纤维化(IPF)患者的无移植生存期和其他有临床意义的结果有关:方法:采用 52 个基因风险特征对患者进行疾病进展和死亡率 "高风险 "或 "低风险 "分类。比较了低风险和高风险患者的无移植生存期和其他结果:52个基因特征将159名患者划分为低风险,将86名患者划分为高风险;在这两组患者中,分别有56.6%和51.2%的患者在入组时使用了抗纤维化疗法。在接受抗纤维化治疗的患者中,低风险与高风险特征的患者死亡风险、肺移植或死亡的复合风险以及DLco预测百分比下降>15%、肺移植或死亡的复合风险均有所降低。在整个队列中也观察到了类似的结果:这些数据表明,52 个基因特征可用于接受抗纤维化治疗的 IPF 患者,以区分疾病进展和死亡风险较高的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Utility of the 52-Gene Risk Score to Identify Patients with Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis at Greater Risk of Mortality in the Era of Antifibrotic Therapy.

Purpose: We investigated whether a 52-gene signature was associated with transplant-free survival and other clinically meaningful outcomes in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) in the IPF-PRO Registry, which enrolled patients who were and were not taking antifibrotic therapy.

Methods: The 52-gene risk signature was implemented to classify patients as being at "high risk" or "low risk" of disease progression and mortality. Transplant-free survival and other outcomes were compared between patients with a low-risk versus high-risk signature.

Results: The 52-gene signature classified 159 patients as at low risk and 86 as at high risk; in these groups, respectively, 56.6% and 51.2% used antifibrotic therapy at enrollment. Among those taking antifibrotic therapy, patients with a low-risk versus high-risk signature were at decreased risk of death, a composite of lung transplant or death, and a composite of decline in DLco % predicted > 15%, lung transplant, or death. Similar results were observed in the overall cohort.

Conclusions: These data suggest that the 52-gene signature can be used in patients with IPF treated with antifibrotic therapy to distinguish patients at higher risk of disease progression and mortality.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Lung
Lung 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
10.00%
发文量
95
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Lung publishes original articles, reviews and editorials on all aspects of the healthy and diseased lungs, of the airways, and of breathing. Epidemiological, clinical, pathophysiological, biochemical, and pharmacological studies fall within the scope of the journal. Case reports, short communications and technical notes can be accepted if they are of particular interest.
期刊最新文献
The Effects of Diabetes on Gas Transfer Capacity, Lung Volumes, Muscle Strength, and Cardio-pulmonary Responses During Exercise Novel Therapeutic Target for ALI/ARDS: Forkhead Box Transcription Factors Utility of the 52-Gene Risk Score to Identify Patients with Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis at Greater Risk of Mortality in the Era of Antifibrotic Therapy. Increased Pneumonia Risk Associated with Concomitant Use of Inhaled Corticosteroids and Benzodiazepines: A Pharmacovigilance Analysis. Exhaled Volatile Organic Compounds Detection in Pneumonia Screening: A Comprehensive Meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1