在产前教育中纳入分娩和生产的辅助医疗技术,以降低初产妇的硬膜外麻醉率:随机对照试验。

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING Midwifery Pub Date : 2024-08-30 DOI:10.1016/j.midw.2024.104170
Julie-Anne Fleet , Pamela Adelson , Lois McKellar , Mary Steen
{"title":"在产前教育中纳入分娩和生产的辅助医疗技术,以降低初产妇的硬膜外麻醉率:随机对照试验。","authors":"Julie-Anne Fleet ,&nbsp;Pamela Adelson ,&nbsp;Lois McKellar ,&nbsp;Mary Steen","doi":"10.1016/j.midw.2024.104170","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Problem</h3><p>Globally medical management of labour and birth has significantly increased, with epidurals attributed to the cascade of interventions.</p></div><div><h3>Background</h3><p>There are few randomised control trials that evaluate the effectiveness of antenatal education programs. A previous trial at two Australian hospitals found an antenatal program of integrative complementary therapies significantly reduced rates of interventions for low-risk primiparous women.</p></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><p>To reduce rates of intervention in labour and birth, with a primary outcome of decreased epidural use during labour.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Low to moderate risk primiparous women were randomised at 24–36 weeks’ gestation to the intervention group and standard care, or standard care alone. Clinical and psychological measures were analysed by intention-to-treat. Trial registration ACTRN12618001353280</p></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><p>In total, 178 women participated (<em>n</em> = 88 intervention, <em>n</em> = 90 Standard care), demographic characteristics were similar between groups, almost half (49 %) reported a pre-existing medical condition, and wellbeing scores fell within the average range. Epidural use was lower in the intervention group (47.7% vs 56.7 %) with higher rates of vaginal birth (52.3% vs 42.2 %), however, no statistical differences for birth outcomes were found between groups. Attitude to childbirth scores were statistically higher for women who attended the intervention (59.1 vs 54.3 p00.001).</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>Higher psychometric scores demonstrated women in the intervention group felt an increased sense of coping and control. Antenatal education that includes complementary therapies can reduce fear and improve attitudes about childbirth.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Replicating study protocols enabled the generalisability of findings to a more diverse group of women, and data will contribute to a larger meta-analysis design to detect smaller treatment effects for operative birth.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":18495,"journal":{"name":"Midwifery","volume":"139 ","pages":"Article 104170"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0266613824002535/pdfft?md5=b5267eb59d1a43a23154d297c548f828&pid=1-s2.0-S0266613824002535-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Antenatal education incorporating complementary medicine techniques for labour and birth to reduce the rates of epidural in primiparous women: A randomised control trial\",\"authors\":\"Julie-Anne Fleet ,&nbsp;Pamela Adelson ,&nbsp;Lois McKellar ,&nbsp;Mary Steen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.midw.2024.104170\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Problem</h3><p>Globally medical management of labour and birth has significantly increased, with epidurals attributed to the cascade of interventions.</p></div><div><h3>Background</h3><p>There are few randomised control trials that evaluate the effectiveness of antenatal education programs. A previous trial at two Australian hospitals found an antenatal program of integrative complementary therapies significantly reduced rates of interventions for low-risk primiparous women.</p></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><p>To reduce rates of intervention in labour and birth, with a primary outcome of decreased epidural use during labour.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Low to moderate risk primiparous women were randomised at 24–36 weeks’ gestation to the intervention group and standard care, or standard care alone. Clinical and psychological measures were analysed by intention-to-treat. Trial registration ACTRN12618001353280</p></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><p>In total, 178 women participated (<em>n</em> = 88 intervention, <em>n</em> = 90 Standard care), demographic characteristics were similar between groups, almost half (49 %) reported a pre-existing medical condition, and wellbeing scores fell within the average range. Epidural use was lower in the intervention group (47.7% vs 56.7 %) with higher rates of vaginal birth (52.3% vs 42.2 %), however, no statistical differences for birth outcomes were found between groups. Attitude to childbirth scores were statistically higher for women who attended the intervention (59.1 vs 54.3 p00.001).</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>Higher psychometric scores demonstrated women in the intervention group felt an increased sense of coping and control. Antenatal education that includes complementary therapies can reduce fear and improve attitudes about childbirth.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Replicating study protocols enabled the generalisability of findings to a more diverse group of women, and data will contribute to a larger meta-analysis design to detect smaller treatment effects for operative birth.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18495,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Midwifery\",\"volume\":\"139 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104170\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0266613824002535/pdfft?md5=b5267eb59d1a43a23154d297c548f828&pid=1-s2.0-S0266613824002535-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Midwifery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0266613824002535\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Midwifery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0266613824002535","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

问题:在全球范围内,对分娩和生产的医疗管理大幅增加,其中硬膜外麻醉是一系列干预措施中的一项:评估产前教育计划有效性的随机对照试验很少。之前在澳大利亚两家医院进行的一项试验发现,产前综合辅助疗法项目可显著降低低风险初产妇的干预率。目的:降低分娩和生产干预率,主要结果是减少分娩过程中硬膜外麻醉的使用:方法:低至中度风险的初产妇在妊娠 24-36 周时被随机分配到干预组和标准护理组,或仅分配到标准护理组。对临床和心理测量结果进行意向治疗分析。试验注册 ACTRN12618001353280 结果:共有 178 名妇女参加了试验(n = 88 名干预组,n = 90 名标准护理组),各组之间的人口统计学特征相似,近一半(49%)的妇女报告了既往病史,健康评分在平均范围内。干预组使用硬膜外麻醉的比例较低(47.7% 对 56.7%),阴道分娩的比例较高(52.3% 对 42.2%),但两组之间的分娩结果没有统计学差异。参加干预的妇女对分娩的态度得分更高(59.1 vs 54.3 p00.001):讨论:较高的心理测量得分表明,干预组妇女的应对感和控制感都有所增强。包括辅助疗法在内的产前教育可以减少恐惧,改善对分娩的态度:重复研究方案可将研究结果推广到更多不同的妇女群体中,数据将有助于更大规模的荟萃分析设计,以检测手术分娩的较小治疗效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Antenatal education incorporating complementary medicine techniques for labour and birth to reduce the rates of epidural in primiparous women: A randomised control trial

Problem

Globally medical management of labour and birth has significantly increased, with epidurals attributed to the cascade of interventions.

Background

There are few randomised control trials that evaluate the effectiveness of antenatal education programs. A previous trial at two Australian hospitals found an antenatal program of integrative complementary therapies significantly reduced rates of interventions for low-risk primiparous women.

Aim

To reduce rates of intervention in labour and birth, with a primary outcome of decreased epidural use during labour.

Methods

Low to moderate risk primiparous women were randomised at 24–36 weeks’ gestation to the intervention group and standard care, or standard care alone. Clinical and psychological measures were analysed by intention-to-treat. Trial registration ACTRN12618001353280

Findings

In total, 178 women participated (n = 88 intervention, n = 90 Standard care), demographic characteristics were similar between groups, almost half (49 %) reported a pre-existing medical condition, and wellbeing scores fell within the average range. Epidural use was lower in the intervention group (47.7% vs 56.7 %) with higher rates of vaginal birth (52.3% vs 42.2 %), however, no statistical differences for birth outcomes were found between groups. Attitude to childbirth scores were statistically higher for women who attended the intervention (59.1 vs 54.3 p00.001).

Discussion

Higher psychometric scores demonstrated women in the intervention group felt an increased sense of coping and control. Antenatal education that includes complementary therapies can reduce fear and improve attitudes about childbirth.

Conclusions

Replicating study protocols enabled the generalisability of findings to a more diverse group of women, and data will contribute to a larger meta-analysis design to detect smaller treatment effects for operative birth.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Midwifery
Midwifery 医学-护理
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
7.40%
发文量
221
审稿时长
13.4 weeks
期刊介绍: Midwifery publishes the latest peer reviewed international research to inform the safety, quality, outcomes and experiences of pregnancy, birth and maternity care for childbearing women, their babies and families. The journal’s publications support midwives and maternity care providers to explore and develop their knowledge, skills and attitudes informed by best available evidence. Midwifery provides an international, interdisciplinary forum for the publication, dissemination and discussion of advances in evidence, controversies and current research, and promotes continuing education through publication of systematic and other scholarly reviews and updates. Midwifery articles cover the cultural, clinical, psycho-social, sociological, epidemiological, education, managerial, workforce, organizational and technological areas of practice in preconception, maternal and infant care. The journal welcomes the highest quality scholarly research that employs rigorous methodology. Midwifery is a leading international journal in midwifery and maternal health with a current impact factor of 1.861 (© Thomson Reuters Journal Citation Reports 2016) and employs a double-blind peer review process.
期刊最新文献
The work of midwives: The socio-institutional theory of the meaning of midwives’ work-life balance International News January 2025 “With an unwanted pregnancy, we are looking for midwives in the neighbourhood to show us what to do.” Stakeholder perceptions of midwife-led woman-centred comprehensive abortion care in the province of Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo: a qualitative descriptive study The future of midwifery care and education in Belgium: A discussion paper. Effectiveness of supporting lifestyle change in pregnant mothers with obesity through the wearable internet-of-things (SLIM) -intervention on self-efficacy in weight management in pregnant women: A quasi-experimental trial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1